Innovation and positive change — these were reoccurring themes of Mayor Nutter’s keynote address at the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce’s Annual Mayoral Luncheon on Monday. With talk of green technology, pop-up gardens, the Reading Viaduct, and redevelopment initiatives targeting Market East and North Broad, Nutter depicted a city on the rise filled with citizens and government leaders who aren’t afraid to think outside the box.
When it came to the topic of doing something about endemic violence that plagues our city’s streets, however, the mayor’s speech took an unexpected turn toward stagnation and the status quo. In discussing the importance of public safety to business development, the mayor announced violence-prevention strategies—more cops, harsher punishments, and bounties on people's heads—that sounded better suited for a Wild West frontier town than the forward-thinking metropolis he otherwise portrayed the city to be.
I suggest that hospital-based violence intervention programs—an innovative, evidence-based, cost-effective strategy for violence prevention—are better aligned with the city’s progressive endeavors; and something that the mayor should consider.
Healing Hurt People (HHP) is a hospital-based violence intervention program in Philadelphia designed to break cycles of violence by reaching victims (and potential perpetrators) of violence at a critical moment in their lives: right after someone has tried to kill them.
Typically, when people are violently injured, they go the hospital, get stitched up, and get sent back to the street—often on the same day. HHP is founded on the notion that this process misses a major opportunity for violence prevention by failing to recognize three factors:
- Someone on the street probably still wants to do the injured person harm.
- The injured person might be planning to retaliate against the assailant.
- The psychological trauma of being the target of attempted murder might contribute to behaviors which increase risk of re-injury and retaliation.
If violence begets violence, it makes sense to intervene right after violence occurs.
Since 2008, HHP—a program of Drexel’s Center for Nonviolence & Social Justice—has acknowledged this reality and engaged clients in a trauma-informed process to prevent re-injury and retaliation. With support from the Scattergood Foundation and Philadelphia’s Department of Behavioral Health, HHP operates out of the emergency departments of Hahnemann Hospital and St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children.
At each hospital, HHP employs a social worker and community intervention specialist to provide a range of services—such as psychoeducation, case management, and mentorship—to positively change the life course trajectory of victims of violence
As Theodore Corbin, MD, HHP’s director, often says: “Our young people are dying and we can stop it.”
At present, there are at least 19 hospital-based violence intervention programs operating across the U.S. Recently, Philadelphia became the headquarters of the National Network of Hospital-based Violence Intervention Programs. A program similar to HHP was also launched at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia last month.
Why do such programs keep popping up across the country? Because they work.
Studies have shown that individuals who participate in emergency department-based violence intervention programs end up with lower rates of re-injury (8 percent vs. 20 percent) and arrest (18 percent vs. 57 percent) and higher rates of employment (20 percent vs. 82 percent) than those who do not.
Corbin, who is a Stoneleigh Foundation fellow and received support from the foundation, HHP is currently undertaking a comprehensive evaluation of the program’s impacts.
Hospital-based violence intervention programs are unique as they recognize that a violent injury is often the beginning of a cycle of violence—not the end. Research shows that 44 percent of victims of violence are re-injured within five years, while 20 percent die.
In 2010, 1,615 people were shot in Philadelphia, 244 fatally. In the absence of emergency department-based violence intervention programs, that’s 1,371 opportunities for violence prevention missed. HHP, and similar programs, should be replicated in emergency departments across the city. Such programs have enormous potential to stop violence in our city and are in keeping with the positive trends toward innovation and change that the mayor accurately articulated.
Read more about The Public's Health.
If the perps of violence were kept incarcerated, the victims would not be "re-injured" withing 5 years. Promoting programs that would have victims and perps sitting around singing kumbaya are not realistic. The fact that 1,615 people were shot is because the court system and DA let these punks run the streets when they should be kept out of the public realm. Unfortunately, rehabilitation is not in their vocabulary, only preying on the weak. dogman5- Careful statistical analysis over the longterm shows that you are right -- incarceration is a strong factor in the reduction of crime.
Some of this work was done by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, who wrote "Freakonomics." In it they attempt to debunk the conventional wisdom applied to social phenomena and human behavior.
The writer says Nutter calls for "harsher punishment" but I don't remember that as part of Nutter's crime response plan. Increased incarceration is the opposite of the directive of the DA and judges currently in Philly. Philly is doing the opposite of what is proven to work. CleanupPhilly
Rufus, that's my dogs name. Anyway, "get the SPCA involved"...what? So they won't reproduce. Wow of all things, Rufus. Hate because your population is not producing enough...that the most intelligent thing you can come up with...YOU don't need to reproduce. Showtime226
Rufus and dogman5, your short sighted perspectives are part of the problem. My advice: get out of Philly--things are getting more progressive (i.e., intelligent) around here. Move to Jersey or someplace where you'll feel more at home with others who also can't handle a complex thought. whatafricanguy?
By the way: Rufus, the fact that you didn't EVEN READ the article and are making judgments says a whole lot about where you're coming from--what a clown. I can't even imagine the other stupid conclusions you jump to throughout the day. whatafricanguy?
Claims that hospital based violence reduction programs are "effective" are based on an extremely small sample size. Plus, what did the researchers do to eliminate bias from the program participants self-selecting participation in the program because they are already better equipped, with more social support, and stronger families?
We have to look at a small study fully. The article doesn't go into those questions. Was this study fully randomized, and if so how? How long was the followup of the study participants? It's not accurate to claim a result if the next year, after the study ends, participants then are victimized or become victimizers.
Prospective studies that find true results are long term, fully randomized, multi-state affairs. It's not uncommon to see these studies conducted for 20 years. To make conclusions before the study is done is premature.
We don't have the money to spend on nice ideas that get some results that we can't verify might have happened anyway. Narcissists and sociopaths are not going to participate in the altruism of a research study. They will self-select out because it has no direct benefit to them.
The press has a duty to go deep, know what makes for good research, and don't just thump the drum for what sounds good and should work but we simply don't know for sure. CleanupPhilly
I remember back in my college days, a professor saying that every newborn was born with a "tabula rasa" brain. In other words..... A blank slate.
Most often, we humans learn by imitation. Each experience in life etches a mark on our brain which in turn makes us who we are.
Until parents become good and nurturing parents, we will continue to see young thugs with NO positive etchings on their brains. If we can't depend on parents, then what?? Whatever the what is, it has to happen early (birth to 3yrs. Old) or the need to remove these violent youngsters is a given. Perhaps in prison they will find a higher being who will provide the needed love and assurance that will turn them around. LRP/HHI
Cleanup, the fact that incarceration fails has a large sample size, but your spouting that nonsense. You want to stop violence? Raise taxes on the wealthy and corporations, and guarantee full employment, and put the leftover money into maintaining environments where people have things to do. HandNik
- Health data Statistics - local, national, global - on everything from injuries to risky behavior, spending, and insurance coverage
- Social determinants data Statistical resources on some of the underlying factors - social, economic, political - that shape population health
- Local health departments County and state agencies throughout the region
- Personal health resources Locate health centers, find emergency contacts, compare hospitals
- Check Up Experts on health policy, medication safety and Big Pharma, plus breaking news
- PhillyPharma Goings-on in the pharmaceutical industry
- Onco Girl 11-year-old Rachel Kovach on her battle with cancer
- GreenSpace On living the sustainable life
- Planet of the Apes How we evolve. Or not.
- Weather or Not Atmospherics, aka why did it pour here but not across the street?
- Live Science Philadelphia researchers' occasional dispatches from the field







