PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
comments
9
options
 
Monday, June 29, 2009

A Department of Agriculture official tells me that the ten days granted to kennel owner Derbe Eckhart to disperse his dogs after his license was refused and his appeals exhausted, had in fact, expired at the time of the raid. In normal circumstances where the lives of the dogs were not at risk, the official said, they would give the kennel owner a "few days" grace time to remove their dogs.

The 216 dogs seized from a Lehigh County kennel were barely settled in at the Farm Show area in Harrisburg last week when naysayers from dog breeding circles started blasting the raid in Internet chat rooms, questioning its legality and whether dogs were truly "abused." One member of a forum hosted by the Pennsylvania Federation of Dog Clubs asked: "What kind of protection do any of us have from a trumped up search and seizure?"

Here are the facts about the raid: The state Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement, with the help of the Humane Society of the United States, entered Almost Heaven kennel in Emmaus last Tuesday after owner Derbe Eckhart's license revocation appeal process had been exhausted. Under the new dog law, a kennel owner in similar circumstances would have 10 days to disperse their dogs, but Jessie Smith, special deputy secretary for Dog Law Enforcement, said the bureau moved swiftly without notice because Eckhart had threatened a dog warden that he would kill his dogs before anyone took them away.

Smith said the department asked for the help of HSUS because it had the resources - most importantly a climate-controlled tractor trailer - needed to remove a large number of dogs safely. Smith said ownership of the dogs was transferred to HSUS - which dispersed them to Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C.-area shelters - and under dog law does not need to have a Pennsylvania kennel license. The law states the dogs may be transferred to an entity "approved by the department."

On the question of "trumped up charges," it seemed like a good time to review Eckhart's long record of run-ins with the law, including a stint in prison - the only jail sentence I have heard imposed on someone for having unsanitary kennel conditions. In fact, I am unaware of any prison sentence imposed on someone convicted of animal abuse in Pennsylvania, although animal rights activists remind me that people have gone to jail for trying to protect animals (activists were jailed - some for as long as two weeks - for protesting at the now-defunct Hegins pigeon shoot in the early 1990s).

Here's a look at Eckhart's criminal chronology as compiled by the website www.pet-abuse.com, based in large part on seven years of reporting by Bill White of the Morning Call of Allentown:

Feb 6, 2009 - Emmaus, PA (US)
Alleged: Operating boarding kennel after license refusal

Oct 1, 2008 - Emmaus, PA (US)
Alleged: Puppy mill - 800 animals, 125 seized

Jul 19, 2006 - Emmaus, PA (US)
Not Charged: Housing exotic animals

Aug 2004 - Emmaus, PA (US)
Civil Case: Dog breeders given lifetime ban by American Kennel Club

Notes: Lifetime ban from AKC

Apr 1999 - Allentown, PA (US)
Not Charged: AKC suspended breeder using alias to register dogs

Jun 1991 - Allentown, PA (US)
Convicted: Convicted abuser operating unlicensed kennels

May 1991 - Weissport, PA (US)
Convicted: Convicted abuser operating unlicensed kennel

Apr 1990 - Lehighton, PA (US)
Convicted: 10 puppies die from lack of sustenance

Jun 1989 - Allentown, PA (US)
Convicted: Convicted abuser suspended from AKC until 2019

Aug 1988 - Lehighton, PA (US)
Convicted: 45 dogs, 3 cats starved, removed from home

Sentence: Fined $100 each for 32 citations for cruelty to animals; sentenced to 2 to 10 months in Carbon County Prison for allowing unsanitary conditions at the kennel.

At the time his application for a new license was refused in January, Eckhart had repeatedly violated the terms of his license revocation issued following a raid by the Pennsylvania SPCA in October 2008. Eckhart also was operating under a 2004 consent agreement with the Attorney General issued after the state determined he had violated consumer protection law for failing to provide health certificates signed by a veterinarian and failing to provide a guarantee of good health. The Attorney General's office said in February that it had received 20 complaints since 2004.

A Morning Call investigation last year that tested the DNA of several dogs sold by Eckhart concluded that he had misrepresented the breeds sold to unsuspecting customers.

Rescue groups, which have taken in hundreds of sick and injured dogs voluntarily surrendered by Eckhart over the last five years, say most suffered from health problems or injuries, including dogs with broken backs and a poodle who had to have a chain removed from its stomach.

Eckhart is among the top tax delinquents in the state. According to the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, he owes more than $80,000 in back taxes.

Eckhart also faces a raft of new charges for violations to the terms of the license revocation process which required him to downsize the kennel and not breed or expand the number dogs on the property. In an inspection earlier this year, dog wardens found dozens of new dogs on site and additional dogs being boarded at the kennel. Main Line Animal Rescue of Chester Springs, which took in 17 dogs from the raid, said at least two are pregnant.

Eckhart today will be charged with 22 new counts of animal cruelty, the result of a raid conducted by the Pennsylvania SPCA last Wednesday, a spokeswoman for the organization said. Based on information provided by dog wardens and HSUS staff the day before, the PSPCA removed 18 exotic cats (including Himalayans and Persians) and four more dogs with serious health problems. Under state law Eckhart may own up to 25 dogs without a license. He also has horses, birds, guinea pigs and monkeys on the property.
 

