Tuesday, July 28, 2015

PA Congressional delegation gets solid grade on animal votes

Okay, so Pennsylvania's not at the top of the class when it comes to supporting animal issues in the U.S. Congress.

PA Congressional delegation gets solid grade on animal votes

0 comments

Okay, so Pennsylvania's not at the top of the class when it comes to supporting animal issues in the U.S. Congress.

Shout out to Rhode Island where U.S. House lawmakers scored a whopping 100 percent on humane legislation and its two Senators 90 percent.

But neither was the Pennsylvania delegation in the basement.

The Humane Society of the United States' midterm humane scorecard gives Pennsylvania's 19 U.S. House members an average of 51 percent and two Senators 20 on multitude of animal welfare bills.

Humane Society Legislative Fund Michael Markarian said PA "in general, performed well on animal protection issues compared to other states." 

The partisan divide was evident on animal issues. On average Democrats scored 70 to Republicans' 20.

But a leader among Pennsylvania lawmakers is Rep. Jim Gerlach, a Republican, who is the lead sponsor on a bill (HR 835) to crack down on internet puppy sales. The bill closes a loophole in the Animal Welfare Act by requiring that commercial breeders who sell 50 or more puppies per year directly to consumers online or by other means be licensed and inspected, just as breeders who supply to pet stores already must be. It will also requires that breeding dogs at commercial facilities be allowed to exercise daily.

House Rep. Tom Marino, a Republican, is lead sponsor on a bill to crack down on animal fighting spectators and Rep. Mike Doyle, a Democrat, is a leader in the effort to stop theft of pets by so-called "Class B' or random source dealers, for animal research and Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick, a Republican, successfully amended a bill to stop the weakening of the Endangered Species Act.

How did your Representative or Senator vote on bills relating to puppy mills, endangered species, horse slaughter, dog fighting, animal testing or agriculture subsidies?

Check out their records here.

 

 

 

Inquirer Staff Writer
0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Amy Worden Inquirer Staff Writer
Latest Videos:
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter