Today, an bill was introduced in City Council that would radically change the structure of the pension benefit for city employees. Sponsored by Councilman Darrell Clark on behalf of the Nutter Administration, the proposal would replace the current system with a hybrid of a defined benefit plan and a 401(k). Any employee hired after July 1st would be enrolled in the new program.
City Finance Director Rob Dubow says the change could save $500 million over the next thirty years. That might be true, but I can't help but wonder at the timing of this proposal. In some ways, it reminds me of Nutter's call to eliminate DROP and cars for elected officials at the outset of the city budget process. How so? Let's count the ways.
First of all, it's a controversial proposal that's being made at a critical moment. Nutter tried to get Council to kill DROP and cars at the start of the budget process. Now, he is publicly signaling a desire to change the pension benefit for city workers just as contract talks are heating up. Like the cars and DROP proposal, it's likely to anger union leadership.
Another similarity is the lack of control that Nutter has over the issue. In order to get these changes, he'll need to convince the unions to go along. For uniformed workers, that'll have to happen during arbitration hearings. Non-uniformed workers will have to agree at the bargaining table. I can't imagine any of the unions going along with these changes and Nutter has no real incentive to make them go along.
Union leaders told the Daily News that they were given no advance warning about the proposed change. That sounds like the same blues sung by members of City Council, who were shocked to be called out during the Mayor's budget address.
There is one critical difference between changing the pension plan and eliminating DROP and cars for elected officials. If city officials are correct, altering the pension plan could save the city a lot of money in the long run. On the other hand, getting rid of perks for City Council is almost entirely symbolic.
I can't help but wonder what the administration is thinking. This at the very moment that millions of American's retirement hopes are getting slammed by failed 401ks. It says a lot about the Nutter administration's ideological commitments. If anything, its a time to strengthen pensions and move away from 401ks.— Flyingcamel- Nutter doesn't "need to convince the unions to go along." Unions don't need to vote on this proposal, Council does. There's no law that says the unions have to have a contract. They don't. They can choose to work or not work without one. IF the city won't approve a contract, then it actually gives the city more flexibility to hire nonunion employees.— CleanupPhilly
- It's just fundamentally incorrect that "non-uniformed workers will have to agree at the bargaining table" or that "he'll need to convince the unions to go along." The papers have to accept what labor law really says. Start with Reagan versus the Air Traffic Controllers.— CleanupPhilly
- "...most state and federal laws start from the presumption that workers who are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement or an individual employment agreement are "at will" employees who can be fired without notice and for no stated reason..." from the Wiki entry under "United States Labor Law." So it seems that the conventional wisdom that on collective bargaining agreement = at will firing/layoffs/furloughs. This simply is what the city has to do. You're right about DROP and cars, the contracts are the a budget make or break.— CleanupPhilly
- For this reason, it strikes me that the city non-uniformed employees need their collective bargaining agreements a lot, and the city needs to NOT let them enter one. That's how I call this strategy set up. The city no way is going to sign off on a contract, and the worse the unions act, the more cause they'll have to find at-will reasons to terminate, like budget constraints.— CleanupPhilly
- This not only affects city employees, it affects journalists, so I expect to see a more informed outline of PA labor law and the concept of at-will employment and what it means. You have to do this for yourselves as well, so do it generally. Start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At-will_employment— CleanupPhilly
- Flyingcamel, this administration is thinking that it has to cut at least $614 million dollars for the property tax and sales tax hikes it didn't get. That means that we can't afford to have the same number of city employees we had since the original Rizzo. You can't fire them at-will while they have a contract. Nutter doesn't need the nonuniformed city employee vote because he has a more broad appeal. The unions and the journalists have to start to be honest about the law -- it's on Nutter's side if he wants to furlough, layoff, or terminate large swaths of noncritical employees.— CleanupPhilly
MONEY AND JUSTICE DON'T MIX
WILL THE NEW COUNCIL GIVE YOU A SAY?
Tips? Comments? Questions?
Contact:
Doron Taussig:
215-854-5307
doron.taussig@gmail.com
@dorontaussig
Holly Otterbein:
215-854-5809
hm.otterbein@gmail.com
@hollyotterbein
Juliana Reyes:
215-854-5855
juliana.f.reyes@gmail.com
@juliana_f_reyes
 | Follow on Twitter |
- Philly Clout
- Metropolis
- Attytood
- Heard in the Hall
- Commonwealth Confidential
- Philebrity
- Phawker
- Young Philly Politics
- OurPhiladelphia
- Capitol Ideas
- Grassroots PA
- PA Policy Blog
- Media Mobilizing Project
- The Notebook
- Dave Davies Off Mic
- Committee of Seventy
- The Independent
- Naked City
- Plan Philly
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- News | Sports | Business | What's Happening | Restaurants & Food | Entertainment | Living | Marketplace | Jobs
