Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Sandy warnings "not satisfactory"

National Hurricane Center official: Should have kept it simple.

Sandy warnings "not satisfactory"


Right after Sandy landed on New Jersey coast on the evening of Oct. 29, the matter of whether it was technically a hurricane appeared to be an esoteric question of some meteorological and historical interest.

But in the weeks since, it has mutated into a brouhaha that by any measure has been handled clumsily by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Overall, Sandy was a forecasting triumph for NOAA's National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service, with warnings well in advance, with attendant laundry lists of impacts.

However a decision was made to drop "tropical-storm" and "hurricane" warnings from the mid-Atlantic region on north as the storm tracked up the coast.

Why? Technically, the storm was forecast to interact with a strong system moving eastward across land and transform into a hybrid "post-tropical cyclone."

Some meteorological heavyweights, including private giants Joel Myers of Accu-Weather Inc. and Bryan Norcross of the Weather Channel strongly criticized the decision.

They argued that the distinction was unnecessary and confusing, and that in the court of common sense a storm with hurricane-force winds merited a "hurricane" warning.

This afternoon, Chris Landsea, Science and Operations Officer at the National Hurricane Center, and one of the nation's most-respected tropical storm specialists, essentially agreed.

He said in an interview posted on Accu-Weather's site that 

"Sandy was not ideal, and the way we handled it was not right. But we're fixing it," Landsea told

"We realize this was not satisfactory and we want to make it better for next year."

Inquirer Weather Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Everyone talks about the weather, and here we write about it.

When we’re around and conditions warrant, we’ll keep you updated about what’s coming, but we will do our best always to discuss weather and climate developments in context and remind you that nothing in the atmosphere happens in a vacuum.

Tony Wood has been writing about the atmosphere for The Inquirer for 26 years.

Reach Tony at

Tony Wood Inquirer Weather Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter