Thursday, November 26, 2015

Highmark, Independence merger debate goes to Washington

Competition of Pennsylvania's health insurance market is the focus of a Senate judiciary subcommittee hearing.

Highmark, Independence merger debate goes to Washington


If an insurer refuses to compete in a certain market, is it still a potential competitor in that market?

Theoretically, yes.

The question keeps coming up as the pending merger between Highmark Inc. and Independence Blue Cross gets dissected in public settings.

Thursday's venue was Washington as Sen. Arlen Specter led a hearing on the consolidation of Pennsylvania’s health insurance industry. At two hours, it was the CliffsNotes’ version of what the state Insurance Department did over four days in July.

But it was no less illuminating to hear the Republican senator question the two CEOs as well as experts from the insurance and hospital industries about the effect on consumers.

Why don’t the two nonprofit health insurers compete in each other’s territory? Wouldn’t the competition be healthy in driving down premiums or at least holding back the rate of increase?

The insurers themselves tell us that they don’t want to battle each other, that it would be costly to do so.

Sam Marshall, president of the Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania, told the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights that allowing the combination would discourage other commercial insurers from making the investment to compete with them.

“Consumers can be harmed by the absence of the checks and balances and safety valves that come from a competitive market,” said Marshall, whose group represents commercial insurers.

Agreeing not to compete - as Highmark and Independence have done for more than a decade - would be unacceptable in auto insurance, for example. Why has it been tolerated in Pennsylvania?

Probably for the same reasons we tolerate going to state stores and state budgets passed at midnight. Some sides want things to change, other forces don’t.

Same with health insurance. Opponents see this deal as the last chance to bring change to the market.

Does anyone believe that if Insurance Commissioner Joel Ario turns down the merger, Highmark will start selling in Philadelphia?

Inquirer Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Mike Armstrong Inquirer Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter