Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Tunisia: between hope and cynicism

Writing about Tunisia's spectacular elections involves a tussle between hope and the cynicism that comes from having long covered the Middle East.

Tunisia: between hope and cynicism

0 comments
Hemadi Jebali, secretary-general of Ennadha (al-Nahda) party. (Trudy Rubin / Staff)
Hemadi Jebali, secretary-general of Ennadha (al-Nahda) party. (Trudy Rubin / Staff)
Travel Deals

Writing about Tunisia’s spectacular elections involves a tussle between hope and the cynicism that comes from having long covered the Middle East.

The elections themselves were more impressive than I could have imagined, with enormous queues waiting for hours.  I had seen similar lines and inked thumbs in Iraq in 2005. But there many Shiites joined the line because they were instructed to do so by Shiite Grand Ayatollah Sistani, and came after much terrible violence and a top down imposition of democracy. 

In Tunisia, from what I could see, the urge to vote was an expression of joy at the peaceful, bottom-up revolt that toppled a dictator. But here’s where the hope vs. cynicism factor kicks in.

 The party with the most votes – a hefty plurality at this point – is an Islamist group called Ennadha, which as I wrote today in my column, is far more moderate than any other Islamist group in the region.  In my interviews with Ennadha’s two top leaders, Rashid Ghannouchi and Hemadi Jebali, it was hard not to be impressed by their claim that Islamic values and democratic politics could mesh, and their insistence that they respected a pluralist political system and women’s rights.

However, there is plenty of evidence that sections of Ennahda’s rank and file are more hardline that these two leaders, and conflicting evidence as to whether they’re ready to reject hardline salafi Islamists who use violence. (Both men told me they reject the use of violence by anyone, salafi or not, but they haven’t really made a strong public stand against recent salafi attacks on a TV station and its owner).

Moreover, it’s hard to check the claims by many secular Tunisians that Ghannouchi uses a double standard, saying one thing to a Western audience and another to Arab audiences.  I queried him on one such claim, that he had called for the restoration of the Arab caliphate in a speech in Cairo, even though he told me that he believes religious and political institutions must be separate in a modern state.  

He denied making any such statement, and told me he had spoke of modern forms of Muslim unity such as the Arab Mahgreb Union of North African countries.  And I’ve yet to pin down any verifiable report of this claim.  Yet the claims of doublespeak were repeatedly raised by worried secular Tunisians.

I have seen too many Islamist parties in the Mideast, not to worry that even good intentions can be waylaid by the primal urge by such parties to instill “Islamic values.”

Ghannuchi and Jebali are impressive, and if they mean what they say, they deserve strong support from the West.   But their spoken intentions have yet to be tested. And many of their youthful followers may have a far less sophisticated understanding of moderate Islam, believing that a resounding  victory means the winner can impose his views.        

 

Inquirer Opinion Columnist
0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Trudy Rubin’s Worldview column runs on Thursdays and Sundays. Over the past decade she has made multiple trips to Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Turkey, Israel and the West Bank and also written from Syria, Tunisia, Lebanon, Iran, Russia, Ukraine, South Korea and China. She is the author of Willful Blindness: the Bush Administration and Iraq, a book of her columns from 2002-2004. In 2001 she was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in commentary and in 2008 she was awarded the Edward Weintal prize for international reporting. In 2010 she won the Arthur Ross award for international commentary from the Academy of American Diplomacy.

Reach Trudy at trubin@phillynews.com.

Trudy Rubin Inquirer Opinion Columnist
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter