Posted: Thursday, September 1, 2011, 10:43 PM | 16 comments |
 
options
 

EAST RUTHERFORD -- I knew a kid who was a backup quarterback. The problem was that when he went in, so did all the other second-string guys. Once, he took a snap on his own one-yard line and disappeared instantly for what seemed like a good hour.

At the least, it seemed long enough that suffocation could be an issue.

Eventually enough bodies were peeled off the top to reveal portions of his still intact and moving body. The point is that it was hard to figure if he could play the position given the circumstances, which is another way of saying that last night’s final exhibition game between the Jets backups and the Eagles backups did little to move the speculative to the informative.

Except, maybe, in the case of Vince Young.

Vince looked good in last night’s 24-14 Eagles victory. Again. Before he left late in the second quarter of the with what was described as a strained right hamstring, he completed 15 of 23 passes for 193 yards, adding to a solid and promising preseason that should quell some of the what-if jitters fans and media expressed after Michael Vick signed his six-year, $100 million deal this week.

He led the Eagles into scoring position during their first two possessions, including a 91-yard touchdown drive. He feathered passes, showed nice touch, ran the offense. He did this against the likes of Jamaal Westerman and Martin Tevaseu, with players such as Julian Vandervelde and Fenuki Tupou blocking for him.

Which is to say he performed with and against rookies and backups.

Still, he took a few big hits, used his 6-5, 230-pound frame to fend off one blitzer and complete a pass, threaded a 16-yard touchdown pass to Chad Hall in the middle of the end zone, might have even accumulated bigger numbers had Riley Cooper or Clay Harbor held onto tough catches.

Vince Young. Mike Kafka. Both have done well with and against the scrubs this season. One gives you athletic plays and a better-than-average arm. The other has a better grasp of the voluminous Eagles playbook, a little more accuracy perhaps, less mobility, a little less zip for sure.

The way both men were almost injured last night is a clear indication of why it will be Young, not Kafka, who goes on the field should the $100 million man pull his own muscles on a rollout, or be victimized by a few missed assignments by his still under-construction offensive line.

There’s even an uncanny déjà vu to it all, especially when Kafka was slammed to the ground last night and got up slowly. And while Young’s past in no way resembles Vick’s, he came to the Eagles a discarded and somewhat disgraced superstar, injuries and ineffectiveness costing him confidence and his starting job in Tennessee, his petulance and pouting costing him respect among some teammates and peers.

That perception is changing. Rather fast.

``I just want to make sure I’m taking care of my responsibilities as a quarterback with preparation and transferring everything from the practice field and the film room to the game,’’ Young said this week. ``I just want to go out there, manage the game, put points on the scoreboard, and show the coaches that I’m a good backup quarterback.’’

He did more than that last night. He showed them they might just be able to survive $100 million in lost assets if they have to.

