Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
TEXT SIZE: A A A A
Email this post | Back to Blog home
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Saving Ryan

Ryan Howard homered to left field yesterday in an 8-2 loss to the Giants at AT&T Park.

Good sign?

Typically, it is. But lately those opposite field hits haven't translated into Howard breaking out of his slump. He enters today's series finale against the Giants hitting just .169 with seven homers and 17 RBIs. Worried? I still think it's too early to be really, truly worried. You have to look at Howard's track record and assume at some point he will break out of it.

Jim Salisbury looks at Howard's slump in today's Inquirer.

"He looks like a lost person at the plate," said a major-league scout who has seen a bunch of Howard's at-bats this season. "It looks like he's guessing every pitch, like he's trying not to strike out instead of hitting the ball."

"He's not swinging at strikes. He's chasing bad balls," Charlie Manuel said. "He's not following the ball. He's not staying on it. He's swinging too early and missing it by a lot. He's trying too hard and digging himself a big hole. It's like he gets up there and says, 'I've got to hit a home run.' It looks like he's trying to get 10 hits in one at-bat."

"It's mental," Mike Schmidt said. "But what you go through leads to physical problems. Instead of waiting and trying to smoke that ball right out of the catcher's mitt, you lose your sense of how to do that. I'm sure Ryan's mind is playing some tricks on him. You miss balls you should be driving, and you get frustrated. It's tough to figure out how to get it back."

*

Nobody knows about bad slumps more than Pat Burrell, who hit .209 with 21 homers and 64 RBIs in 2003. Here's what he had to say about it Thursday:

Q: Did everybody seem to have the answer for you?
A: That's part of the natural process of playing and struggling. People are always going to try to help because that's the nature of the game. But that's a small part of things. The biggest thing is trying to decide what it is that you're going to do about it. We try all kinds of different things. Sometimes it's daily. It's just different things you're trying to do, trying to get a better feel for things. Now when you're not getting results it makes it tough to stick with something that's not working. But you know, you just keep grinding away. I don't know if there is a clear cut answer for what the best way is. You've got to consistently work at it. You can't just assume that things are going to change. It might just be a little thing, but if you consistently get your work done, a lot of times that can make you feel a little more comfortable. If you go into the game with a good mindset sometimes and get a break here and there, the next thing you know you get a couple hits and you start getting into some good counts and things turn around. But I think most important thing is you have to continue to work and look for whatever that piece is that isn't there. And he does that. It is hard. It's especially hard because the other team is paying attention, too. And they can smell blood, so it's a tough situation. He's a hugely talented player, and that's going to help. It's just a matter of keep going and staying with it. Because in the big picture you can make up a lot of ground.

Q: Do you end up second guessing yourself a lot in a slump?
A: That's part of the maturing process as a player. You go through that period of struggle for a while and over time you start to learn, 'Hey, this is what I'm doing. This is what I've got to do to get out of it.' And the most important thing is not try to do too much and let the game come to him. And that's also hard. For a guy they don't throw a lot of strikes to anyway, combined with a guy that swings a lot ... He'll be fine. Is it important for him to get on track? Absolutely."

Q: Could you be a better player today after surviving those struggles in 2003?
A: I don't know. Maybe. I'd take the opposite. I'd take not having to deal with it, but sometimes we don't get to choose that. What's done is done, that's the most important thing. Yesterday is over. Today is a new day. You have to find out what you have to do to be prepared. Know who's pitching and what they've done in the past with you. All those things help. The more information you have the more prepared you're going to be. That's never a bad thing. With him it's such a fine line. It could turn around in one day.

Q: Remember any random people giving you advice?
A: I was having lunch with a guy, who was doing an interview. And a guy walked up to the table and said, 'Hey, Pat, sorry to interrupt you guys while you're eating, but stop swinging at the (bleeping) slider.' And he walked out.

*

In the Phillies Notebook, more on Scott Mathieson and Chase Utley and Burrell struggling at the plate.

*

In The Inquirer's Sunday baseball column, Salisbury looks at some of the deals that are really paying off ... like Gavin Floyd, for example.

Posted by Todd Zolecki @ 1:16 PM  Permalink | 15 comments
SAVE AND SHARE
Comments
Posted by Norma 02:01 PM, 05/11/2008
"It looks like he's guessing every pitch, like he's trying not to strike out instead of hitting the ball.".......A major league scout had to tell us that? I KNEW that! LOL!
Posted by GregB486 04:21 PM, 05/11/2008
Seriously, what was I supposed to learn from Salisbury's article that everyone on the face of the earth didn't already know?
Posted by jimmymack 04:32 PM, 05/11/2008
Boy, did Manual sum it up or what? Sounds like the exchange between Cheech and Kevin Costner in "Tin Cup" on why he was shanking the ball. Charlie is the man.
Posted by Mark1npt 07:31 PM, 05/11/2008
Pitiful, just absolutely pitiful......multiple strikeouts again today...and we weren't even facing any good pitching.....it's one thing to look like horsebleep against another team's ace but this guy?
Posted by Clinton, NJ 07:34 PM, 05/11/2008
I love the Burrell story about going to lunch, thats great!!! Lets hope this homestand gets these guys going, cause they need to start hitting!
Posted by MrPhillie 08:11 PM, 05/11/2008
I hope the writers do not pin this loss on romero. Sheesh, the guy gives up one home run...so what. The reason the Phillies lost is because their heralded offense failed to show up yet again. This is a story that repeats itself over and over again. Agree with Mark1npt...if they were facing a stud pitcher, I can give them a pass. However, that is rarely the case. For as much as this offense was talked up...by writers, fans, and the players themselves, they should be embarrassed by their woefully inconsistent production. The lineup as a whole has been awful. Please guys, start playing like we think you can...like you said you will.
Posted by Norma 09:14 PM, 05/11/2008
I loved Pat's lunch story, too!
Posted by Norma 09:17 PM, 05/11/2008
At least Chase got a hit. And how about Howard's triple! First one in almost 2 years.
Posted by Norma 09:19 PM, 05/11/2008
I'm wondering if their day off should be spent in BP. Unfortunately, since it will be pouring all day, it would have to be in the cages.
Posted by Clinton, NJ 09:53 PM, 05/11/2008
They need something to get them going. I dont like the platoon in right anymore, that may be a problem. I think Jenkins should get more AB's. He's a ten year vet, I think he can handle playing everyday. I like Werth, but I think a consistent lineup might help, that way guys know they'll be out there eveyday and dont have to worry about not playing. I could be wrong, could be quite the opposite were things need to be shook up and a few 'starters' benched to see what others can do while those 'starters' work out the kinks in their game....just a thought!
Posted by KarenA 10:24 AM, 05/12/2008
Probably too much to hope for with Howard getting HR on Saturday and a triple on Sunday?! Clinton NJ-like you're line-up idea. Certainly can't hurt.
Posted by Bama 10:58 AM, 05/12/2008
Can we find that arbitrator that gave Howard $10 million and wring his neck? What about all the sports writers that said the Phillies were too cheap to pay Howard what he's worth? Right now he's worth about $1.98!
Posted by Truth 12:22 PM, 05/12/2008
It's really funny to read YOU bloggers discussing this line up. This has been a strike out/LOB heavy line up for years. This is why they can't win playoffs. YOUR Phillies are basically a .500 team. Every year everyone on the roster gets hot for 2-3 wks and they win 12 outta 15 or 9 in a row and they catch up and take the lead in the wild card or division. Last year it just happened at the tail end of the season. The Phillies w/out that singular spurt they have every year are nothing more than your run of the mill team.
Posted by Norma 01:22 PM, 05/12/2008
I've never been a huge fan of platooning. I get the whole pitting lefties and righties. But more at-bats, and the security of knowing you're playing everyday, could trump that.
Posted by Billy The Kid 11:31 AM, 05/13/2008
Truth, couldn't you say EVERY major league team is a .500 team without the "spurt". What sets the average and bad teams apart from the good ones is the ability to go out and run off two or three weeks of playing .750 ball. The Mets did it in the beginning of the season last year and the Phillies did it at the end of last year...and how do you know they "can't win" in the playoffs. They've been there one time. Is that really enough for you to label them as a team that can't win in the playoffs? If the 2006 Cardinals, an 83 win team, can win the World Series, ANYBODY can win in the playoffs.
15 comments
About Todd Zolecki
Todd Zolecki is in his sixth season covering the Phillies. Born and raised in Milwaukee – he suffered through the Packers’ crushing loss to the Giants in the NFC Championship game at Lambeau Field in January – he graduated from the University of Minnesota with a journalism degree.