PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
options
 
Monday, January 2, 2012
Dusty Rose, a female pit bull, was rescued by volunteers who found her near a dumpster at a convenience store in Harrisburg on New Year's eve.

Pennsylvania's motto is "State of Independence."

Perhaps it should be "State of Inhumanity."

With animal shelters left and right ending animal control contracts and closing their doors to stray cats and dogs - the very duties most of them were established to perform - the state of animal control in the Commonwealth is horrific.

Nowhere are things worse than the Capital city, Harrisburg.

Sometime last fall, perhaps earlier, the Humane Society of Harrisburg Area, which operates the key animal shelter in the area, stopped performing animal control services for the city of Harrisburg.

Why? The bankrupt city owned the shelter roughly $6,300.

There was no announcement to the public of any alternative plans made by the city and no warning issued to residents that lost pets were in jeopardy of being struck by a car, stolen executed by police or, perhaps worst of all, removed by police and abandoned in the wild.

Curiously however, in a WHP-21 television news report last week, Harrisburg Mayor Linda Thompson said the situation had been resolved.

But reports persist of stray animals being turned away by the shelter and of police telling residents they could do nothing to help them except "take care" of the animal if they deemed it aggressive.

In a Dec. 5 memo obtained by the Inquirer, Harrisburg Police Capt. Annette Books told police supervisors that because the humane society was no longer taking strays officers were to do the following:

If the animal is vicious and a danger to the public and/or officers, or if the animal is obviously sick, injured or suffering the animal may be destroyed in as safe a manner as possible. The animal will then be taken to the Agriculture Bldg. (near the loading dock area) on Cameron St. for disposal.

The memo outraged animal welfare advocates who said the policy was not only inhumane, it was illegal.

"A police officers cannot play judge, jury and executioner in the case of a stray dog," said Tom Hickey, a member of the governor's Dog Law Advisory Board. "The only problem is Pennsylvania law doesn't allow it. They must first hold an animal for 48 hours."

In a Dec. 29 email, Robert Philbin, spokesman for Harrisburg Mayor Linda Thompson, said the memo's instructions were "moot" because the city has started making payments to the shelter to satisfy their debt.

"The Mayor and the CEO of the Humane Society had a cordial and productive meeting two weeks ago to establish a reporting program to identify the source of animals processed and a payment agreement," said Philbin. "The city has begun payments and the society and police department have implemented an identification and reporting system."

A humane society spokeswoman said in an email this morning that talks were under way.

"We are engaged in ongoing discussions with city officials regarding services for stray animals and we feel they are making an effort to make stray animals a priority," said spokeswoman Christina Wiley, who added any questions about services "not provided while the city was not under contract" should be directed to the city.

But the fact remains - according to animal rescuers - that the city shelter continues to turn away stray animals and that police officers are telling the public they cannot help unless the dog is aggressive. In which case, according to the memo, they will be shot.

Dusty Rose could easily have been one of them.

The female pit bull was found in distress outside a mini-mart on busy Cameron Street on New Year's eve - only a few blocks from the Department of Agriculture offices where officers were told to take the bodies of dogs they destroyed.

Pat Wadsworth, a 65-year-old volunteer with Central Pennsylvania Animal Alliance (CPAA), was making her rounds feeding sterilized stray cats that live throughout the city and are cared for as part of the group's Trap, Neuter and Release program.

Wadsworth called 911 after noticing the dog, who was cowering near a dumpster, appeared "out of sorts." When a police officer arrived she said he told her the only thing he was authorized to do was shoot the dog if it was aggressive.

Wadsworth told him she would seek help elsewhere and called fellow CPAA volunteers who helped round up the dog, who went quietly into their car.

Dusty Rose was whisked to an emergency veterinary hospital in York where she is recovering from costly ($1,600-plus) surgery to fix a prolapsed uterus, a life threatening condition not uncommon in heavily-bred dogs.

What if a Harrisburg resident's dog was lost and did not pose a threat? Here's the city's solution to that problem, according to Books' email:

If the animal is determined to be a "found" animal, the officer can ask the complainant if they want to keep the animal or if they know someone who will adopt the animal, or the officer can adopt the animal for himself/herself, or the officer can place the animal in a prisoner van and release it to an area where it will be safe for the animal.

What "safe place?" A park? A forest? An upscale neighborhood in suburbia?

Abandonment of dogs violates the state's animal cruelty law and in addition, releasing domestic animals "into the wild" is against state game laws.

Perhaps the most chilling line in the memo is this:

If you choose to adopt the animal yourself or release it in a safe environment, DO NOT inform the complainant of your intentions.

Maybe the officer could say the animal is going to "a nice farm in the country?"

What we do know is that Harrisburg animal control has been shuttling animals 60 miles away to a shelter in Chambersburg in an attempt to save their lives for months.

Nancy Gardner, president of the board of the Cumberland Valley Animal Shelter and a member of the state's Dog Law Advisory Board, recently informed the state they would no longer take strays from out of county because they cannot afford it and do not have space.

She said her shelter has taken in 80 dogs from Harrisburg and the surrounding area this fall.

Kris Baker, a Harrisburg resident and volunteer with CPAA, said her group, which has no shelter and relies on a network of foster homes, picked up four stray dogs in the city last week.

Is this just a Harrisburg city issue? Is this "just a pit bull" issue?

Not by a long shot. The city's canine residents include Gov. Corbett's own beloved Airedale pups, Penny and Harry. Yes, there is a high wall surrounding the governor's mansion, but there are gates with openings a dog could slip through.

Still the fate of a neglected pit bull - who was overbred and abused through no fault of her own - should be of equal concern to the citizenry - all of whose pets are at risk right now.

Baker has started a Facebook petition drive (http://apps.facebook.com/petitions/4/stop-the-shooting-of-stray-dogs-in-harrisburg-pa/ to "Stop the Shooting of Dogs in Harrisburg" and said she fears for her own animals should they get loose in the city.

"To think that if my home were broken into and my dogs got loose, or I was walking them and something happened to cause me to lose control of my dogs, or a fire and my dogs escaped only to fall into the hands of City Police who would either shoot them and dump them in trash bags behind the Department of Agriculture or dump them in a remote location, sickens me," she wrote in an email.

Funds for Dusty Rose's care can be sent to C.P.A.A. or donations can be taken through its website . Checks should reference Dusty in the memo line to be applied directly to her care.

Posted by Amy Worden @ 12:58 PM  Permalink | 10 comments
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:39 PM, 01/02/2012
    One more reason for spaying and neutering.
    crystalrainbowspirit1
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:37 PM, 01/02/2012
    Great article. I just wanted to add something. One of the CPAA volunteers who saved Dusty Rose was an off-duty Harrisburg police officer. There are officers who do care and are frustrated by the lack of cooperation and planning by the entities who are supposed to be serving the people and animals of the city. The city has a dog licensing program where they collect their own fees, exempt from county licensing. So where is the money going and why has it not gone to fund an animal control facility where strays can be safely taken and not abandoned somewhere or shot? There needs to be a LEGAL AND HUMANE Plan B put into place so these animals do not continue to suffer or die. The animals deserve much better than this.
    cpaamichele
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:39 AM, 01/03/2012
    One would have hoped his time of the Dog Law Advisory Board would have inspired the ever-informed Mr. Hickey to read the dog law. To his utter dismay he would have found that: "Every police officer, State dog warden, employee of the department or animal control officer may humanely kill any dog which is found running at large and is deemed after due consideration by the police officer, State dog warden, employee of the department or animal control officer to constitute a threat to the public health and welfare."

    Of course, the Harrisburg Police would also have found: "It shall be the DUTY (my caps) of every police officer, State dog warden, employee of the department or animal control officer to seize and DETAIN (my caps) any dog which is found running at large, either upon the public streets or highways of the Commonwealth, or upon the property of a person other than the owner of the dog, and unaccompanied by the owner or keeper."

    Both are in the same section of the dog law (PA 459-302). All of this dismay about the situation has the ring of Claude Rains in Casablanca being "shocked" to know learn there is gambling going n at Rick's as he is handed his winnings. Every elected official who has turned a blind eye to the animal control debacle in PA and its negative effects on charities which have to pick up the pieces and the deadly effects on the animals who are killed because of the lack of leadership by officials shares in the responsibility for situations like this across the state. They were elected to lead and solve problems, not bluster and hide.
    Karel Minor, Executive Director, HSBC
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:58 PM, 01/03/2012
    Karl, I typically do not respond to reader's comments made concerning me because I believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But I am going to make an exception just this once because you are so special Karl!

    Rather than a weak and inaccurate character assassination attempt of a person working tirelessly to help sick, defenseless and freezing dogs who are wandering the streets in the city of Harrisburg I would suggest that as an Executive Director of an animal shelter not that far from Harrisburg you use that energy to help the situation. You have the authority to help dogs tonight.

    How many dogs can we count on you to take in Karl?

