Reducing size of state legislature: Fine. Other Harrisburg reforms: Better.

A bill to shrink the size of the state legislature passed out of a state House committee yesterday -- a noteworthy development in that it signals some willingness by some in Harrisburg to reconsider the entrenched norms of our oversized, over-priced legislature does business (unless, as Eric Epstein of Rock the Capitol suggested to the Inquirer, it's just political theater). This is particularly welcome in light of the fact that there's broad public support for this type of reform.

We have no big problem with a modest reduction in the number of elected officials in Pennsylvania. This bill would take us from 253 to 203, and according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, Pa. ranks 6th among states in population size but second in legislature size. But there is some democratic downside to increasing the number of constituents each elected official represents, and there's less downside to some other reforms needed in Harrisburg, such as ending taxpayer-funded partisan political caucuses and introducing campaign finance limits. How about those?

Follow us on Twitter and review city services on our sister site, City Howl.