What to think of all this Bynum stuff?
The Sixers announced in a release that Andrew Bynum probably won't be on the court for the team until around mid-December, perhaps later. What gives?
What to think of all this Bynum stuff?
Bob Cooney
I was at Sixers shootaround this morning when the release about Andrew Bynum was emailed to the media. I put the statement up on my blog but I was busy talking to players so I didn't have time to put my personal spin on this. So here it is.
I wrote for Saturday's Sportsweek that I thought it was crazy that we hadn't been able to get any updates on the health of Bynum. When it was asked twice last weekd if there was an update, we were told by the PR director (no doubt under someone's orders) that there was no update. I wrote on Saturday that ownership had dropped the ball in keeping fans in the dark concerning Bynum and the release today only cements that point more.
The third paragraph of the release reads: "Andrew received a fresh MRI and was seen again by Dr. (David W.) Altchek this past week on November 5."
Altchek is Bynum's personal doctor and the lead orthopedist caring for Bynum's knee. Didn't the Sixers know on Wednesday and Friday after the MRI what the results were? We asked for an update and told there wasn't any. Why? Why did it take a ton of emails from fans and being questioned in the paper before the truth came out? It's all just so silly. Are they not saying anything because Bynum's team (doctor, agent, etc.) doesn't want the truth coming out? Are they afraid of the fan's reaction to what the MRI revealed, that Bynum probably won't be on the court in uniform until somewhere around the holidays at the earliest?
In the grand scheme, which is having Bynum on the court, none of this really matters except it just seems so ridiculous that the media, and thus the fans, are being kept in the dark. If the guy's knee is so bad that he doesn't play at all this season, that's a shame for the team and the fans. But it's not like the team is invested in him for more than this year. And, yes, a huge part of the trade was parting with Andre Iguodala. His time had run its course here and his departure indeed was addition by subtraction.
But who is the Sixers ownership protecting with all the silence? Themselves? Again, I think they made a trade that was a no-brainer, even if Bynum doesn't pan out. They can then afford to look for another prime-time free agent during the offseason. Are they protecting Bynum, afraid that fans will start questioning his desire to play?
Their silence only fuels speculation and in this town that's never a good avenue to travel. Their statement this morning was a step in the right direction into letting us know what is expected. Bynum will also be available to talk to the media before tonight's game against Milwaukee. Perhaps this whole situation is finally going to start to become more clear.
One thing I want to make clear with the fans,who have understandably been comparing Bynum to Jeff Ruland. Bynum was given a physical before the trade and deemed healthy. His knees did allow him to play in 60 of 66 games for the Lakers last season and he missed four due to suspension, one to an ankle sprain and another for rest before the playoffs. The time he is missing is due to what his doctor calls a bone bruise, which was suffered on or around September 15.
Could he previous knee problems also be playing a part in his missing time? Perhaps, but I'm not doctor and haven't gotten word that this is the case. Could the injury he sustained be more than a bone bruise? Again, perhaps, but at the beginning of training camp the media was told there was no structural damage.
I sort of think that if Bynum hadn't suffered the mid-September injury he might be on the court right now. Or maybe not. Who knows? Getting answers on this subject hasn't been the easiest quest.
Now, about tonight's game. The Sixers will again have the services of Jason Richardson, who will return to the starting lineup after missing most of five games after spraining his left ankle in the first minute of the second game of the season. Richardson deemed himself 100 percent at shootaround this morning.
The team will again be without Kwame Brown, still sidelined with a calf strain.
A big matchup to watch tonight will be Sixers point guard Jrue Holiday against Milwaukee's Brandon Jennings. Holiday has had a lot of success against Jennings in the past and Jennings is coming off a horrendous 1-for-11 shooting performance against the Celtics on Saturday.