    Tom Hickey
    Member, PA Dog Law Advisory Board
    Tom H.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:53 PM, 01/04/2012
    I was unaware that printing the letter of a law you "advise" on but which you appear to not have read given your presumably accurate quote of, "A police officers cannot play judge, jury and executioner in the case of a stray dog," said Tom Hickey, a member of the governor's Dog Law Advisory Board. "The only problem is Pennsylvania law doesn't allow it. They must first hold an animal for 48 hours." counted as character assassination. The law most clearly does allow police officers to do so after "due consideration". If the quote is inaccurate, please accept my sincerest apologies.

    As you may know, we transfer in strays from all over SE PA as well as from the BDLE. I'd have to double check but I think we've even transferred them in from Harrisburg. I can't imagine Harrisburg Police will be in the position to drive ninety minutes to bring us strays but if you'd like to assist them, please get in touch. We'd be happy to transfer in animals. You have our contact information, please reach out to us when you bring yourself in from the streets of Harrisburg.
    Karel Minor, Executive Director, HSBC
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:27 PM, 01/04/2012
    I will acknowledge that I was incorrect regarding misstatements about the situation in Lancaster. It appears the situation was reported correctly. However, it does still seem to me that the tone of most of these blogs blames the shelters, who have begged, pleaded, argued, etc. with their local municipalities to properly fund animal control, only to be vilified in public.
    keersf
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:02 PM, 01/05/2012
    And Tom, despite our clear love for one another (isn't our flirty jousting so cute?), I wonder if you'll reciprocate when I express my appreciation for the fact that you sign your name to your posts. Whether we agree with postings or not, it's nice to know who your are agreeing/disagreeing with.

    One a real policy front: The new Delco shelter and pricing structure -which I am pleased to say looks very much like the plan HSBC published a couple years ago and forwarded to Delco officials, not that we need credit or anything;) - is charging a rate of $250 per animal. That's far higher than any shelter rate I'm aware of, yet shelters get hammered for over charging when they ask for half that amount. I actually think this is a fair and realistic rate and would allow for high quality animal control sheltering. What's your thought on this rate and would you get behind the asmount as a good base figure that municipalities should just come to grips with as the real cost? HSBC would create an animal control MSO tomorrow if that was the reimbursement for strays since it would be a fair rate which would allow for high qulaity, humane care. Thoughts? Any chance you'd like to engage in some Lincoln/Douglass in print or person on these issues?
    Karel Minor, Executive Director, HSBC
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:50 PM, 01/05/2012
    For some reason, my original post was not published. I wanted to point out that most shelters, in fact, were not founded to take in the stray and homeless animals. In fact, most humane organizations were founded to rescue animals from abusive situations and prosecute those cases. This role, as far as I know, has not been given up by any of the organizations referenced in this blog. When these organizations were originally founded, there was a government "dog catcher" who handled strays. It was only much later that these organizations took on the role of animal control as a way to increase their funding and, hopefully, do a better job of it than government.

    Now they are giving that government responsibility back to the state/municipalities, and they have that right, since they are private organizations. Animal control is about protecting the public from animals, and therefore, the government needs to FUND this function.

    As Karel mentions, I think any organization in the state would be thrilled to get $250 an animal to do animal control. That would allow the job to be done well and would cover the actual cost. But let us not forget that, in this state, local elected officials only like to talk about the dogs, as if all of the stray/feral cats don't really exist. Maybe the state should adopt some comprehensive plans to implement Trap-Neuter-Return, which is actually successful at addressing the issue of stray and feral cats and would cost far less than $250. Instead, they ignore this segment of homeless animals and allow the problem to grow.

    When is a statewide meeting going to be held to address this crisis in this state?
    keersf
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:58 PM, 01/12/2012
    they should hang these cops along with Michael Vick!
    carmine0528
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:21 PM, 01/12/2012
    Karl, on the rate issue, sit down now, you and I are in complete agreement! The $250 rate I believe is fair and will give the facility the ability to implement the programs needed to properly care for animals. I have always been an advocate for higher fees, supported that with the Delco plan, and, in fact, would support county-wide fees for animal welfare programs at humane societies.

    Tom Hickey
    Member, PA Dog Law Advisory Board
    Tom H.


10 comments
About Amy Worden
Amy Worden is a politics and government reporter for the Inquirer. In that capacity she has explored a range of animal issues from dog kennel law improvements and horse slaughter to the comeback of peregrine falcons and pigeon hunts. From hamsters to horses, animals have always been part of her life. To pass along a tip or contact Amy, click here.