Saturday, May 25, 2013
Saturday, May 25, 2013

Dissecting craziness

News blogs, sports blogs, entertainment blogs, and more from Philly.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer and the Philadelphia Daily News.

53 comments

Dissecting craziness

POSTED: Thursday, May 3, 2012, 12:49 AM
(AP Photo/John Bazemore) (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

ATLANTA — Begin with this: The Phillies scored 13 runs Wednesday. Sure enough, they lost, for the first time since 1969 when scoring that many. (Or 1993 if we're counting the postseason.)

But they hadn't scored at least 13 since July 10, 2011 and only twice total in the last two seasons. That, Charlie Manuel said, will be what helps motivate for a quick turnaround in Thursday's 12:10 p.m. series finale after a 15-13 loss in 11 innings Wednesday.

"It can be deflating," Manuel said, "but I look at the other side, too. We scored 13 runs and got some hits. We did some things good in the game. That just goes to show you we can score runs and we can get hits."

The Phillies fouled off 18 pitches in the first three innings. Tommy Hanson was done after 3 1/3 inning and 95 pitches. They beat up on the soft underbelly of the Braves bullpen once they forced the starter to leave.

Carlos Ruiz drove in seven runs, more than any Phillies catcher in a single game ever. Shane Victorino and Placido Polanco each had three hits. John Mayberry Jr. showed some life as a pinch-hitter again and scored two runs. In the ninth, down by one run, Juan Pierre drew a leadoff walk, stole second, moved to third on a groundout, and scored on an infield single.

And that's about where the silver linings end. Just ask Roy Halladay, who was most upset when Ruiz's name was mentioned.

"He's been awesome for us," Halladay said. "That's what hurts the most when you have games like this. Your teammates are out there grinding and getting it done. And I didn't. That was the difference."

So start with Halladay. His velocity is not there, nor has it been for the entire first month of the season. But until Wednesday, it hadn't mattered. Opposing hitters were swinging and missing at 17 percent of his total strikes, which is above his average of 14 percent. He had limited his hits and home runs even as walks mounted.

His sinker velocity in April was 91.03 mph. It was 91.11 mph on Wednesday. His cutter velocity in April was 89.39 mph. It was 89.66 mph on Wednesday.

He needed just 47 pitches for the first four innings. That was not luck, he said. His stuff was working.

"It was good," he said.

Then it fell apart.

A few of the Atlanta hits were luck. Some were hit solidly. Halladay cited his pitch execution as the issue. Four of the six Braves hits were on cutters; the big blast was Brian McCann's grand slam. Halladay was trying to go in on McCann, where he had success before. The cutter caught too much of the plate.

"If we get it in there, I think we have a chance to get him out," Halladay said. "He was looking inner half and I left it middle-third, inner. That's a bad combination"

Why did he pitch the sixth? Halladay was at 82 pitches after the disastrous fifth inning. He said there was never a question he'd pitch the sixth.

"No," Halladay said. "The pitch count was down. I felt like I could go out and get us deeper and keep it right there. That was obviously the idea. If they felt like I was physically done, they would have taken me out."

Charlie Manuel echoed that idea.

"He had some left," Manuel said. "Where was his pitch count at? He still had some. We still thought he could pitch an inning or two and get us where we wanted to go."

And given the state of the Phillies' bullpen, logic says a longer leash for the team's best pitcher — even on his worst night — wasn't misguided.

Why were Michael Schwimer and Brian Sanches pitching in key moments? The short answer is: Halladay didn't go deep enough, his primary setup man was unavailable, and they never had a lead with three outs to go.

After pitching in three of four days and warming up in all four, Chad Qualls was unavailable. ("We could've probably made him pitch but we didn't want to," Manuel said. "We can't pitch him every night.") Jonathan Papelbon had also pitched in three of four days, but Manuel said his closer was sitting there had the Phillies carried the lead into the ninth inning.

Problem is, that never happened, mostly because Michael Schwimer failed to clean up Jose Contreras' mess. Atlanta scored five times in the eighth. Antonio Bastardo got them there and Ruiz extended the lead to four with his bases-clearing double.

Contreras might have escaped with only facing three batters had Jimmy Rollins executed a difficult double play feed behind the second-base bag. He should have had at least one out on the ball hit by Chipper Jones.

"Oh that was an easy double play," Rollins said. "At least I thought it was going to be an easy double play. Not necessarily easy, but for me. For me, that's an easy double play."

It was an error and two men on base instead. After another single and a walk, Contreras was done. 

Manuel had a decision: Schwimer or Sanches. That was the decision, he said, and not Jonathan Papelbon for a five-out save.

"We never do that," Manuel said. "It's just not the way it is. Papelbon is in the ninth inning for a save. When we ever have a lead, when we start the ninth inning, he's gonna save."

Sanches was just recalled but he spent the last three seasons in the majors with the Marlins and posted a 2.92 ERA. Schwimer had 16 2/3 innings in the majors to his name.

"Schwimer's got a little bit better fastball and a hook," Manuel said, "and we figured Schwimer might match better at that time."

He walked the first batter he faced on four pitches. Then Schwimer allowed three more runs to score and the Braves had the lead.

