DOT imposes 3-hour rule for tarmac delays

Remember the fight earlier this year over a passenger bill-of-rights? What Congress didn't do with legislation the Department of Transportation has done by regulation: Airlines can no longer strand passengers on planes on airport tarmacs for more than three hours without a good safety or security reason. Heavy fines could follow violations. DOT went further and said it would flag airlines that operate chronically late flights for deceptive trade practices.

The airlines think hard-and-fast rules on tarmac delays are a bad idea and will lead to more cancellations and other "unintended consequences." The rest of us "customers" think it's about time airlines were required to do the right thing for those it calls "passengers." Read more about what DOT did here. 

A change is coming to commenting on
Watch for our new commenting platform on April 25.
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Load comments