share
email
print
font size
options
 
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Ryan Howard: Snubbed on one NL MVP ballot.

There were 32 voters for the National League's Most Valuable Player Award.

Ryan Howard received votes from 31 of them.

Let that sink in for a moment. Thirty-one of 32 voters put Howard somewhere on their ballot, which has room for 10 players. But one voter didn't think Howard, who led the majors in home runs (48) and RBIs (146) and led his team to its second consecutive National League East championship (keep in mind these votes come before the postseason), even ranked among the top 10 most valuable players in the National League.

I was curious about that, so I called Rich Campbell from the Fredericksburg (Va.) Free Lance Star, who left Howard off his ballot, to ask why.

Campbell declined comment.

But what could he say?

He forgot?

Regardless of his reason, it's embarrassing not to have Howard somewhere on the ballot because anybody who followed baseball, especially the final month of the season, knew how valuable Howard was for the Phillies. Here is how Campbell's ballot looked: 1) Albert Pujols, 2) David Wright, 3) Lance Berkman, 4) Chase Utley, 5) Hanley Ramirez, 6) Tim Lincecum, 7) Chipper Jones, 8) Matt Holliday, 9) Johan Santana, 10) Manny Ramirez.

Now, it should be noted that Campbell's vote (or lack of vote) wouldn't have changed the result, but the BBWAA, which prides itself on its voting body, suffered another black eye, in my opinion. First, three uninformed voters gave Cincinnati Reds pitcher Edinson Volquez second-place votes for the NL Rookie of the Year Award. That would be OK, except Volquez is not a rookie. And not to have Howard anywhere on your MVP ballot? Terrible.

*

Phil Sheridan thinks the BBWAA should no longer vote for postseason awards, based on the embarrassing Howard and Volquez votes ... and a few other things, too. It's an interesting argument. Could the players, coaches and managers do better? They could, but it also would not be perfect. Remember, managers and coaches gave Bobby Abreu a Gold Glove in 2005 and Rafael Palmeiro a Gold Glove in 1999, when he played 135 games as a DH. How could that happen? Because sometimes these Gold Glove votes and Players Choice Awards go like this:

First coach, in a room full of coaches: "Hey, who's having a good year in right field?"
Second coach: "No clue."
Third coach: "I can't think of anybody."
Fourth coach: "Isn't Abreu having a good year?"
First coach: "Sounds good to me. He's my Gold Glover."

That said, the MLBPA voted Cliff Lee and Tim Lincecum as its pitchers of the year, Pujols and Josh Hamilton as its players of the year and Evan Longoria and Geovany Soto as its rookies of the year. That's on mark with the BBWAA, with the AL MVP to be announced later today.

*

The Phillies are interviewing coaching candidates this week. Jim Tracy, who had been a candidate, reportedly is close to a job with the Colorado Rockies. Scheduled to interview this week with the Phils are Terry Collins, Rich Donnelly, Tim Bogar and Pete Mackanin.

Sam Perlozzo already has been hired. Perlozzo and the final hire will be assigned to the bench and third-base coaching vacancies.

Posted by Todd Zolecki @ 12:47 AM  Permalink | 40 comments
40
Comments   
Posted 01:35 AM, 11/18/2008
jeff gross
so if the writers can't do the job, who should be deciding on these awards? Is it too much to ask the managers, and perhaps GM's to each cast a vote for the MVP, Cy Young, ROY etc?
Posted 07:50 AM, 11/18/2008
bski
Way to call Campbell out, Zo. Throw in Mark Zuckerman from the Washington Times, who put Howard 10th on his ballot, and we've got some serious anti-Howard bias from the Nationals beat writers. It really calls the whole process into question, IMO.
Posted 08:04 AM, 11/18/2008
Mark1npt
Every writer who classifies as a moron by leaving off an obvious top 10 guy or who demonstrates his ignorance by voting for a player not even eligible, should have their voting privelege revoked. It's that simple.....I wonder if these dufuses wrote in Alfred E. Newman on their Presidential ballots 3 weeks ago?
Posted 08:49 AM, 11/18/2008
Steve5877
This guy probably looked at each team and picked the MVP from each team. For the Phils, he gave it to Utley. Given how useless Howard was most of the season, hard to argue, but I'd have gone with Lidge. Chipper gets a vote 'cause the guys a homer. Holliday 'cause he should have won last year?? Oops, just noticed two Mutts. Yeah, he's an idiot.
Posted 08:50 AM, 11/18/2008
phillylawyer78
How does someone who writes for the Fredericksburg (Va.) Free Lance Star get a vote?? They've got to have a smaller circulation than the Daily Pennsylvanian, Philadelphia Weekly, or the Onion. Do those papers have writers that get votes?
Posted 08:52 AM, 11/18/2008
tom trochum
The most valuable player is that player who is so valuable that the team could not achieve what it did without him. The team's success would not be anywhere near what it was without him. The difference between the Phillies being a playoff contender and World Series Pretender was not Howard, Rollins, Hamels or Utley. It is Brad Lidge. He was perfect from the opening gun to the last game of the World Series. He is the difference between this year and the last. He made the Philles an eight inning team. He put constant pressure on the other teams to score late or forget it. He gave his team an air of confidence that the game was in the bag. He made the starters know they could air it out and not have to finish the game. Take him out of the equation and where would the 2008 World Champions be. Playing golf on the first week in October 2008. Probably never in real contention for National League wild Card. In other words, no where. That is why Brad Lidge deserved to be the National League MVP. He was most valuable, the biggest difference maker in his teams success, bar none.
Posted 08:56 AM, 11/18/2008
KarenA
Even a "front runner" fan of baseball would know how Howard lit up the score board at the end of the season and should receive a vote or two for MVP. Must be watching all those losing Nats games that put this guy in a "coma".
Posted 09:04 AM, 11/18/2008
timm2
wow, nothing else to say about it.
Posted 09:36 AM, 11/18/2008
EL Zorro
Jeff, including GMs in the voting process is not a good idea. Remember, they are the ones who negotiate the contracts, which many of them include performance bonuses. So that will be a conflict of interest. I would rather see a system where ex managers, coaches and ex writers will be included. I think active writers – and manager and coaches for that matter - are too closed to players one way or another. Some my have a problem with a certain player or certain team, as evident by the two Washington beat writers who snubbed Howard. Maybe the bad blood between the Nats and Phillies have something to do with that. How about the New York guys? I also think a lot of today’s writers put too much emphasis in stats like OPS and other stuff, that while it tells you something about the players performances, it doesn’t tell the whole story. I read a while ago that one guy, who writes a book every year about players’ stats like range and stuff like that, rated Rollins as in the middle of the pack in terms of range. Are you kidding me? Name one shortstop with more range? Maybe Reyes and Furcal? Who else? The guy writes that and all Rollins does is win Gold Gloves and one MVP.
Posted 09:56 AM, 11/18/2008
EL Zorro
Tom, for Lidge to save a game, the team has to be in front. Howard had a lot to do with that this season. And Howard is an everyday player. You can't ignore that.
Posted 10:53 AM, 11/18/2008
MFPhils
the players should decide...we are the ones who care
Posted 11:18 AM, 11/18/2008
PhillyTheKid
Pujols Shmooholes...He's a hitting freak, like Manny, but the Silver Slugger Award should take care of that, NOT the MVP... As for the Phils, Ryan Howard carried us down the stretch, but the pitching STAFF was the key to being WORLD F--king Champions!
Posted 11:19 AM, 11/18/2008
jeff gross
I accept the notion that GMs have a conflict. I would institute the rule that you can't vote for someone on your team. The ex managers etc sounds reasonable, but how do you ensure they see enough games/players to make informed choice? They also have a bias in favor/against certain teams/Players. What we need is a multi layered system whereby Current managers, past managers and players, Writers now and past all get a vote...or of course just give the award to the guy with the best stats during the regular season and call it the Best player of teh year award (BPY)
Posted 12:01 PM, 11/18/2008
Chewy59
Yea but Jeff Gross, what about people who will be free agents? You vote for a guy and then sign him? Or you will still find GM's with vendettas against other teams in the division. They will say, if my guy isn't gonna win MVP I sure as hell will make sure it won't be his guy. Or, they fired me so I won't vote for their guy. I just think anyone actively involved like that is prone to misjudgement and letting team or personal rivalries get in the way. Personally, I don't have any suggestions for a better system than letting the writers vote.
Posted 12:14 PM, 11/18/2008
EL Zorro
Jeff, they don't have to see all the games. They are going to have an idea who the candidates are by midseason and then take a close look at them and see how they and the team finish. I know is not easy to get a fair system. One start will be to really define the MVP. Obviously there are diferrent opinions about the award. Or just create another for the guys with the best stats for National League and American League Players of the Year and you solve the controversies.
About Andy Martino
Andy Martino is in his first season on the Phillies beat. A former New York City public school teacher and graduate of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, he previously wrote for the New York Daily News, where he covered baseball and worked with the award-winning investigative sports "I-team."
PHILLIES SCOREBOARD