As the site of the next Group of 20 economic summit in September, Pittsburgh is getting a lot of attention.
But is the western Pennsylvania city a national model of how to shake off the rust and embrace the “new economy,” whatever that is? Or is it still struggling with economic forces beyond its control?
The answer is both. For the last four decades, Pittsburgh has been making the painful adjustment to an economy less reliant on manufacturing.
It is home to a cluster of what we now call “green companies,” in large part thanks to the long-gone success of the steel industry that still defines the city. Pollution from steel manufacturing had grown so bad that during the ’50s political and civic leaders acted to clean up the air and water. Got lemons? Make lemonade.
On Tuesday, the liberal think tank Institute for America’s Future issued a report that attributes the economic diversification of the seven-county Pittsburgh area to “industrial planning” by government and private industry.
By industrial planning, the Washington, D.C., group means Pittsburgh’s Regional Economic Revitalization Initiative of the early ’90s, overseen by the Allegheny Conference on Community Development. Its goals read a lot like those pursued by other regions, including our own.
But the process of crafting Pittsburgh’s “critical elements for success” spawned coordination among all sorts of constituencies, coordination that eludes many regions, including our own.
“Pittsburgh has much to teach us,” the Institute for America’s Future says. But the group thinks the little-told story is the evolution of manufacturing in western Pennsylvania.
I’ll take United Steelworkers president Leo Gerard at his word when he describes Allegheny Technologies Inc.’s steel mill there as “high-tech, almost space-like.” But like Philadelphia, “eds and meds” have been the real growth engine with 230,700 jobs, not manufacturing, which employs 89,200 people.
So while the G-20 summit goes on, some attendees may tour the region’s steel mills or Carnegie Mellon University’s Robotics Institute. Others may wander over to the latest example of industrial planning: The $780 million Rivers Casino that opened on Saturday, creating 1,080 jobs.
The Rivers Casino is definitely not an example of industrial planning. First, it is not industrial, it is predatory and will cause a net loss in jobs and will bust a hole in the municipal budget. Second, there wasn't any planning involved. The think tank report, which focuses on ways to help Pittsburgh's economy, didn't even mention the casino: http://www.ourfuture.org/files/pittsburgh-rest-of-the-story.pdf NotADoneDeal
Industrial policy???? Where? If you look around the region, there is nothing but slowly dying induastries. Western Pa has steadily lost population and jobs for years. Pittsburch has had a slight uptick in jobs, but very little. The real truth is the State has an anit-business policy especially the tax policies that penilize compnies that buy capital equipment. The best jobs for those who do not have a college dreww are still manufacturing, but where are they? No in PA. The total number of "green" manufacturing jobs, so beloved by Rendell and Obama, is under 2500. By counting the staffs handling environment paper work or clean ups, they inflate the totals to look better, but the real truth is there is nothing there. Rendell, the Democrats and their "bankers" (aka casino and lawyer #$@$) think "industrial " policy is a parisite entity that strips money out of the community without creating anything. With the threat of Obama care and the sever restriction on pay and services to follow, you do not want to base your economy on the healthcare industry. oldduchman
Hah hah! Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. I am the great and powerful casino "industry" that will save your town! So bring me the best you have and when youse suckers finally wake up it'll be too late and then you'll see the pathetic balloon full of hot air and empty promises. Ha ha ha. Suckers!! Enjoy! mobbed up casino owner
- Philly Skyline
- Delaware Business Blog
- PlanPhilly
- Changing Skyline
- Dangerously Awesome
- Greater Philly chamber
- Consumer Inq
- Freakonomics
- Oddly Enough
- Philly PharmaBio Blog
- Physicians News Digest
- Pharmalot
- BloggingStocks
- 10Q Detective
- PhiLAWdelphia
- Delaware Corp Litigation Blog
- Philadelphia Forward
- Great Expectations
- SEPTA Watch
- PhillyFuture
- Comcast Must Die
- Philly Geeks
- Philadelphia Tech News
- Broadband Reports
- Phila Road Warrior
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008














Mike Armstrong, a business editor and writer for nearly two decades, is the Inquirer's business columnist and PhillyInc blog editor. Contact Mike 