Thursday, September 3, 2015

PICA approves 5-year plan; should it be given different powers?

As Catherine Lucey reports, PICA approved the city's five-year plan today, though it noted concerns about the city's pension system and the fact that the city assumes $60 million in savings on labor costs. Here's PICA's staff report on the city plan.

PICA approves 5-year plan; should it be given different powers?

0 comments
Katz
Katz

As Catherine Lucey reports, PICA approved the city's five-year plan today, though it noted concerns about the city's pension system and the fact that the city assumes $60 million in savings on labor costs. Here's PICA's staff report on the city plan.

In a conversation with reporters afterward, PICA chair Sam Katz said that though there are risks in the plan, "the math works" and none of the risks rise to a level that necessitates voting against the plan

He also raised a point we found interesting, about the very limited arsenal PICA can choose from to get the city to correct problems. It can use its "nuclear power" and nix the city's plan, which results in the withholding of state funds for services that go largely to poor people -- "we get to punish the political class by punishing the poorest people in the city," Katz said. Or ... it can use its bully pulpit, and try to get the city to make a correction by calling it out in the press.

That's not quite all or nothing, but it's close.

Katz said he's interested in looking into changing the nature of PICA's power so it would have some options in-between "talking" and "going nuclear." But he said it would be inappropriate to speculate at this stage as to what a good in-between power would be.

We're happy to hear your ideas in comments: Should PICA be given additional "sticks"? And what shoud they be?

Follow us on Twitter and review city services on our sister site, City Howl.

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Every year, city government spends slightly more than $4 billion. Where does all that money come from? More importantly, where does it go? Are we getting the most bang for our tax buck? “It's Our Money” is a joint project between Philadelphia Daily News and WHYY, funded by the William Penn Foundation, designed to answer these questions.

It's Our Money contributors

Tips? Comments? Questions?
Contact:

Holly Otterbein:
215-854-5809
hm.otterbein@gmail.com
@hollyotterbein

It's Our Money
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter