PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
comments
1
options
 
Sunday, October 4, 2009

Here is a really interesting case of what takes precdence: US Airways' right not to be regulated by state liquor laws on its airplanes, or state's right to deny an airline a liquor license because of public safety concerns. Last week, a U.S. District judge in Albuquerque said New Mexico has the right to deny a license to US Airways to protect its citizens. In particular, the state said the airline had served a man drinks after he was intoxicated, and he caused a highway accident that killed a family of five.

US Airways argued that the state did not have the power to regulate its practices in this case because the Airline Deregulation Act gave only the federal government that right. Airlines have successfully used that argument in the past to fend off efforts by states to regulate them, usually on consumer-rights issues. Read more about what happened in this case here.

Posted by Tom BELDEN @ 3:16 PM  Permalink | 1 comment
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:56 PM, 10/04/2009
    more drunks per capita than any other state, but they cant afford to fly so why punish everybody else?
    footlooseman


1 comments
About Tom Belden
Tom Belden has been reporting about Philadelphia International Airport and other air travel subjects for more than 20 years, writing columns for The Inquirer's Travel and Business sections. His reporting (with colleague Craig McCoy) on baggage handling problems in Philadelphia have been credited with helping to improve the system. His previous blog was called Road Warrior. He can reached at tbelden@phillynews.com.