Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
TEXT SIZE: A A A A
Email this post | Back to Blog home
Friday, May 9, 2008
Hospitals want Justice Dept. to block Blue Cross, Highmark merger

The American Hospital Association wants the U.S. Justice Department to block the merger of Pennsylvania's two biggest health insurers.

The hospital advocacy organization expresses concern that the combination of Pittsburgh's Highmark Inc. and Philadelphia's Independence Blue Cross would lead to a "huge accumulation of market power."

You can read the association's letter to the Justice Department here.

It's been more than a year since the two big insurers announced they wanted to merge. Pennsylvania's Insurance Department has yet to hold hearings on the transaction, but officials indicate that they will likely occur this summer.

The American Hospital Association represents 5,000 hospitals, including many in Pennsylvania that fear a bigger insurer would be able to cut reimbursement for health-care services. The letter says:

An IBC/Highmark combination could easily use its enormous market power to drive reimbursement below competitive levels and to force anticompetitive contract terms on providers.

The association also says that if a bigger Blue Cross gets too powerful "advances in quality and performance" at hospitals could be limited. It also questions whether any of the savings from the combination would ever trickle down to consumers.

As of last December, the Pennsylvania Insurance Department said that it could render a final decision on the combination by the end of 2008.

Posted by Mike Armstrong @ 4:03 PM  Permalink | 3 comments
SAVE AND SHARE
Comments
Posted by dwightS 09:49 PM, 05/09/2008
Great post! http://www.PackageFromSanta.com
Posted by mk 10:55 PM, 05/09/2008
I am a Highmark subscriber from the State College area that uses the Rothman Institute at Jeff. Until mid March 08, Highmark contracted with the RI as an "in-network facility". The contract ran out and Highmark has refused to renew it. Highmark is way larger than IBC so look for some severe cuts in who the new company will consider to be "in-network" and how many physician groups will be dropped. HM has a very low reimbursement rate to MD's and will try to drive it lower so their profits increase....as if they aren't scandalous already...especially for a supposed "non-profit" organization. The Emergency Room physician group at the Mt.Nittany Medical Center (State College hospital) dropped accepting HM years ago and many other staff MD's have also dropped out of the plan...Unfortunately, HM is the 800lb gorilla in west/central and western PA and will only get worse after sucking up IBC...
Posted by paman 03:38 PM, 05/10/2008
Remember Capital Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Central PA? Highmark is the Blue Shield part that split off, because the executives of Capital Blue Shield lost out in a political game at Capital. Then they went on a merger binge, and in checking the rates I found the place where highmark makes lots of money is in everything but the Blue Cross Health function. Its the Dental insutance and the extras where they rake in the moola. This is why it is really tough in the Highmark area where we are served by either Captial or Highmark to get traditional Blue Cross/Blue Shield functions from Highmark without having to buy all the extras. THus we stuck with Capital Blue Cross. I would stay clare of Highmark, and from what I have seen out in Central PA I would be worried with the concnetation of power, adn espcially with exectuives that make as much or more than exectuvies in Fortune 500 companies
3 comments
About Philly Inc
Mike Armstrong, a business editor and writer for nearly two decades, is the Inquirer's business columnist and PhillyInc blog editor.