PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
options
 
Monday, December 19, 2011

Via John Micek, Capitolwire reports on U.S. Rep. Bob Brady’s efforts to get the state’s current congressional redistricting plan passed. The report says Brady got State Sen. Tina Tartaglione to cast a key vote to get the new map out of committee, and that the congressman is now trying to drum up support for the plan among Philly’s state House delegation.

Brady is doing this, Capitolwire says, in spite of the fact that the congressional redistricting plan “masses the largest number of urban Democratic voters into the smallest number of districts.”

Why would Brady do such a thing? Isn’t he Mr. Democrat? Maybe, but the proposed map isn’t nearly as bad for Brady as it is for Democrats generally: “it let(s) him shoot up the Delaware River to capture more white Democrats, giving him some protection against future black primary challengers.”

When redistricting gets political, it’s usually cast as a partisan issue – Democrats vs. Republicans. But it can also pit powerful incumbents against newcomers, with the majority party and minority incumbents teaming up to protect the status quo.

Basically, redistricting presents many temptations for lawmakers do something other than draw maps that make sense.

Back when the city was doing Council redistricting, we wrote about ways to protect the redistricting process from these temptations:

There are other ways to redistrict. San Francisco uses a task force appointed by various authorities. It holds public meetings and changes drafts based on feedback. More than a dozen states have moved toward a nonpartisan redistricting commission. No commission is a cure-all. But the conflict of interest for Council is too great to leave redistricting in its hands alone.

Same goes for the state. Slate’s Will Oremus finds that redistricting commissions have been running up against some trouble – essentially, partisans complaining about their results – but that they do produce better maps.

Follow us on Twitter and review city services on our sister site, City Howl.

Posted by Doron Taussig @ 3:45 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
Comments   


0 comments
About It's Our Money
Every year, city government spends slightly more than $4 billion. Where does all that money come from? More importantly, where does it go? Are we getting the most bang for our tax buck? “It's Our Money” is a joint project between Philadelphia Daily News and WHYY, funded by the William Penn Foundation, designed to answer these questions.





PHILADELPHIA HORROR STORY

City Hall

When Mayor Nutter introduced his budget he acknowledged several “major financial challenges” facing the city. We prefer to think of them as lurking monsters: The Pension Blob, The property-tax zombie, The School Distric Vampire, Asset sale ghosts, and Council's Bigfoot budget.



PILE OF BOTTLES FILLED WITH URINE

City Howl

The water bottles lying in a pile on Buttonwood Street were not filled with water. Their contents were a mysterious, yellow liquid - one closer to brown, the others the color of lemonade.



WILL CITY COVER $41 MILLION IN STATE CUTS?

podcast

On this week's It's Our Money podcast, Doron Taussig and Holly Otterbein discuss how a budget is a statement of priorities — and also how a mayor needs to be careful what he promises to pay for.


It's Our Money contributors

Tips? Comments? Questions?
Contact:

Doron Taussig:
215-854-5307
doron.taussig@gmail.com
@dorontaussig

Holly Otterbein:
215-854-5809
hm.otterbein@gmail.com
@hollyotterbein

Juliana Reyes:
215-854-5855
juliana.f.reyes@gmail.com
@juliana_f_reyes

Follow on Twitter