Larry Eichel reports...
In a conference call this morning, the Clinton camp tried to alter the expectations game in Pennsylvania and the definition of what would be success or failure for the two Democratic presidential candidates on April 22.
The consensus within the political community has been that Hillary Rodham Clinton had to take the state big, perhaps by double digits, to be able to claim that she'd won it a way that matters in the overall nomination struggle -- given her deficits in both the delegate race and the overall popular voter. But her strategists say that such thinking should not apply, now that Barack Obama has completed a six-day bus tour of the states and has outspent Clinton by a huge margin on television commercials.
Howard Wolfson, Clinton's communications director, said: "Pennsylvania, absent the resource differential, ought to be a fair fight for the two candidates." He noted that Pennsylvania is a swing state in a general election and, in some senses, a microcosm of the country. For Obama, he said, failure to win it would raise renewed questions about the Illinois senator's ability to win big states and to close the deal with voters.
"Sen. Obama ought to be able to win. I think they expect to win," Wolfson said. "If they fail to win there, they will have failed in Pennsylvania."
In other words, now that "the Obama campaign is now fully engaged in the fight for Pennsylvania," as Wolfson put it, Clinton shouldn't be held to any margin-of-victory standard on April 22. Said Wolfson for those who might not have gotten the point: "I believe that a win is a win."
And to wrap it up, a final video from the Obama bus tour:
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/multimedia/17270819.html




