PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
comments
5
options
 
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Let us now praise a famous  man, Paul Newman, who was more than a movie star in the pantheon of great movie stars. He was a sublime actor, an indelible cinematic character and a man of immense charity and purpose.

He died at the age of 82, leaving behind a legacy rarely rivaled in Hollywood history. Foremost, because he didn't live in Hollywood but in rural Connecticut and kept company with the same wife, the glorious Joanne Woodward, for many, many decades.  He always said she was the more talented of the two, an uxurious stance that endeared him to multiple generations of women even more.

Newman treated his surreal good looks -- he was the Brad Pitt and George Clooney of his day -- as something to overcome rather than exploit. He preferred to play the outsider, the ne'er do well, rather than the hero and simple rake, though he had more pluck and charm than any actor in recent memory.

Newman didn't coast on stardom. He used it do support his true interests. He did small films. He directed. He raced cars and refused to play the Hollywood game. He never risked turning into Tony Curtis, who let his game go flat after so much promise.

Newman never seemed to care about the money or the ephemeral, extravagant flippery of fame except in that it allowed him to be more independent and philanthropic. (Like his dear friend and co-star Robert Redford, though the Sundance Kid has always seemed less generous as an actor and a human being skilled at interpersonal relationships.)

How many actors have raised $200 million for charity, children with cancer foremost among his concerns, with less craving for gratitude?  Elizabeth Taylor has done wonders for Aids charities, but she expected to be treated as royalty while living like a princess. Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are doing their share, but with the cameras always zoning in on the white heat of their fame and, even worse, their children.

Newman did it all with characteristic humilty and humor.

If you're lucky, you get to experience the thrill of such a great star, a great man, and a beautiful human being in every sense of the word every half century or so.

 
Posted by Karen Heller @ 10:28 PM  Permalink | 5 comments
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:04 AM, 09/29/2008
    They don't make 'em like that anymore. Truly one of the greats ever to grace the big screen.
    KarenA
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:08 AM, 09/30/2008
    He is a nice person and very popular like a film star I am very lucky to know about him. .............. Crystal Met Addiction
    eeaton
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:01 PM, 09/30/2008
    One of the greatest actors and humanitarians of our time. What's with the rest of the entertainment world? What are the rest of them giving back?
    voiceofreason
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:37 PM, 10/08/2008
    it was never about him...it was about the cause. maybe today's "celebs" can read the cliff notes from newman's own.
    natedog
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:29 AM, 10/09/2008
    yes, yes, yes! and a few months before his death he and his partner met to discuss how to guarantee the continuance of the charities. i'm not a movie fan but have always kept an eye on Mr Newman. it was such a pleasure just to know of his existence. and he was SOOOOOOOOO HANDSOME.
    fryb


5 comments
About Karen Heller
This week Karen Heller is live-blogging the Republican convention in true blogger style - at home, surfing the Web and watching TV. She's covered five other conventions. Three were Republican, two were Democratic. Read all of Populist here.

Karen Heller has interviewed Philip Roth and Zsa Zsa Gabor, spent time with Pink and the Philadelphia Orchestra, the celebrated and the exemplary unsung. She's covered Miss America and political conventions. She's been a provocative voice at The Inquirer for nearly 20 years, garnering awards for criticism, feature writing and investigative reporting, and was a finalist for the 2001 Pulitzer Prize in commentary.