Thursday, November 26, 2015

When is the police arbitration decision coming?

There’s a strange notice on the Fraternal Order of Police’s website. It says:

When is the police arbitration decision coming?


There’s a strange notice on the Fraternal Order of Police’s website. It says:

Rumors are running rampant. The truth is the rumors are not correct. We are still in Executive Sessions and there is no contract as of yet. You'll know when we know. Please don’t believe the rumors.

This got us wondering about the police arbitration decision. As Ben wrote back in October, the decision matters not just because there’s a lot of money involved, but because it may set the tone for the city’s other union negotiations.

Neither firefighters nor police are permitted to strike under state law. Instead, union contracts are negotiated through a binding arbitration process. A three member panel – one appointed by the union, one by the city, and one, a mutually agreed-upon third party -- decides on the details of a contract.

We’ve been expecting a decision for a while now. By early November, arbitration hearings were complete, and the Inquirer said a decision was expected late last month or early this month.

Neither the city nor the union was willing to comment on when to expect a decision or the reasons behind the continued delays. (Nor is this the only delay the city has to worry about: Dave Davies reports today that the other unions are far off, too).

A source familiar with the arbitration process confirmed that a delay of this length is unusual.

Though the source attributed some of the problem to the city’s long budget process — Harrisburg didn’t approve crucial portions of the city budget until September — the source also said that the great distance between the parties was making it difficult to find a solution.

Mayor Nutter is demanding serious cuts across the board: no wage increases, changing the health care plan and a switch from a defined-benefit pension plan to a defined-contribution plan for new hires.

The union isn’t willing to concede on all of these points at once, creating a challenging impasse.

The arbiters could conceivably hand down a contract if the city and police don’t agree, but our source said that the neutral arbiter first tries to first get the parties to reach a compromise.

That’s just not happening so far.

Review city services on our sister site, City Howl.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Every year, city government spends slightly more than $4 billion. Where does all that money come from? More importantly, where does it go? Are we getting the most bang for our tax buck? “It's Our Money” is a joint project between Philadelphia Daily News and WHYY, funded by the William Penn Foundation, designed to answer these questions.

It's Our Money contributors

Tips? Comments? Questions?

Holly Otterbein:

It's Our Money
Also on
letter icon Newsletter