Effort to raise funds for Ackerman buyout falls short
Complete coverage of the Philadelphia School District by the Philadelphia Inquirer's Kristen Graham.
Effort to raise funds for Ackerman buyout falls short
Susan Snyder and Kristen Graham
The effort to raise $405,000 in private funds to help buy out former Superintendent Arlene C. Ackerman’s contract has fallen short and as a result, the Philadelphia School District must pay the entire $905,000, officials said this afternoon.
District lawyers had been weighing whether to withhold the payout because Ackerman had publicly criticized a top district finance official despite the fact that her separation agreement prohibits her from making disparaging remarks.
But the school district decided to make the payment and keep the agreement intact, they announced in a six-paragraph statement. Today was the deadline for the district to pay Ackerman under the agreement.
Officials acknowledged that they were unable to raise all of the $405,000 in private donations that they initially said they had pledges for. They declined to be specific on how much was raised or who exactly had contributed.
They blamed the failure on public pressure against keeping the donors anonymous. State Auditor General Jack Wagner notified the district by letter last week that his office was auditing the buyout agreement. Among the objectives was to uncover the identities of the donors.
There was widespread speculation last week that one or more of the donors had backed out due to public scrutiny.
The district has asked Philadelphia’s Children First Fund, a non-profit that was collecting the donations, to return the money.
The payout brings to an end the just over three-year controversial tenure of Ackerman, who came to the district from an education post at Columbia University.
Ackerman’s attorney confirmed the buyout.
“The settlement has occurred. The checks have been deposited," said Dean Weitzman, the attorney.
After her resignation, Ackerman went on a media blitz, offering interviews to a radio station, television station and a national education publication. She ripped chief financial officer Michael Masch on WURD-AM (900) in talking about the district's $600-million-plus budget hole. She said she asked him to resign.
Ackerman’s separation agreement says she may not make public comments "or disseminate any private or confidential information" about the School Reform Commission or senior members of the district's administration that are "malicious, wanton, or reckless," or that are "reasonably foreseeable to injure their reputations."
District officials announced last week that they would review Ackerman’s comments to determine if they violate the agreement.
In a statement sent this evening, the School Reform Commission said:
"The SRC is aware that questions have been raised about recent statements made by Dr. Ackerman. As stated last week, the SRC disagrees with these assertions. We also believe that it is a better use of the School District’s resources to focus our time and energy on ensuring that this school year is as successful as possible.
Since the terms of the settlement agreement became public two weeks ago, there has been considerable discussion of the plan to supplant some public monies with contributions from private donors who requested anonymity as a precondition of donation.
From the start, the School Reform Commission sought to keep the public cost of this agreement to a minimum. But the public concerns about the use of anonymous private donations led almost all donors to withdraw their pledges to contribute to the Philadelphia’s Children First Fund. The SRC accordingly, asked the Philadelphia Children’s First Fund to return any donations it has received in connection with our request of it to accept funds on behalf of the District for this purpose.
As a result, the payment to Dr. Ackerman does not include payments from anonymous private donors. Instead, all funds to Dr. Ackerman are public dollars from the Philadelphia School District.
Yesterday, the District had a tremendously successful opening of schools and a great first day. We intend to move forward and return our focus to the important work before us of building a system of great schools for all of our children."
This whole affair continues to Stink !! Now, when they hear there's going to be auditing of the buy-out money, it disappears!! So now, the total $ 905,000 comes directly out of School District Funds-while all along, they entreat their employees for give-backs so they can throw more tax dollars at someone who should have been fired for cause!!— cgraham- Yep..The SRC sees that Arlene has to be rewarded (despite her failures) for her generous donations of our tax dollars to law firms, contractors, etc. Teachers and other staff are asked to suffer reduced salaries, etc. so they can flip some of that money to Arlene and her enablers..Hopefully, the AG will insist on getting the donors names...It'll be fun to watch the squirming when they're exposed... — oblekr
- oblekr, you have it wrong--the SRC and the crony system at the District funnels the money to their chosen law firms, contractors, etc. Superintendents come and superintendents go (they especially go when they get too close to dismantling the crony system) but the cronyism remains. — tholonet
- Does my greediness offend you? Still my bank account rises.— brinsley
- Any other teachers and district employees notice the deafening silence from Nunery? We all received "welcome back" letters in an email and it was from Penny Nixon.— legend1
- That was really odd. Nunnery was on vacation. People are talking about Nixon for superintendent, which makes the whole thing a bit more interesting.
Kristen, if you have a shred of journalism blood in your body - and I'm pretty sure you don't - would you please look into whether Mr. Nunnery has his superintendent's certificate?
How about also seeing how the "threatening letter to Ackerman" incident was resolved?— Devoted Teacher - Devoted Teacher - At the August SRC meeting the SRC suspended eligibility requirements for acting District Superintendents "pursuant to Section 10-1003 of Public School Code." SRC Resolution 54, approved unanimously by SRC states: "the SRC...approves the qualifications of Dr. Nunery, who does not have a Superintendent's Letter of Eligibility." — tholonet
- Apparently the exact date for starting the school year was only determined at the last minute, otherwise a diligent superintendent would have scheduled a vacation at a different time. Or maybe not. — phillyguy36
- When will this circus end??— cgraham
Comment removed.- Set up a payment plan. Send her $20/month until paid off.— Nutball
- I wish the people who wrote Ackerman's contract, write mine too. I will get a Bonus for all the things I don't do, as what I do is a secret ????????????.— gigimanatt
- This is a mind-blowing disgrace!!!! Shame on All involved!— ucansoar
- That evil cow doesn't deserve a dime!— Timmmmy
- We definitely must know what went on behind the scenes here. Backing out, must mean deceitful reason not "scrutiny". C'mpn Wagner here is your rung to the big house in Harrisburg.— Francis J Graff
During the school year, you’ll frequently find her hosting live chats about the district on Philly.com. Please do pass along the scoop about what’s going on at your Philadelphia public school; Kristen welcomes tips, story ideas and witty banter at kgraham@phillynews.com or 215-854-5146.
You can also follow Kristen on Twitter here.
