Monday, November 30, 2015

Unemployment fraud in PA

The PA Independent reports that Pennsylvania overpaid $374 million in unemployment compensation in 2009:

Unemployment fraud in PA


The PA Independent reports that Pennsylvania overpaid $374 million in unemployment compensation in 2009:

In 2009, Pennsylvania paid out more in unemployment benefits than all but two other states and had one of the ten highest unemployment insurance fraud rates in the nation, according to statistics released by the federal Department of Labor this month.


The federal Labor Department classified 61 percent of all fraudulent payments in Pennsylvania during 2009 as being due to "separation issues," when a recipient of unemployment compensation is working and being paid but fails to report their income in order to continue to receive unemployment. Another 30 percent of fraudulent payments were due to inaccurate reporting of income during the year before the individual became unemployed, which establishes the individual's benefit level.

To point out the obvious: Fraud is bad. Though when thinking about preventing fraud, one does have to consider the cost. This passage from Matthew Yglesias is helpful:

It’s obvious to everyone in a private sector context that the costs of fraud-prevention sometimes exceed the costs of fraud. At CAP, for example, there’s no system in place to prevent people from using the office printer for personal activities. Similarly, you can just walz into the copy room and poach some envelops. And, indeed, fraud and abuse of this sort do take place. But while it wouldn’t be beyond the intellectual capacity of CAP’s senior leadership to design a system to prevent this, preventing the fraud and abuse wouldn’t actually be worthwhile. If you try to do 100 projects well and quickly, you might find out that only 90 of them actually get done well. That might be ten instances of waste. But if the alternative is to avoid all the waste but only get 70 projects done at medium speed, that might be worse.

Of course, in this case, the fact that PA does a worse job at this than most other states does suggest that it could do a better job of fraud prevention here without going overboard.

Follow us on Twitter and review city services on our sister site, City Howl.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Every year, city government spends slightly more than $4 billion. Where does all that money come from? More importantly, where does it go? Are we getting the most bang for our tax buck? “It's Our Money” is a joint project between Philadelphia Daily News and WHYY, funded by the William Penn Foundation, designed to answer these questions.

It's Our Money contributors

Tips? Comments? Questions?

Holly Otterbein:

It's Our Money
Also on
letter icon Newsletter