Saturday, August 29, 2015

Hamels gets W despite control issues

WASHINGTON -- If you wanted to give Cole Hamels a letter grade for his seasonal debut Wednesday night against the Washington Nationals, you'd need three letters.

Hamels gets W despite control issues

0 comments

WASHINGTON -- If you wanted to give Cole Hamels a letter grade for his seasonal debut Wednesday night against the Washington Nationals, you'd need three letters.

The first two: O and K.

The last one: W.

"He had trouble with his command," manager Charlie Manuel said after Hamels allowed three runs -- two earned -- in five innings. "He'll have better stuff once he gets his command down. He walked four and he was behind the hitters a lot. In order for him to go deep into the game, he'll have to pitch better than that early. For his first time out, he was O.K."

Hamels left after five innings with a 6-3 lead because he had thrown 103 pitches and only 63 of them were strikes. Despite pitching just O.K., he did pick up the W because the Phillies' offense, which included an RBI single from Hamels, collected 11 more hits and eight more runs, giving them 20 runs and 24 hits in their first two games.

The only truly bad inning for Hamels was the bottom of the third when he threw an 0-1 sinker that Ian Desmond blasted over the center-field wall for a two-out home run.

"It was a straight sinker," Hamels said. "It didn't sink."

Hamels said that was the only sinker he threw the entire night.

"It's a work in progress," Hamels said. "I don't have a Roy Halladay sinker yet."

After the home run, Hamels issued consecutive walks to Ryan Zimmerman and Adam Dunn before giving up an RBI single to Josh Willingham.

The Nationals scored an unearned run in the fourth when Nyjer Morgan reached on a two-out error by Ryan Howard and Desmond followed with an RBI double. Howard made up for his miscue in the fifth with a two-run homer that gave Hamels and the Phillies a 6-3 lead, making a winner of Hamels.

"No matter what it looks like, you just have to battle," Hamels said. "It's not always going to be clear and clean when you're not able to hit your spots."

It was O.K. It was a W.

Inquirer Columnist
0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Jake Kaplan Inquirer Staff Writer
Bob Brookover Inquirer Columnist
Marc Narducci Inquirer Staff Writer
Matt Breen Inquirer Staff Writer
Latest Videos:
Also on Philly.com:
letter icon Newsletter