Posted by Sam Donnellon @ 10:43 PM  Permalink | 16 comments
16
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:22 PM, 09/01/2011
    Given Vick's style of play they're going to need that from him at least a couple of times this year.
    hillbillybirdsfan
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:24 PM, 09/01/2011
    young made some nice plays...against backups. too bad you cant play backups in the regular season. oh yea and he pulled his hamstring AGAINST BACKUPS. the challeneg of playing against another teams weakest players was just too much for him. mostly andys fault there for another brilliantly deceptive pass play call. young is not and probably never will be a good starter in the NFL. I wouldnt even call him a good back up as he is literally the dumbest QB in the entire league according to his league-low wonderlic score. and forcing him to throw over and over is just stupidity. get ready.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:35 PM, 09/01/2011
    Anyone who things the Wonderlich score is a measure of intelligence isn't the sharpest tool in the box themself
    sbdons1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:40 PM, 09/01/2011
    Amen. brother. While not completely satiated, at least not until I see Young perform in "real time," I'm now a bit more confident that he could be more than a "place holder" for Vick.
    essell
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:43 PM, 09/01/2011
    CG25, I understand some of your skepticism, given the Eagles past plaoff disappointments. But did you even read the article? It says backups at least 5 times without you having to put it in CAPS, like you're actually making a point or something. And enough with the Wonderlic theory. I will bet my entire estate that I can post a much higher grade on the Wonderlic than you or any single one of the players and coaches in the NFL. SO WHAT? I don't expect NFL players to be that intelligent, and there have been some pretty stupid champions in the past. If they have amazing athletic ability and just enough brain to remember the playbook, history has shown that sometimes its enough to win the Lombardi.
    goeagles87
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:52 PM, 09/01/2011
    well, if you do some research as I have, you will see that SB winning quarterbacks have a higher wonderlic then all other players. meaning guys with lower wonderics often DO NOT win superbowls, or get anywhere near the superbowl. The average wonderlic score in the league is 24. average for starting QB's is 28. and average for SB winning QB's is 30.1, Vince young had a 15, Mcnabb a 15. brady, manning, brees, manning all had 33-38. those are not coincidences no matter how you want to slice it. it matters.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:51 PM, 09/01/2011
    Like Young for the back-up, defenses have to similarly account for him as they do Vick. If Vick suffers a season ending injury, no chance we win it all but I like him as a filler.
    jrob80
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:02 AM, 09/02/2011
    CG25 went through an entire discussion without saying NEVER. NEVER EVER...EVER. It's like Howard in an 0 for 16 skid...You just know he'll be back on top. EVER.
    Grazman
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:31 AM, 09/02/2011
    lol, not bad.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:06 AM, 09/02/2011
    Young won the majority of games he started in the NFL. He is a quality backup. The team showed it has some good depth by whipping the Jets backups, another team with championship aspirations. The Eagles will score in bunches, then terrorize opposing QB's with a great rush and a very talented secondary will make it tough to come back. It's a recipe for a very good season. I estimate about 12 wins, more if they gel faster than expected. They could go all the way, and why not? The eventual champions last season were lucky to beat the Eagles, and only did so because Akers missed a lot of kicks.
    Paul SoTX
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:11 AM, 09/02/2011
    who was the backup qb on the 1 yard line?
    juggadore
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:18 AM, 09/02/2011
    Enough with the silly poetry. Just report the game you twit
    blueye7
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:17 AM, 09/02/2011
    CG25, I won't pretend to have researched the wonderlic of winning QBs so extensively, and I do see your law of averages must not be coincidence. I also googled a bit and found it interesting that Marino and Jim Kelly also had low scores. What I wanted to say was that although the AVERAGE of winning QBs must be high, there always are anomalies, and always will be. It seems Terry Bradshaw scored a 16. Although I grant you that more intelligent QBs seem to have a better chance of winning the Super Bowl, it's far from guaranteed. Vick might not have as big of a chance to win as Brady or Manning, but we sort of knew that anyway. But to say he does not have any chance at all is nonsense. It's a team sport. Defense wins games as much as offense does. One other thing. I don't think everyone would be so offended by your posts if it didn't have the NEVER, EVER stuff. Just curious, if Reid were to finally change his philosophy and run the ball more and bring in better LBs, would you still be saying NEVER?
    goeagles87
  • Comment removed.


View comments: 1  |  2
About Sam Donnellon
Donnellon's career began in Biddeford, Me., in 1981, and has included stops in Wilkes-Barre, Norfolk, and New York, where he worked as a national writer for the short-lived but highly acclaimed National Sports Daily. He has received state and national awards at each stop and since joining the Daily News in 1992 has been honored by the Associated Press Sports Editors, the National Sportswriters and Sportscasters Association, the National Association of Black Journalists, the Associated Press Managing Editors of Pennsylvania and the Keystone Awards. He and his wife of 26 years have raised three fine children, none of whom are even the least bit impressed with the above. E-mail Sam at donnels@phillynews.com
Follow on Twitter