email
size
comments
4
options
 
Sunday, June 27, 2010

The Inquirer's Craig LaBan awards three bells to Garces Trading Company, the casual cafe/market/BYOB restaurant from Jose Garces, which has a State Store-operated wine boutique within.

LaBan writes that the partnership with the Liquor Control Board isn't even the most exciting part of Garces Trading Company. "What I'm most intrigued by is how the Garces Trading Co. is testing the boundaries of fine dining by pushing it toward an ever more casual setting," LaBan writes. "Just how far from old formalities can Garces go and still deliver high-end food, where the sublime fusilli carbonara with house-cured guanciale and plats du jour crocks of bouillabaisse aren't just camera-ready gorgeous but also available for takeout?"

Not everyone is enthralled with the wine boutique. As I reported Saturday, competitors, the Washington Square West Civic Association, and State Rep. Babette Josephs have sued the LCB, accusing the state of playing favorites. The complaint, filed by lawyer David Kwass, who also owns the wine-cheese-beer cafe Tria, wants Common Pleas Court to end the arrangement. Should Garces have to apply for a liquor license for Garces Trading Company, the Wash West Civic president Judith Applebaum told me last week, the group would not object.

It should be emphasized that Garces is neither the target of the suit or accused of any wrongdoing.

The rumored back story of the arrangement is that the LCB first approached Marc Vetri with the idea, but he turned it down. LCB officers did not return my call for comment last week, and an LCB rep told me there would be no comment about the lawsuit because LCB had not been served.

The LCB rep did say that other such wine boutiques are being considered for undisclosed locations but are not imminent.

Post edited: Brownstoner was first to report the lawsuit, two days before its actual filing.

Posted by Michael Klein @ 11:52 AM  Permalink | File Under: TableTalk | 4 comments
4
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:00 PM, 06/27/2010
    The restaurants crying foul have more than enough resources to maintain the suit (one of their owners is even the lawyer). Why are the other plaintiffs involved?
    NotADoneDeal
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:13 PM, 06/27/2010
    Leave it to the clueless Babbette Josephs to weigh in on the wrong side of the issue. Anything we can do to loosen the stranglehold of the LCB is a good thing. Let them experiment. How Josephs gets reelected each time, I have no idea. A complete waste of a seat in the legislature.
    Tatts
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:58 PM, 06/27/2010
    Tria owner David Kwass sues other restaurants and bars as a personal injury attorney and then takes that money to open Tria locations. That is pretty unfair. Garces better keep his floors dry, nudge nudge, hint hint, say no more, say no more... Although Tria is trying to say Garces is not the target that is not true IMHO. Garces spent millions to get this place ready based on the contract he had with the PA LCB. The plaintiffs will hurt their nearby competitor, Garces, if they win this case. Tria's owner should concentrate on serving his wines at a more reasonable price to the diners. Right now I enjoy a much fresher glass of wine, served at the proper temperature and at one fourth the cost, all notable differences and improvements at Garces instead of Tria. There is no need to mention the food is ten times better at Garces than Tria. Play Fair Kwass and Tria, I will boycott you until you do. "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers" We would be much better off without Tria or this TriaL. The wasted PA Taxpayer money defending this worthless case by competitors Tria is a disgrace
    hypocrite


4 comments
About Michael Klein
Michael Klein, the editor/producer of philly.com/Food, writes about the local restaurant scene in his Inquirer column "Table Talk." Have a question? Email it! See his Inquirer work here.
Follow on Twitter

The Insider Video Show