Monday, July 6, 2015

Hardline Salafis on rise in Egypt's political season

One of the most unsettling developments of Egypt's Arab Spring has been the surge of activity by ultraconservative Salafist Muslims, who used to denounce conventional politics.

Hardline Salafis on rise in Egypt's political season

Mohammed Nour, spokesman for the Salafi Nour party
Mohammed Nour, spokesman for the Salafi Nour party

One of the most unsettling developments of Egypt’s Arab Spring has been the surge of activity by ultraconservative Salafist Muslims, who used to denounce conventional politics.

Salafism is a puritanical form of Sunni Islam that aims to emulate the faith as it was practiced during the Prophet Muhammad's time.  Unlike the Muslim Brotherhood, which has long tried to engage in politics, when it was not being repressed by past Egyptian governments, the Salafis concentrated on preaching and social work.  Some veered into violence.

But today – in the midst of Egypt’s open political season – Salafis have formed two political parties, and a Salafi, Hazem Saleh Abu Ismail, is running for president.

Salafis are a wild card in the elections, with some predicting they could win ten per cent of the votes. They don’t speak with one voice: Some preach hatred of Christians on well-funded satellite channels,  some have attacked Christians and burned churches, while others denounce such actions.  Although they deny it, Salafi groups are rumored to receive substantial funds from Saudi Arabia.  

There is no question these fundamentalists want to push for an Islamic state and to change Egypt’s conservative but tolerant culture: Abu Ismail says if he were president all women would have to veil.  Recently, at a Salafi rally in Alexandria, a statue of Zeus surrounded by mermaids was covered up because it was considered indecent.

Yet some Salafis insist they are misunderstood.  I interviewed Mohammed Nour, the spokesman for the Nour (light)  Party, who runs a multi-media production company that makes films and apps for I-phones.  He wore a suit with a striped shirt, and his office sported orange couches with chrome armrests, and a office secretary with in a headscarf  and long skirt but face uncovered. “The image in the media of salafis with long robes is not necessarily true,” he told me in an obvious charm offensive.

 But when I asked why Salafis were entering politics, he responded, “We’re always going to believe the Islamic way of life is better than democracy.  But all Egyptians believe change can happen through these elections, so we should all present ourselves.”

So it is an open question whether - as some Egyptians hope - Salafis will be tamed by participation in poltics, or whether they see democracy as a means towards an undemocratic end.

 Salafi parties and groups originally allied with the Muslim Brotherhood, but – resentful of the Brotherhood’s superior organization – they later formed their own alliance of fundamentalist candidates. One big question in the upcoming elections is whether they will emerge from the election with a key bloc of seats that, if joined with the Brotherhood, would give Islamists a majority in parliament.  That would give them latitude to press the more cautious Brotherhood to adopt more hardline views.

Inquirer Opinion Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Trudy Rubin’s Worldview column runs on Thursdays and Sundays. Over the past decade she has made multiple trips to Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Turkey, Israel and the West Bank and also written from Syria, Tunisia, Lebanon, Iran, Russia, Ukraine, South Korea and China. She is the author of Willful Blindness: the Bush Administration and Iraq, a book of her columns from 2002-2004. In 2001 she was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in commentary and in 2008 she was awarded the Edward Weintal prize for international reporting. In 2010 she won the Arthur Ross award for international commentary from the Academy of American Diplomacy.

Reach Trudy at

Trudy Rubin Inquirer Opinion Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter