Posted: Saturday, October 17, 2009, 8:58 AM | 36 comments |
 
options
 

Over the past two years, I've logged 70,000 miles in the air. That's the rougly the equivalent of flying around the equator three times. Or around C.C. Sabathia twice. Still, I get a little nervous flying. And by nervous, I mean when you see the guy clinging to the right leg of the flight attendant during takeoff, that's me. The anxiety -- I was thinking about therapy, but eventually concluded on my own that its roots lay in my desire to control everything in my environment, thereby saving myself several hundred dollars -- has lessened during my two seasons on the baseball beat. Still, I get a little antsy when I hear a new series of beeps over the plane's intercom system, convinced that, this time, it is a secret code informing the crew to prepare for imminent death. So when four long tones awakened me from my seated slumber aboard US Airways Flight 36 this morning -- it was around 1 a.m. California time, or 4 a.m. Eastern time, or 3 a.m. Denver time, and god knows what physiologic time -- I instinctively bolted upright. The tension was not eased by a flight attendant's voice asking if there were any doctors or nurses on board. Logic told me the flight attendant was not looking to put together a roundtable debate on medical ethics. Turns out, a lady had fainted after walking out of the bathroom -- I can only presume it was because she read my game story while seated on the John -- and whacked her head during her fall. I'm not sure if there were any doctors on board. Poor girl. She is passed out on the floor in need of a doctor, and all the only thing that the 100 or so media members on board are thinking is, "This damn plane better not get diverted to Chicago."

I thought about walking to the back and asking if somebody had called for a sports writer. But then I went back to sleep.

^

I'm sure few of you have any interest in re-hashing yesterday's melt-down in Los Angeles. And, really, what is there to re-hash? But I've already been asked this question several times, so I figure I'll go on record -- you can't fault Charlie Manuel for taking Pedro Martinez out of yesterday's game. Manuel said beforehand that he thought Martinez could throw up to 90 pitches. And the fact that he was able to get up to 87 in the blistering heat was impressive on its own. I talked to one Phillies pitcher yesterday who said the heat was oppressive. Martinez's last pitch was drilled by James Loney to the warning track. In a 1-0 game, all it takes is one fatigued pitch to tie things up. Chan Ho Park had pitched great the night before and had allowed just five hits in 26 career at-bats against the three batters he was due to face. Scott Eyre was still available. Manuel made the right move. He could have used Martinez to bunt Carlos Ruiz over to second and then left him in for the eighth with Park at the ready. But with a 1-0 lead, all it takes is one pitch.

More questionable, at least to me, was the decision to remove Ryan Madson and use J.A. Happ to face Andre Ethier. But when the Phillies decided that J.A. Happ would be used as a lefty reliever, these were the type of situations they needed to use him in. Ethier had just singled off of Madson the night before, and Happ was the most experienced lefty available. So even in that situation, it is tough to fault Manuel.

In the end, wins and losses fall on the shoulders of the players. And players are human, as we saw the night before when formerly-unhittable Dodgers lefty George Sherrill allowed a three-run home run to Raul Ibanez in Game 1. Chase Utley had a chance to make a routine play -- at least by Utley and Jimmy Rollins standards -- and didn't. Scott Eyre had a chance to retire a lefty hitter, which is his role, and didn't. Ronnie Belliard simply made a perfect bunt. Jim Thome did as Jim Thome does. When you are six outs away from a commanding 2-0 series lead and end up losing, the natural reaction is to point fingers. But sometimes, the other team simply beats you. This series was expected to go six or seven games for a reason -- and in Game 2, you witnessed that reason.

This seires will not be won or lost by the Game 2 melt-down. It will be won or lost by the performance of Cliff Lee in Game 3, and the Phillies ability to finally hit Hiroki Kuroda. It will be won or lost by Cole Hamels' performance in Game 5. Would a Game 2 win have helped immensely? Sure.

But the playoffs are all about perspective, about focusing one's attention on the things you can control, and ignoring the things that you can't.

Kind of like flying.

Posted by David Murphy @ 8:58 AM  Permalink | 36 comments
36
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:14 AM, 10/17/2009
    Sadly, this may have been, literally, and figuratively, Pedro's last moment in the sun, and Chase F. Utley tainted it forever.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:20 AM, 10/17/2009
    Well Said, Dave.
    robjan
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:22 AM, 10/17/2009
    I understand the anxiety, being "trapped" in a plastic-lined, metal tube with tiny windows and no idea of what's going on up front. I used to pilot airplanes myself. Now I ride in planes only when necessary to visit family. And I agree with your defense of Charlie.
    givemeabreak
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:29 AM, 10/17/2009
    anyone call for a sports writer...lol.
    oz
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:34 AM, 10/17/2009
    Murph, in your spare time, give Marcus a call and review "Sportswriting 101" with him. The guy needs help. Good job.
    mick314
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:00 AM, 10/17/2009
    I'm not blaming Charlie for this one. Chase was the culprit. But I’m sorry, but Pedro didn’t look spent to me. As a matter of fact, he looked more dominant as the game went on. He allowed 2 hits, and none since the 4th inning. He had only 3 Ks but all came from the 5th inning on, including the last one in the 7th Manny looked foolish with a nasty change up for the second out of the 7th. He retired 9 of the last 10 batters, the only on getting on base was Russell Martin by way of HPB. Pedro just went thru the middle of the order, and up next were Blake, Belliard and Martin. Those 3 shouldn’t strike any fear on any pitcher. I would at least let him start the inning. Charlie said he pulled Pedro because he hasn’t pitched in 17 days, but why he used Park in back-to-back games? He was out longer than Pedro and had a setback while rehabbing in Clearwater. That didn’t make sense to me.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:36 AM, 10/17/2009
    Thanks, Dave. I needed some perspective.
    gbrettfan
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:48 AM, 10/17/2009
    Great article Murph, until I got to the sentence, "But sometimes, the other team simple beats you." We really beat ourselves! Park putting the 1st man on, Blake, kills us. Pierre then runs for him and then the unfieldable bunt happens and they have 2 on, no outs. Then the double play ball. Even if Utley turns it, it's two outs, Pierre on third with Thome at bat. Thome promptly singles to tie the game anyway. But the whole complexion could have been changed if we got that DP. I hope Chase is out there today in the rain with Jimmy and Howard practicing DP's!
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:49 AM, 10/17/2009
    nice article, like the "perspective" tie-in. hard loss to take, knowing what we wasted yesterday, but you're right, we took one out there. that's what we needed to do. to the utley hater: back off
    bigsteve
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:19 PM, 10/17/2009
    Dave, I've been reading on the philly.com message boards that Utley may have a chronic hip condition. Any truth to these rumors? Inquiry minds want to know. So do Daily Newsy minds.
    phink
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:15 PM, 10/17/2009
    Ethier hits .302 vs. righties (and has been clutch all year.) He hits .194 against lefties. That's as big a spread as you'll tend to see. Happ was the right pitcher, but like 3 other relievers, he didn't do his job. When 4 players each fail to execute (let alone Utley), it's simply the players' fault... And while I would have kept Pedro in and yanked him after the first hard-hit ball, you're right, David, to say it takes one pitch. We've seen it a thousand times when the starter just loses it all at once. Had that happened, it would have been so easy to second-guess Charlie and point to Pedro's long layoff, his pitch count, his age, the heat, the hard-hit ball by Loney, and a previously sharp Park (as well as the rest of the bullpen) sitting unused... That's why second-guessing is childish: Until you're 5th- and 6th-guessing, you're not truly considering everything. Oh, and if we need Pedro later in the series (it feels very possible), I'm relieved today that he wasn't overextended yesterday... All that said, would those going to the games PLEASE make it very uncomfortable for the dodgers this week!!
    PhilaLogic
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:31 PM, 10/17/2009
    I can't understand anyone ripping Utley. The guy has built up plenty of equity with his heady play and timley hitting that I can accept a couple of bad throws. Chase is a special player get a life.
    studo
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:40 PM, 10/17/2009
    Great post, Dave. Tell the haters to go pass out in a bathroom somewhere
    andwhysee
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:15 PM, 10/17/2009
    It's tough to win a game up 1-0 in the 8th in any circumstances. A lot of little things went wrong in that inning. It's over. Too bad the Phils couldn't have attacked Padilla earlier in the count and given themselves an opportunity to score a few more runs. After he gave up the homer to Howard on that Little League curveball, he wisely (who'd have thought we'd ever credit Padilla's wisdom) went to just 2 pitches. It looked to me like he started almost every batter with a fastball that our batters took for strike 1. The guy matched Pedro pitch for pitch, but I thought the Phils could have made some adjustments once they saw he wasn't going to be out of the strike zone.
    frankenslade


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3
About David Murphy
David Murphy joined the Daily News as its Phillies beat writer in February of 2008. Born in Upper Merion and raised in the Poconos, he attended college at La Salle University before taking jobs with the Myrtle Beach (S.C.) Sun-News and the St. Petersburg ( Fla. ) Times. E-mail Dave at dmurphy@phillynews.com.

Join on Facebook    Follow on Twitter

Get Your Philadelphia Phillies Gear Here
    Latest Phillies Videos