Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Friday, October 9, 2009

     The Norwegian Nobel committee has done President Obama no favor by awarding him the 2009 Peace Prize.


     The committee clearly bestowed the prize for Obama’s intentions, not his achievements - since nominations were closed on Feb. 1, 2009, 12 days after he took office. At bottom this was an effort to boost Obama’s efforts to promote “a new climate in international politics” and to abandon the unilateralism that characterized the presidency of George W. Bush. The award openly aims at encouraging Obama to live up to his campaign promises to pursue diplomacy and dialogue and a world without nuclear weapons.


      Yet nothing more clearly demonstrates the gap between Nobel committee hopes and on-the-ground reality than the fact that the prize was announced on a day when Obama was holding high level White House talks about future strategy in Afghanistan.


       Obama may seek dialogue, and may even encourage Afghan reconciliation talks with low and medium level Taliban. However, senior Taliban leaders and Al Qaeda aren’t interested in bargaining. They are interested in taking over Afghanistan, setting up an Islamic emirate, and using it to destabilize Pakistan and get their hands on nuclear weapons.


        The Peace Prize may enhance Obama’s appeal to rational actors in the international community who want to play by global rules. But those whose minds are focused solely on narrow national goals, like Russia’s Vladimir Putin, have little interest in behaving like good global citizens. Those gripped by ideology, such as al-Qaeda and the Iranian regime, have little interest in multilateral institutions. They want to create their own rules. 


         The Nobel Award won’t make the Israelis and Palestinians more willing to compromise, nor will it make Indians and Pakistanis more likely to settle differences over Kashmir. Nor will it overcome U.S. domestic political squabbles over the economic costs of combating global warming.


          It will symbolize global aspirations that President Obama can’t meet, for reasons that often lie beyond his control, and reflect the mess he inherited from his predecessor.


         At best the Nobel will burnish Obama’s aura abroad and may help him on the margins; at worst, it will serve as an awkward reminder that the world’s inherent violence and imperfections aren’t always susceptible to dialogue, even though it’s worth trying..  Despite admirable intentions, Obama has to operate in the real world.


                                   -------


        Read more of my comments on Obama's Nobel Peace Prize in my column on Sunday at go.philly.com/trudyrubin

Posted by Trudy Rubin @ 1:55 PM  Permalink | 20 comments
Comments   
Posted 02:49 PM, 10/09/2009
SteveMG
Trudy, what do you think Hillary has been screaming at Bill the last few hours?
Posted 02:58 PM, 10/09/2009
pj katauskas
Right on again, Ms. Rubin. Butit's a liberal exaggeration that Bush's diplomacy was unilateralism. He assembled a coalition to invade Iraq. That wasn't unilateralism. No, the coalition wasn't as broad as his father assembled, but Hussein at that time had actually invaded an Arab state, so it was easier to get participants. Bush rejected liberal calls for unilateralism in the North Korea talks; the liberals wanted one-on-one talks instead of the six party talks favored by Bush and other nations with interests there. Ironically, it was the liberals who wanted unilateralism in dealing with North Korea. Bush certainly didn't deal unilaterally with the Israeli/Palestine conflict.
Posted 03:05 PM, 10/09/2009
pj katauskas
Oh no, does this mean he'll have to give an acceptance speech? Not ANOTHER speech. And surely there will be "a major presidential address" when he (finally) makes a decision about Afghanistan. He's going to kill us with speechifying! He should just record all his speeches and pipe them into all the places al-Qaida and the Taliban are hiding. Talk about a quick victory!
Posted 03:13 PM, 10/09/2009
xi_lives
I dont' want a multilateral President...I want one that puts US interests first and foremost....Good piece Trudy.
Posted 03:15 PM, 10/09/2009
rgreen72
Moderates like me realize that OBAMA is the greatest man ever and this is a deserved award. He is incredible, OBAMA has done so much like..... Well he said HOPE AND CHANGE that deserves a Nobel Peace Prize. The man is incredible. He can do no wrong and ll you haters just realize that this will push more moderate worshipers like me toward him more. OBAMA loves you haters he will heal you he will save you. Bow down before his greatness just look at how the world loves him he is the leader of the world and will lead us all to nirvana. (or he is the anti christ I dont know but the way the world is going it is starting to get scary and I mean really hero worship scary from his followers who cant tell me one thing he has done but that doesnt stop them from telling me he deserves it)
Posted 03:16 PM, 10/09/2009
kelprod1
Clearly, Obama has not earned this award- he should do the right thing and simply not accept it until his actions (not endless speechwriter/ teleprompter words) can be judged. Awarding this to a completely undeserving and unaccomplished Obama, when nominations closed 12 days into his presidency, is an "historic" caliber insult to all who have truly "earned" this award previously. Obama's record as a US Senator is non existent (he authored zero pieces of legislation and only made 1 overseas trip- and that during his phony & staged campaign). he has accomplished absolutely nothing whatsoever except to continually alienate our allies while bolstering our enemies. Do not even get me started on his borderline criminal delay in setting strategy in Afghan- he has been in office 10 months and still has no strategy or response to his commanding generals call for help???? What a disgrace.
Posted 03:31 PM, 10/09/2009
pj katauskas
rgreen LOL!!!!!
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Posted 04:34 PM, 10/09/2009
MaggieL
Wow. "Nobel Prize Makes Obama Look Bad. Bush At Fault"
Posted 09:27 PM, 10/09/2009
SPENDSPEND
Rubin .... please quit your job and start emptying the trash. You are blindsided by your hatred of anything not democrap. Please when your paper folds forever .....get a job!
Posted 07:37 AM, 10/10/2009
CD75
Liberals are more concerned with grand and bald talk from a teleprompter than actual deeds forged with bravery and sweat. Every President since JFK has talked about nuclear reduction and world peace. Under the new Nobel Prize standard, they should get the prize too. What Obama is preaching is 1930's appeasement wrapped in new packaging. Europe is doing what Europe does best - nothing. Unfortunately, the only way we can have peace in this crazy world with nuts like Putin, Iran, and religious facism is through strength. For the historically challenged, look up the "Lesson of Munich". History is indeed repeating itself with Obama and Europe's love of him. God help us all in the long run.
Posted 12:58 PM, 10/10/2009
jimy_max
the typical "GOP partisan reaction of the past 250 days" to this proud American achievement is proof that Republicans hate Obama more than they love America. we are a sad and, for a small sliver of America, a very unpatriotic nation. case closed, - jimy_max
Posted 01:38 PM, 10/10/2009
Ariadne8
A man who will not meet with the Dalai Lama when he should because he is AFRAID of China does not deserve this prize.
Posted 01:43 PM, 10/10/2009
jimy_max
MaggieL: that's the way the cookie breaks sometimes. Baby Bush has gotten away with mere hand-slaps his whole life for his many personal and public transgressions. Georgie Boy needs to be held more accountable for his incompetence and malice against the U.S. and the world. George W. has had "luck" behind his sails for his complete, elite, priviledged worldly existance. we can hope that his final scorecard will be truly judged by a Higher Being. karma can be a beyotch, - jimy_max
About Trudy Rubin
Trudy Rubin’s Worldview column runs on Wednesdays and Sundays. In the past five years she has visited Iraq nine times and has also written from Iran, Pakistan, Israel, the West Bank, Gaza, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, China and South Korea . She is the author of Willful Blindness: the Bush Administration and Iraq, a book of her columns from 2002-2004. In 2001 she was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in commentary and in 2008 she was awarded the Edward Weintal prize for international reporting.