Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Casino opponents to get radical?

My pal Isaiah Thompson of City Paper makes the point today that while the anti-casino movement in Philadelphia has lost every battle it has fought, it's also, to some extent, winning the war: There are still zero casinos in the city of Philadelphia. And as construction on Sugarhouse looms closer and closer, Casino-Free is gearing up to keep things that way:

Casino opponents to get radical?

0 comments
Travel Deals

My pal Isaiah Thompson of City Paper makes the point today that while the anti-casino movement in Philadelphia has lost every battle it has fought, it's also, to some extent, winning the war: There are still zero casinos in the city of Philadelphia. And as construction on Sugarhouse looms closer and closer, Casino-Free is gearing up to keep things that way:

Casino-Free will begin a new phase in its opposition to casinos next week, when it launches a new campaign of "direct action" — or civil disobedience — on the SugarHouse construction site. Nearly a hundred members have signed a petition pledging their willingness to take "nonviolent direct action" against the casinos. In a recent interview on Radio Times, Casino-Free attorney Paul Boni affirmed that the group would lie in front of bulldozers if it comes down to it.

This fight has implications for the city, of course, but also for the City -- the government. Last year's five-year plan projected some $82 million in casino-related revenues. That's not chump change. Now, casino opponents (and PICA) argue that revenues like that would be offset by various social costs (like residents going broke). So to some extent, these funds were already in question. But it's worth pointing out that, along with the future of the economy and employee benefit costs, the costs/benefits/existence of casinos in Philadelphia remains uncertain. And, whether they're right or wrong, people lying down in front of bulldozers rarely does anything to improve the certainty of a situation.

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Every year, city government spends slightly more than $4 billion. Where does all that money come from? More importantly, where does it go? Are we getting the most bang for our tax buck? “It's Our Money” is a joint project between Philadelphia Daily News and WHYY, funded by the William Penn Foundation, designed to answer these questions.

It's Our Money contributors

Tips? Comments? Questions?
Contact:

Holly Otterbein:
215-854-5809
hm.otterbein@gmail.com
@hollyotterbein

It's Our Money
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter