Reaction to my recent column about the economic-stimulus payments ran the gamut.
Several people said I erred in the amount of the check. I used the maximum $600 per person but neglected to point out caveats that may lower the amount you receive. Too many, in fact, to list here. But they boil down to how much you make in a year.
For example, if you are single with adjusted gross income of more than $75,000, you’ll get less than the $600.
The IRS will send a letter telling you how it calculated your payment. I got mine last week and it was very clear.
Other people called with specific questions about how their personal situations might affect the amount of their check. One woman said her husband died in March but the IRS sent her a check that contained payments for both of them. Did she have to give his share back?
Good question and I found a clue to the answer on the IRS’ Web sit where it prominently lists “Rebate Payment Questions.”
But I’m not the taxman and I don’t even play one on TV, so I advised her to call the IRS’ toll-free number (1-800-829-1040).
She called me back to say that she was told she does get to keep that money because her husband was alive during the 2007 tax filing year.
Finally, one reader took issue with my calling this “found” money. His point was that the government isn’t really giving us anything, it’s simply taking less.
And he called it what is: a massive redistribution scheme to funnel money from those who will not receive checks (because they make too much money) to those who will get checks.
He’s right, and that’s exactly the intention: Get billions of dollars into the hands of people more likely to spend it than to save it.
Will the average American do that? Probably. After all, the warm weather is here, the kids are getting out of school. Buying new patio furniture sure sounds a lot more fun than paying off that credit-card balance from the last Christmas shopping season.
As for me, the IRS last week directly deposited my payment into my checking account, but I’ll be moving it into a money market fund this week.
- Philly Skyline
- Delaware Business Blog
- PlanPhilly
- Changing Skyline
- Dangerously Awesome
- Greater Philly chamber
- Consumer Inq
- Freakonomics
- Oddly Enough
- Philly PharmaBio Blog
- Physicians News Digest
- Pharmalot
- BloggingStocks
- 10Q Detective
- PhiLAWdelphia
- Delaware Corp Litigation Blog
- Philadelphia Forward
- Great Expectations
- SEPTA Watch
- PhillyFuture
- Comcast Must Die
- Philly Geeks
- Philadelphia Tech News
- Broadband Reports
- Phila Road Warrior
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008







Mike Armstrong, a business editor and writer for nearly two decades, is the Inquirer's business columnist and PhillyInc blog editor. Contact Mike 