Posted by Amy Worden @ 11:28 AM  Permalink | 9 comments
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:43 PM, 06/29/2009
    It is interesting to note that Amy Worden quotes from a single post to the PFDC list, but does not mention any of the posts that responded noting many of the things she said in her blog. While I know that the journalistic standard for blogs is not the same as for news articles, it would be nice to see some balanced comments on this issue. The facts from the removal (it wasn't a raid, Amy, as you correctly note in the blog) were accurately posted to the list. Also posted were the reasons for the speedy removal, the reason HSUS was used to remove the dogs and the the section of the dog law that permitted transfer of the the dogs to HSUS. While you mentioned one member's post, the implication of wider spread condemnation of the removal is clear, despite accurate reporting of the situation on the forum. The implication that dog breeders support inhumane treatment of dogs is insulting and inappropriate. Come on Amy, fair is fair and accuracy is important in reporting.
    Julian Prager
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:51 PM, 06/29/2009
    Julian Prager says "The implication that dog breeders support inhumane treatment of dogs is insulting and inappropriate." Some of you breeders never, ever support humane legislation that would greatly improve the welfare of dogs in this state – you’re too worried about how it would look to your peers, some of whom DO abuse dogs! Nor do you EVER speak out against the injustices until push comes to shove, like when well-respected journalists who’ve been researching these sub-standard hellholes for decades accurately report the findings! Unless YOUR precious breeds were discovered suffering in kennels that are the subject of raids and closures by the state, you would remain silent. By remaining silent, you share the guilt of the abusers and, conversely, by criticizing the very humane societies and agencies that rescue these dogs, the implication is indeed that you support the inhumane treatment of dogs!
    Macy
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:22 PM, 06/29/2009
    Julian - not only are you insulting those of us who are for the humane treatment of animals you are also insulting bloggers. I would tread extremely carefully if I were you on that subject. Bloggers get the word out about events, good and bad that need attention, like this situation. Breeders should be held to the highest standards and not be afraid to let any one inspect their dogs or where the dogs reside at anytime. If a breeder is cutting corners and potentially putting their animals in danger they should face the consequences, not only because it's the law but because you have to be a sociopath to do what poor breeders do. I don't think I want that type of person near any living creature. If you want the rest of us to respect what you do, respect your animals and follow the rules.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:49 AM, 06/30/2009
    It is interesting to remember that it was Julian Prager who made the comment about Skip Eckhart not being "compensated" by the Humane Society for the dogs they rescued from the hellish Almost Heaven. Not compensated??? Skip Eckhart should compensate all the rescue organizations that are now vetting, grooming, housing, and rehoming his abused animals. And while the rescues are helping Skip's dogs, many of whom are debarked with badly cropped ears and docked tails, Mr. Prager is valiantly fighting for the right of breeders to continue butchering their poor dogs without the interferance of say - a licensed vet. As far as Amy Worden's writing - I thought this kind of expression and freedom was covered by the Constitution, Mr. Pragar. Aren't you a self-proclaimed expert on the Constitution??? Your dogma stinks like an Eckhart Doodle. But the Doodle can be bathed and shaved down. No amount of scrubbing will erase the shame the hobbyist breeders share by siding with an animal abuser like Skip Eckhart.
    RE-Joyce
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:51 AM, 06/30/2009
    And I understand that Buck County SPCA's own Annie Irwin has been very supportive of the Monster Eckhart.
    RE-Joyce
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:18 PM, 06/30/2009
    Interesting to know that Annie Irwin supports Eckhart. Can you elaborate Re-Joyce? I think the people have a right to know how she has "supported" this monster...
    TPepper
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:09 PM, 06/30/2009
    Anne Irwin has long been seen rubbing elbows with puppy millers (especially those of the bearded and straw-hatted persuasion) at Dog Law Advisory Board Meetings, and also the lobbyist of the PA "Professional" Dog Breeders Association, Kenny Brandt, so this hardly comes as a surprise. And speaking of Eckhart and his breeder-supporters, it was confirmed by Skip himself a few months ago that Linda Witkowski, now an AKC judge and breeder of Min Pins, is not only friends of Skip’s but used to live with him! He said she moved to SC but it looks like she never told the junk-registry ACA to remove her name and address, which is the same as Almost Heaven’s, from the website, under KERI LYNNS MINPINS. Funny thing, even the phone number for the two is the same! Talk about strange bedfellows!!!
    Macy
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:22 PM, 06/30/2009
    Sorry for the typo, the correct spelling is Linda WITOUSKI. It says on the Total Min Pin website that Linda D. Witouski is an AKC judge and Legislation Liaison for PA and SC.
    Macy
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:02 PM, 06/30/2009
    How interesting that Linda Witouski's name appears here - she's the author of the A&N Research Giving You the Facts Blog - found at givinuthefacts dot blogspot dot com and a quick read will quickly let you know which side of the fence she sits on. When Linda's blog first came out everyone thought the initials were for Anne & Nina (as in Anne Irwin and Nina Schaefer (former PA Fed of Dog Clubs President)). Connect the dots, folks, and you'll find it easy to identify those who expoit dogs for profit. It's no surprise that Skippy's a member of this club and in fine company with Anne and Julian.
    LilV


9 comments
About Amy Worden
Amy Worden is a politics and government reporter for the Inquirer. In that capacity she has explored a range of animal issues from dog kennel law improvements and horse slaughter to the comeback of peregrine falcons and pigeon hunts. From hamsters to horses, animals have always been part of her life. To pass along a tip or contact Amy, click here.