Thursday, July 30, 2015

Knee replacement: Can the robot save you?

If you opted to read this article you likely have a painful knee, perhaps due to arthritis.

Knee replacement: Can the robot save you?


If you opted to read this article you likely have a painful knee, perhaps due to arthritis. You may have had limited success with cortisone or hyaluronic acid injections or perhaps platelet rich plasma. You tried glucosamine for a few months. It may have helped a bit. Being active is a great way to fight father time and control stress, but will your knee let you continue with the same activities you have enjoyed for years? Whether it is skiing or just walking without pain, you are seeking a solution.

Once you have exhausted non-operative measures you may be thinking about surgery. The least invasive of the procedures is arthroscopic surgery. The surgeon introduces a camera about the size of a pen into your knee. The surgeon can look into the knee to remove torn or loose tissue. As an arthritic treatment, the success is limited.

Osteotomies are procedures where the bone is cut and realigned in order to unload the arthritic portion of the knee. This procedure is technically challenging for the surgeon, but can yield very good results. Recovery can be several months.

Total knee arthroplasty TKA (replacement) is the most invasive knee surgery but yields predictably good results. Individuals with arthritis in more than one of the three compartments of the knee benefit from this procedure. Surgery is about an hour. Hospital stay could be 1-2 days and patients can be doing very well by 4-6 weeks.

Robotic Assisted Partial Knee Replacement

Partial knee replacement, also known as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is indicated for individuals with arthritis localized to one of the three compartments of the knee, typically the medial or inside of the knee. UKA has presented surgeons with technical challenges that may have been solved with recent advances in computer and robotic-assisted surgery.

The advantages over total knee replacement are that with UKA you are only resurfacing the arthritic portion of the knee while leaving the remaining articular surface and ligaments intact. TKA requires removal of all articular surfaces and at least partial ligament sacrificing. Recovery is faster than with TKA and patients are left with a more natural feeling knee.

Traditional knee replacement utilizes cutting blocks that are placed on the knee and the surgeon has to determine a “best fit” based on feel. Adding the robot to the procedure gives the surgeon data to determine the proper fit and balance of the knee. With the recent advent of robotic assistance, surgeons can have more predictable outcomes for this once technically demanding procedure. The alignment and movement of the knee can be restored to their pre-arthritic state. As with total knee replacement, the implants do not last forever and may need to be replaced in the future.

When using the robotic system, the knee anatomy is loaded into a computer either by using a preoperative CT scan or with intraoperative knee mapping technology. With mapping, the surgeon traces over the bones with a metal probe and an image is generated on the computer screen. This allows the surgeon to properly size the knee and determine where the bone cuts need to be made.

Next, the knee is put through range of motion and prepositioned markers on the leg allow us to determine the proper knee alignment. The computer then creates a virtual cutting template. With the surgeon holding a high speed burr in hand, the computer directs the surgeon on where to cut based on a color coded image on the computer screen. The computer can shut off the cutting instrument if outside of the template.

Once the implants are in place, the surgeon can recheck the knee’s alignment with the assistance of the computer. The knee anatomy should be restored to its pre-arthritic state. The procedure can be done as an outpatient and recovery is faster than for a total knee replacement. It is a more natural feeling knee and should lead to a higher level of function than for a total knee. With more precise alignment, it is believed that the implants will last longer; however long term data is not yet available.

Robotic-assisted knee resurfacing offers a viable alternative to total knee arthroplasty and conventional partial knee replacement.

Elliott Leitman, M.D. is an orthopaedic surgeon at First State Orthopaedics in Newark, DE, and serves as Team Physician for the Delaware 87ers and Lincoln University.

Read more Sports Doc for Sports Medicine and Fitness.
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Whether you are a weekend warrior, an aging baby boomer, a student athlete or just someone who wants to stay active, this blog is for you. Read about our growing list of expert contributors here.

J. Ryan Bair, PT, DPT, SCS Founder and Owner of FLASH Sports Physical Therapy, Board Certified in Sports Physical Therapy
Brian Cammarota, MEd, ATC, CSCS, CES Partner at Symetrix Sports Performance
Ellen Casey, MD Physician with Drexel University Sports Medicine
Desirea D. Caucci, PT, DPT, OCS Co-owner of Conshohocken Physical Therapy, Board Certified Orthopedic Clinical Specialist
Michael G. Ciccotti, M.D. Head Team Physician for Phillies & St. Joe's; Rothman Institute
Julie Coté, PT, MPT, OCS, COMT Magee Rehabilitation Hospital
Justin D'Ancona
Peter F. DeLuca, M.D. Head Team Physician for Eagles, Head Orthopedic Surgeon for Flyers; Rothman Institute
Joel H. Fish, Ph.D. Director of The Center For Sport Psychology; Sports Psychology Consultant for 76ers & Flyers
R. Robert Franks, D.O. Team Physician for USA Wrestling, Consultant for Phillies; Rothman Institute
Ashley B. Greenblatt, ACE-CPT Certified Personal Trainer, The Sporting Club at The Bellevue
Brian Maher, BS, CSCS Owner, Philly Personal Training
Julia Mayberry, M.D. Attending Hand & Upper Extremity Surgeon, Main Line Hand Surgery P.C.
Jim McCrossin, ATC Strength and Conditioning Coach, Flyers and Phantoms
Gavin McKay, NASM-CPT Founder/Franchisor, Unite Fitness
Heather Moore, PT, DPT, CKTP Owner of Total Performance Physical Therapy, North Wales and Hatfield, PA
Kelly O'Shea Senior Producer,
Tracey Romero Sports Medicine Editor,
David Rubenstein, M.D. Sports Medicine Surgeon, Rothman Institute
Robert Senior Event coverage, Sports Doc contributor
Justin Shaginaw, MPT, ATC Athletic Trainer for US Soccer Federation; Aria 3B Orthopaedic Institute
Thomas Trojian MD, CAQSM, FACSM Associate Chief of the Division of Sports Medicine at Drexel University
Latest Videos
Also on
letter icon Newsletter