Trading away 4 first round draft picks (including AI) for two players with well-known, long-term, and chronic lower extremity problems is only a net positive if somehow the result is next summer we have an every day starting center with all-star potential. That player does not have to be Bynum - but we better get somebody or else the trade is a disaster. One thing management has clearly been signalling with how all the moves over the last few months were structured is that next summer is the key to the long-term future. I am patient enough to wait and see how it all plays out, but in no way do you dump a player of AI's consistently good overall production and say it is a net positive without getting some pretty good value in return. Time will tell.— barrywil- Is it for ticket sales for future games? I guess saying Bynum is out for X number of games for the future would hurt sales for those games?— Fascism Rules
- If he looks like a dog, acts like a dog, plays like a dog, then he's a dog.— alak0926
- Barrywil, we have to respectfully disagree because AI's consistently good overall production wasn't worth anywhere near the assets we tied up in him. Bob said it best in the article - anyway you slice it, AI leaving was addition by subtraction.— evolutionary
- I should have cleaned up the last sentence in my post. They did not JUST dump AI. They dumped FOUR present and future first rounders and in no way can anyone construe dumping AI PLUS 3 first rounders to be addition by subtraction. If we do not have a bonda-fide all star center next summer then the trade is a bust. Its is a calculated gamble I would have taken, but still a bust if it does not turn out well. Dumping AI ALONE for salary cap space would have been a net positive, but that is not what we are in the midst of here. The jury is still out. Even if Bynum were perfectly healthy and contributing monster numbers today the jury would still be out until a center is signed to a long-term deal by next summer. For now we have sent away a lot of talent for a promissory note we have yet to cash in. — barrywil
- Like the fact that both Cooney and Mitchell are starting to vent from the fact that "being left in the dark" has been the practice by this brass...This IS NOT just a bone bruise, it's got to be something closer to the patella tendonitis that has shelved Danny Granger for 3 months...something that was immediately communicated to media,Indiana fanbase, and the league...Question: what was the doctor on when Bynum passed his physical?— bearsfriend
- I wish it would happen more often. If the team doesn't want to cooperate with the media, well then you leave the writers no choice but to speculate for you. I think this Sixers regime will learn here that it's best to nip these things in the bud than to treat your fan base like lemmings
- Bear if you did not see this------ust Announced: @KingJames (21ppg, 11rpg) of @MiamiHEAT & @KennethFaried35 (16.8ppg, 12.8rpg) of @DenverNuggets named Players of the Week.--------
As far as AB-they dont seem to need him yet--so best to wait and this team has some nice chemistry going for it as constructed.
Mike D and NASH reunited in LA-that can only help the Lakers.They have the best starting 5 in the NBA.— HO HUM - agree w/evolutionary. finally getting the full picture of what guys like jrue, turner and young can be with iggy out of the picture alone is worth the trade. plus how would dorel wright be playing if he was sharing time w/iggy and turner for that matter? this team is still better now than it was last year w/o bynum and it couldn't have happened w/o the trade.— 76ers in 2076
- No - it is not addition by subtraction any way you slice it ... If they traded away three 1st round picks just to "dump" Iggy's contract, then they made a horrible trade. There were healthy players they could have gotten for Iggy (without adding three 1st rounders in the deal). And - they could have traded Iggy for a 1st round pick (or two). Then, the Sixers would still have their three, plus one or two more ...— Copper34
- The secrecy around keeping this news quiet is because they don't want to hurt ticket sales. Less tickets will be sold if they announce today that Bynum is out for the year. The ownership group is trying to play the fanbase here. It's somewhat understandable from a business point of view... but it's also very disrespectful to the die hard fans who support this team unconditionally.— bdd5014
- We`ll know more after Bynum takes qustions. It does seem that he gets to a certain rehab stage,has a setback and then has to start from the begining. This leads to questions about the diagnosis and rebab sched.— boogsbell
- Can someone please explain, how did he pass a physical with an injury that has kept him sidelined all of September and October??
- Starting at Center for your 2013-14 76ers...Mr. Al Jefferson!
Undersized for a 5, sure, but he's only missed a handful of games in the last three years. I'll take consistency over promise any day.— jklinger - We will see Phil E. Moose before we see Bynum.— AreaMan
Bob Cooney has been at the Daily News for more than 20 years, working in the sports department for the past 15. This is his third season on the Sixers beat. He has covered just about everything, but mostly college basketball, where he was the La Salle beat writer for six seasons. E-mail Bob at cooneyb@phillynews.com and follow him on Twitter.
