Nittany Lying
He didn't do the honorable thing then, so Joe Paterno must do it now. He must resign immediately.
Nittany Lying
Phil Sheridan, Inquirer Columnist
The other problem with absolute power — after it corrupts absolutely — is that it leaves its wielder with nowhere to transfer blame. That is why Joe Paterno’s cover story in this disgraceful Jerry Sandusky situation just doesn’t hold up.
Paterno is Penn State. He is the king there. The king doesn’t pass the buck up the line because there’s no one up the line to pass it to. If you accept that the 2002 incident described in the grand jury report on Sandusky was the first Paterno ever heard of his longtime assistant’s sex crimes —and that’s an enormous if — it was up to Paterno to take charge and make sure the allegations were reported.
A young graduate assistant comes to the legendary head coach after witnessing another longtime assistant coach doing something that horrific? Sorry. It is not acceptable or even credible that Paterno tossed the matter over to athletic director Tim Curley and let the whole matter slide.
Because he did not do the honorable thing then, the only honorable thing now is for Paterno to resign. Not at the end of the season. Not after going to another bowl game. Not after adding a few more wins to his record career total. Paterno must resign immediately if he or the university he loves have any chance to scrub away this stain.
It was football-as-religion that gave Sandusky the license to behave as he allegedly did. It was football-as-religion that led to what looks like a deliberate coverup by the university, its police and the athletic department. Football-as-religion must not be allowed to govern Paterno’s actions now.
How can he teach his players a game plan for Saturday’s home game against Nebraska? How can he insult everyone, especially the alleged victims here, by insisting on football-only questions at his press conferences? How can he call plays or decide on third-down strategies as if nothing ever happened?
He has been doing that for almost a decade, at least, knowing what he knew. He can’t possibly think it’s acceptable to keep doing it.
From here, it sure looks as if Sandusky’s “retirement” from Penn State was orchestrated after he was accused and investigated of inappropriate contact with a young boy in 1998. It sure looks as if the graduate assistant who reported seeing Sandusky rape a child in a shower in 2002 was rewarded with a permanent staff job for not taking the matter beyond Paterno.
Is that far-fetched? Read the grand jury presentment and tell me anything is more far-fetched than that. If all of these allegations are true — and there are too many witnesses and too many disturbing patterns to dismiss them — then Sandusky felt completely comfortable raping children in the Penn State football facilities. He did almost nothing to conceal his crimes. And let’s not kid ourselves that Sandusky just started doing this suddenly in the 1990s. This is merely what this investigation turned up for this grand jury.
And we’re supposed to believe the man who rules State College like a pharaoh knew nothing? And that when he was told, he figured someone else would handle it, then forgot all about it?
It just doesn’t add up. Paterno’s absolute power allowed him to remain head coach for years longer than anyone expected. He can’t be head coach any more because that same absolute power makes his cover story look ridiculous.
One thing that is obvious from reading the responses. The people defending Joe have NOT read the grand jury report and are NOT familiar with the facts of the case, especially the fact that it involves multiple incidents, many of which occurred while he was still a PSU assistant! banned
@banned:
You are making far too many assumptions. What I'm seeing in most of the comments here and on other sites is that the JoePa haters are actually making stuff up, which leads me to believe that they have not read the grand jury report. Furthermore, the fact that a sizable portion of the venom and wrath has been directed at JoePa as opposed to being directed toward Sandusky, McQueary, Curley, Schultz, Spanier, Second Mile, the parents of the kids, the mother of Victim 6 for letting the issue go, the campus police, the janitor, Sandusky's wife, family, and other friends, and the many others who are also to blame is completely baffling to me. People just want to go after the big name. I'm not saying JoePa is completely blameless but there are very few objective, rational people out there commenting on this story. Most are creating their owns stories and rolling with that. Penfold18
Maybe Joe Pa failed in some way, but can we stop the rush to judgement and wait to hear at least some of the facts. Is this the 1600s in Salem, MA? Seems that way on the internet with social media and writers who can extrapolate limited facts to get a column written to meet a short deadline SeanMcD- Sheesh. The most powerful guy at PSU is suddenly portrayed as a powerless worker bee. When the school bans a guy from bringing boys on campus, but doesn't ban the guy himself or even care what he does elsewhere...that's as low as it goes. Sorry. After seeing this, is there anything Paterno and the PSU crowd find unacceptable?
jtj06
Joe must go. He clearly knew. Per the indictment, the grad assistant came to his house on a Saturday morning in March to report the incident and was very upset. You then do not report such a thing to the A.D. without first getting the full details from the grad assistant, especially when it occurred in your football building. Paterno is lying. CD75
Joe must go.
CD75
Penfold18, read page 7 of the Presentment. Although I'm sure he was told the details of the 2002 incident, JoePa admitted that he was informed of the fondling or the doing of something of a sexual nature to a young in the showers by Sandulsky. It doesn't follow that even hearing this so-called generic accusation of horseplay, that he waited another day (on Sunday) to contact the AD. Guess he needed time to get his story line from his lawyers on how to water down the story before he passed it on so it didn't get the urgent attention required. puzzled2
Oops. Missed the word "boy" in the second sentence which should have read,
Although I'm sure he was told the details of the 2002 incident, JoePa admitted that he was informed of the fondling or the doing of something of a sexual nature to a young boy in the showers by Sandulsky.
puzzled2
Penfold18, yes others are to blame for letting this go as well. However, I don't see them trying to hide behind the claim that they didn't know details and trying to downplay what they were told was "horseplay". I used to be a fan of JoePa before this. Disgusting. puzzled2
JoePa is no different that Monsignor Lynn. Knew about it but passed the buck. So much for his moral obligation to future victims. tmbmtm
Weak cowardly Lions who mewed like blind kittens and went back to feeding at the football ninny. psupoed
Great column especially compared to the swill I've been reading by the Reading Eagle PSU beat writer who admitted he heard the rumors but cound't possibly believe it could happen at PSU. The arrogance of the people who protected the idea of Paterno and PSU can't continue. It's amazing even one post suggests Paterno is clear of this horrendous story. As a PSU alumn living out of state I've been telling my PS friends Joe had to go for 10 years before it ends badly, meaning dying on the field. But this? This is the darkest scandal in the history of college sports. He has appeared lost and arrogant for years but the hardcore PSU fans thought he was the best though the program continued to plunge (25 years since a national championship?). The people who even slightly give Paterno the benefit of the doubt probabally think he's still actually coaching. Paterno has to go today. Makes you long for the days of free tattoos and cars. It will be a long time before I wear my PSU t-shirts. TomO
Sheridan will have a second career when Nancy Grace goes dancing off to the stars. vegasscott
Lets not forget at the time he moved this up the chain Schultz was in charge of the on campus police, he was not the VP of Finance. The 2002 incident was on campus and Campus police were involved. Curly and Schultz informed the 2nd mile in 2002 that the investigation did not turn up anything illegal. With all the assumptions flying around it is a good bet to assume that Joe was informed of the same thing. Joe was not the witness to the event. Nowhere on the message boards is anyone going after McQuery, he was the witness, if he saw what he is claiming to have see why not call police from the building? McQuery, his father, Curly, Schultz, and the director of the 2nd mile all knew of both sets of allogations, yet not one of them called police, yet everyone just wants to go after Joe. How do we know that they did not go back to him and say nothing illegal happened? I dont think his statement of being fooled referred mearly to Sandusky. I see it as him referring to what he was told after the 2002 incident was "investigated". What has happened is horrifying and a complete embarrasment. However, lets not thoss Joe to the fire because he is the big name. He is the football coach, in hindsight he should have called police, but hindsight is 20/20. I am sure he will admit that. He trusted the administration to do there job and they failed him. What you people are doing here is nothing more then head hunting and you just want to chop the biggest head. Bdog14
Comment removed.


