A House committee on Tuesday approved a measure that would authorize a study examining the economic impacts of the 2008 dog law.
The resolution (HR 89) , approved in a 19-5 vote in the House Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee directs the bipartisan Joint State Government Committee to review the impact "on the regulated commercial dog kennel industry, its business service sectors and the Commonwealth and the estimated impacts of the implementation of the regulatory standards which take effect on July 1, 2011."
Lead sponsor Rep. Gordon Denlinger (R., Lancaster) told the committee his intent was not to reopen the dog law - which established more humane standards for care of dogs in commercial breeding facilities - but to provide information on whether it has reduced state revenue or cost jobs.
"This does not represent an attempt to change the law," he said Tuesday.
However, the resolution clearly states otherwise, directing the commission to consider:
The feasibility of implementing the commercial kennel canine health regulatory standards on July 1, 2011.
(2) The scope of amendments to the Dog Law which might be desirable refinements to address the problems identified by the certifying entities.
(3) The scope of amendments to the commercial kennel canine health regulatory standards adopted under the act of October 9, 2008 (P.L.1450, No.119), which might be desirable refinements to address the problems identified by the certifying entities.
A spokesman for House Majority leader Mike Turzai (R., Allegheny) said there was no immediate plan to bring the bill to the floor for final passage.
When asked by committee members, Denlinger was unable to provide data to support the resolution's claims that "millions" in state sales and income tax dollars is being lost and that veterinarians are suffering business losses as a result.
In fact, it was not until a 2010 agreement with the Department of Revenue that commercial dog breeders had to prove they collect sales tax before being issued a kennel license. At the time a breeder representative sought amnesty for kennel operators which indicates many were not paying sales tax to begin with despite the fact that dogs sales are a taxable under the law
Tom Hickey, a member of the Dog Law Advisory Board, condemned the measure "mischief by a few members" and the study a "waste of taxpayer money."
"The hundreds of thousands who spoke out three years ago in the state will not allow this behavior," said Hickey, who helped draft the dog law. "They should take a lighter and burn this resolution."
The number of commercial kennels - those which sell more than 60 dogs a year or sell a single dog to a pet store - in Pennsylvania once totaling roughly 300, has dropped to just over 100 since the dog law was signed by Gov. Rendell. But about 70 of those that dropped their commercial license remain open under a smaller class of license.
Are we going to try to abandon the dog laws because of lost jobs? Would you abandon child labor laws because it cost employers revenue? crystalrainbowspirit1
When the law was passed Ed's puppet democrat's were in control. Now the Republicans are in control so reap the wind. The point is we the people sit in the middle with our animals and suffer. Some reforms were good and needed, most were Bob Baker's radical bull meant to put all breeders in Pa out of business and expand the bloated profits of the rescues / shelters. All breeders in Pa have suffered due to the economy and all this bad press; if you really wanted to help the dogs you would work with the owners of dogs in a partnership not ram regulations down their throats like a Hitler Blitzkrieg. Stick your heads in the sand and say it's all about the dogs you greedy HSUS sows, I hope we see reform that exposes you for the crooks you are and then we can find people that will work together to help the canines of the world without politics. Lets Be Real
Since 96.6% of the House and Senate voted for the final bill, perhaps we must declare the entire Republican Party "Rendell's puppets", too. But that hardly seems the case. The fact is, support for commercial breeding reform had more to do with who was beholden to the Ag lobby more than the party they belonged to. Without the overwhelming suport of Republicans, Rendell couldn't have signed this law. If they were terrorized into voting for it by puppy hugging voters, it would seem that puppy huggers have learned a lesson from the Tea Party in legislative effectiveness. With the stunning backpeddling on HR 89, it appears to be a lesson that has not been forgotten. Karel Minor, Executive Director, HSBC
- ohmidog!
- Animals & Politics
- A Humane Nation
- Pet-Abuse.com
- North Penn Puppy Mill Watch
- Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
- Best Friends Animal Society
- zootoo
- Animal Legal Defense Fund
- Paw Print Post
- The Bark
- WebMed/Pets
- PetMD
- Vetstreet
- Pet Watch New Jersey
- Dogster
- Animal Law Coalition
- Catster
- Terrierman
- Pets
- Share your pet photos
- Animal Watch
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009







