Monday, August 31, 2015

Smart PR from Comcast

It avoided the black eye McDonald's got

Smart PR from Comcast

Blog Image
Joe Clancy accepts petitions

 To give credit where it is due, Comcast was ready when it learned protesters planned to crash its Wednesday-morning shareholders meeting at the Kimmel.


It made a conscious decision to avoid controversy and to not give itself a public-relations black eye, as protesters might have liked.


McDonald’s wasn’t as wise:


Trespassing is against the law, and Occupy Philadelphia protesters did take over Comcast’s lobby when that protest was in town. Comcast was pretty patient about it.


That protest reminded me of sit-ins in the offices of college presidents that was all the rage for a while.


I am  OK with nonviolent protests like that, up to a point. The point is where you interfere with the lives of other people, the people you are supposedly trying to help. In a democracy there is no need for violent protest – and it is against the law.


 On Wednesday (the protesters never really planned to “crash” – and couldn’t under the watchful eyes of police civil affairs squad) a deal was cut: Protesters would be allowed into the lobby while the meeting continued and they would present anti-merger petitions to a Comcast exec. The chosen exec was security director Joe Clancy.


When the doors were opened – I had slipped inside earlier to watch from within in case there was a disturbance – the protesters filed in and Free Press’ Mary Alice Crim presented the petitions to Clancy. It was all very civil.


The few dozen protesters turned and headed to the door but stopped when the Media Mobilizing Project’s Jeff Rousett got on the bullhorn and started giving Comcast a mild form of hell.


This was right outside the walls of the Perelman Theater where the meeting was taking place and was a mild violation of decorum.


I waited to see whether Comcast, the cops or the protesters would blink first. I figured the cops wouldn’t let it go on endlessly and I think Rousett knew that, too. He went on for a few minutes, concluded his amplified remarks with, “We’ll be back,” and departed.


It was a “win” for everyone. Protesters  made their point, Comcast let them and avoided bad publicity and freedom of speech was honored.


Regardless of how you feel about Comcast’s proposed merger, its price structure, customer service or anything else, it handled this beautifully.


Daily News Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Stu Bykofsky has been a columnist with the Philadelphia Daily News since 1987. Prior to the column, his assignments included theater critic, TV critic, copy editor, general assignment features reporter. He supports civil-rights and animal causes, he opposes political correctness, bicycles on the sidewalk and most other forms of selfishness and stupidity.
 Follow Stu on Twitter

Reach Stu at

Stu Bykofsky Daily News Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter