Sunday, August 30, 2015

Spicing up your spices with rodent hairs and Salmonella

And filth: "The most common types of filth adulterants" - found in up to 12% of imported spices over three years, the FDA reported - "were insect fragments, whole/equivalent insects, and animal hair," usually indicative of "rodent feces."

Spicing up your spices with rodent hairs and Salmonella

0 comments
Maybe it was TOO spicy for this guy. (AP/PETA)
Maybe it was TOO spicy for this guy. (AP/PETA)

Just when you thought our food supply was safe again.

In the wake of the government shutdown that suspended many of the essential protective services of the Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (we wrote about this a few weeks back), an  FDA report – released, appropriately, on Mischief Night – finds that the spices we season our foods with can be tainted with pathogens and filth.

A spicy meal, anyone?

Spices like black pepper, paprika, turmeric, oregano, and onion powder are almost ubiquitous in our foodstuffs, giving flavor to what we eat, even for the awful chefs among us.

Among the report’s findings: during three years of testing, 6.6% of imported spices (most spices consumed in the U.S. are imports) were contaminated with Salmonella – more than twice the rate of all other FDA-regulated foods – and 12% of imported spices contained filth. According to the report, “the most common types of filth adulterants were insect fragments, whole/equivalent insects, and animal hair,” and noted that “the presence of rodent hair (without a root) in spices is generally indicative of contamination by rodent feces.”

Hungry yet?

The report, evocatively titled “Draft Risk Profile: Pathogens and Filth in Spices,” calls attention to 14 significant outbreaks around the world between 1973 and 2010 that could be traced back to tainted spices, resulting in nearly 2,000 illnesses, 128 hospitalizations, and 2 deaths. Only 3 of the 14 known outbreaks were in the United States.

So why is the FDA dedicating precious resources to studying a problem that over the past 40 years has had seemingly little public health impact here? Well, besides the gross factor, the agency is concerned that, given the quantities of Salmonella turned up by tests of imported spices, the public may in fact be at risk. Furthermore, people may be underreporting spice-related Salmonella illnesses.  So many spices are in so many foods that identifying them as the source of an outbreak could be difficult; victims may not remember or even know the spices that they consumed 12 to 72 hours before getting sick.

To help reduce the risks of contamination and illness, FDA recommendations include increased and improved surveillance, working with international regulatory partners, and the improvement of storage practices by spice producers and distributors.

In the meantime, bon appetit!


Read more about The Public's Health.

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

What is public health — and why does it matter?

Through prevention, education, and intervention, public health practitioners - epidemiologists, health policy experts, municipal workers, environmental health scientists - work to keep us healthy.

It’s not always easy. Michael Yudell, Jonathan Purtle, and other contributors tell you why.

Michael Yudell, PhD, MPH Associate Professor, Drexel University School of Public Health
Jonathan Purtle, DrPH, MSc Assistant Professor, Drexel University School of Public Health
Janet Golden, PhD Professor of history, Rutgers University-Camden
Latest Health Videos
Also on Philly.com:
letter icon Newsletter