Grandparents and guns: A novel public health concern
Most discussion about the public health implications of the aging of America has focused on issues related to long-term care, chronic medical conditions, and rising health care costs. Now researchers at the University of Pennsylvania are raising another: gun safety.
Grandparents and guns: A novel public health concern
Jonathan Purtle, Doctoral candidate in public health. Works at Drexel's Center for Nonviolence and Social Justice
Most discussion about the public health implications of the aging of America has focused on issues related to long-term care, chronic medical conditions, and rising health care costs. Now researchers at the University of Pennsylvania are raising another: gun safety.
In their commentary this month in the American Journal of Public Health, Brian Mertens and Susan Sorenson point out that many of the questions that have come up about senior citizens and driving — such as those relating to memory, cognitive impairment, and judgment — apply to firearms, as well.
A mound of evidence tells us that risk of violent death increases immediately after the purchase of a handgun — mostly due to suicides and accidents — and remains high for at least five years. This risk, however, is particularly high among those age 65 and older.
That demographic currently accounts for 13 percent of the population, the largest in U.S. history, and is projected to grow to 20 percent by 2050. Gun ownership is also disproportionately high among older adults.
Survey research indicates that 37 percent of people 65 and older live in a home with a firearm, compared with 26 percent of those younger than 30. The authors of the commentary article note that many people cite protection as a key reason to buy firearms.
While one might think it makes sense for senior citizens, in particular, to arm themselves against criminals, the evidence suggests otherwise. According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, the risk of being a victim of robbery, rape, or violent assault is substantially lower among the elderly than any other age group (2.4 of every 1,000 people age 65 and over experience such a crime annually, compared with rates of 10.9 per 1,000 for people ages 50-64 and 26.9 per 1,000 for ages 21-24).
Nevertheless, the firearm industry has tried to take advantage of seniors’ fears and developed guns specifically for people with arthritis and mobility limitations. The maker of one such weapon tried to register it as a medical device in hopes that Medicare would pay for it — a proposal that the Food and Drug Administration rejected.
There is no easy solution to the issue of firearm safety among older adults. According to Penn’s Sorenson, “We need to consider multiple options that address multiple aspects. Possibilities include reducing access to firearms, especially for the cognitively impaired, increasing neighborhood safety and household security, and improving health care options for those with chronic debilitating illnesses.”
The Alzheimer’s Association recommends that individuals with Alzheimer’s should not handle, or have access to, guns. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has produced informative materials on dementia and firearm safety, as well, indicating that it sees the issue as a cause for concern.
Anyone who has tried to convince an elderly parent to stop driving knows how difficult such conversations can be. And cars don’t carry the emotional, cultural and political power that firearms do — especially when the subject is whether or not to take away Grandpa’s gun.
Do you have an older loved one who owns firearms? Do you worry about his safety, or the safety of others? Have you addressed it?
Read more about The Public's Health.
no .... d'uh !— the_chief- What a dumb article. All speculation and conjecture. Sometimes common sense does not cut it. If the elderly are a problem please site the statistics and stop the opionin making.— cb54
- WOW,what happened to the days of journalistic integrity. It seems that there would be at least one fact to support the claim this author is making. If you click on the hyperlinks included in the article, it is all about, we studied, or we analized. There is no hard numbers brought forth. I must know a minumum of 200 men and women who own firearms, and none of them have been involved in a murder or suicide. The facts in the matter are that guns do save lives. You here every day of an elderly person who rightfully shot somebody who broke into their homes and was going to harm them.— dougcpht
- If you bother to read the full paper in the American Journal of Public Health, you'll find that it's based entirely upon data sourced from the CDC and other publications (those "hard numbers" you claim are lacking). Now if you consider those data inferior to your own opinion and anecdotal experience, then I can't help you. — KnightofInfiniteResignation
- Good response, Knight.
What they ought to consider is dementia (where a parent doesn't know you or where he is) and despondency due to dementia onset with a loaded gun - in shaky, frightened or irrationally angry hands (all hand in hand symptoms)... and then having that live within their family unit.
— alliemichelle - I absolutely love it. Here go the Liberal know it alls with their next attempt to ban guns all together. I haven't seen anything in the second ammendment to the Constitution that excludes those over 65. Any new law which would leave the decision of mental compentance for gun ownership and posession could and would be abused by anti gun activists and liberal goverments either locally or nationally and should be declared Unconstitutional.— rfitz
- what a waste of time and money. let's speculate and preemptively makes laws and studies. liberals are pathetic.— iliveinoldcity26
- what a waste of time and money. let's speculate and preemptively makes laws and studies. liberals are pathetic.— iliveinoldcity26
- An article on Philly.com bashing guns? Never thought I would see the day!— cjn35
- No statistics on how many suicides or accidental deaths or accidental injuries caused by person 65 or older with gun. You know why? Because if they have the numbers they are minuscule. You know why I know that? Cause if they were big they would be splashed all over the headline. My dad taught me gun safety, he then taught my son when he was 70 years old. He is gone now and my son and I love to sit and talk about the fun we had, dad, me, my son, and uncle (dad's brother). We would go target shooting. and dare I say it hunting. So please just shut up already because you know not what you speak of, TOOLS.
— puddydawg - Uh, I've considered the number of folks I loved who have been lost to "medical misadventures". Judging by the numbers, I think I'd rather Granpa have a gun than a doctor's visit. Let's ban doctors.— WOP2