Once the game carried into extra innings, it was Sanches until Papelbon could pitch for a save. The chance never came.

On Sanches' 41st pitch, Jones crushed the game-winning home run.

"In that third inning obviously I was a little fatigued," Sanches said. "I started leaving the ball up a little bit. Because of that I battled trying to get it down. But that's no excuse."

And that about sums up Wednesday night at Turner Field.


Have a question? Send it to Matt Gelb's Mailbag.

53 comments
Comments  (53)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:07 AM, 05/03/2012
    Matt, this is a bunch of excuses. Paps going for a 5 out save is better than putting Schwimer in. Halladay was fatigued enough and had lost it. You don't leave any pitcher in after that.
    matthew76
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:23 AM, 05/03/2012
    It amuses me that Manuel often claims to ignore pitch counts when a pitcher goes over a certain number, citing the fact that other factors matter like pitches per inning, stress of the situations, etc. Yet, when a pitcher is having a rough time with heavy inning-by-inning workloands and is clearly spent with a low pitch count, the pitch count is tossed around as a reason for leaving him in. Do we ignore the pitch count or does it matter? Or does it only matter when it justifies bad decision making? That and the notion that your best reliever cannot pitch more than an innning and cannot dare come in if the team is not ahead even if putting in a far weaker pitcher loses the game gives me headaches. But that is a battle that won't be won any time soon.
    PhillyGuyinNY
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:31 AM, 05/03/2012
    Schwimer, who seems like a great guy, needs to go back to AAA to develop another pitch to show to lefties. With his current arsenal, Schwimer is simply not a big league calibre pitcher.
    Claudio Vernight
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:24 AM, 05/03/2012
    blah blah -- same b.s. for 5 years -- question is "Why do Phils have a manager who never has a clue when to take out a pitcher, who to put in , who to pinch hit, etc?" there is no other manager in basebll who woud have put in Schwimmer in that spot, and no intelligent fan who didn't know that the lead was lost when Chollie put Schwimmer in...it;s really just deja vous, as Schwimmer and Herndon failed repeatedly in that situation last year-- if Chollie is going to conduct "experiments" to see who can or cannot succeed in different situations maybe he should take notes of the resutls so he doesn't repeat the same mistakes over and over and over and over and over ....how anyone who has observed Chollie these past many years can make believe he has any clues about strategy or personnel is beyond me..it's a waste of time to even ask him the questions --he just randomly puts in pithcer and pinch hitters and makes out lineups with as much thought as a 4 year old taking random toys to see how they work
    warbiscuit
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:35 AM, 05/03/2012
    still waiting for an intelligent explanation as to why Chollie had Francisco hit against a righty in 2010 NLCS with man on 3rd and one out needing a run, when he had full bench, including Inanez and better contact hitters abvailable.... and then had Thome hit againt lefty in similar situation this year (Cliff Lee 10-inning scoreless gem)... can we all just concede tht Charlie Manuel doesn't know sh$# as to who put in and when
    warbiscuit
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:43 AM, 05/03/2012
    Did you notice Diekman just picked up his first win of the season for the Pigs on Wednesday. He is four for four in save situations and has struck out 20 in 12 innings giving up one earned run at AAA. Maybe Ruben can switch Dieker with either Savery, Sanches, Schwimer or Contreras. It's really not funny when a major league team has a reliever at AAA better than three or four of its guys it currently has in the bullpen.
    Dull
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:14 AM, 05/03/2012
    Watching Halladay personally blow a 6 run lead just proves that we got shafted in the Drabak trade. With Drabak and Cliff Lee we would have won this game bar none.
    lonewolf 10
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:14 AM, 05/03/2012
    Watching Halladay personally blow a 6 run lead just proves that we got shafted in the Drabak trade. With Drabak and Cliff Lee we would have won this game bar none.
    lonewolf 10
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:06 AM, 05/03/2012
    Halladay is not the ace of the team and the party may be over with him. Hamels better be signed now.
    shawnmac
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:07 AM, 05/03/2012
    Allowing Halladay to start the 6th was mind boggling. He was spent and looked worst physically that he did in Chicago last year. Cholly blew it again big time with his always less than stellar managing.
    LI PhilPhan
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:32 AM, 05/03/2012
    It didn't help that Halliday hustled down the first-base line on his final at bat. Then Rollins is out on the very next pitch. Give the guy a rest!
    Granny Hamner
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:16 AM, 05/03/2012
    Charlie seems like a good manager of personalities, but his on-field work is abominable.
    maximusud
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:37 AM, 05/03/2012
    The heat effects Roy in a big way. Agree with LI PhilPhan, he looked physically drained, even sitting in the dugout he was red and constantly wiping his face. Heat exhaustion? No excuse, but only Chooch knows for sure.
    dogman5
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:53 AM, 05/03/2012
    warbiscuit you do realize Charlie is the winningest manager in Phillies history right? I'm sure if you were managing, there would be ten thousand posts here per day pointing out your stupidity.
    Ron


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4
About this blog
The Phillies Zone is the place for up-to-the-minute Phillies coverage from the Inquirer.

Matt Gelb Inquirer Staff Writer
Bob Brookover Inquirer Baseball Columnist
Philly.com Sports Videos
Blog archives:
Past Archives: