Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Is the Sheriff what's wrong with tax collection?

To continue with our moderately obsessive coverage of the future of the Sheriff's Office, we thought we'd highlight this op-ed from the Inquirer today, by John Kromer, who is running for Sheriff on the platform that the office should be abolished (this seems a bit strange at first blush -- is the Sheriff the right person to eliminate the position of Sheriff? Kromer explains that his role would be to work with other entities in the system to transition to a world without a Sheriff). Anyway, here's Kromer's case in today's piece:

Is the Sheriff what's wrong with tax collection?

0 comments

To continue with our moderately obsessive coverage of the future of the Sheriff's Office, we thought we'd highlight this op-ed from the Inquirer today, by John Kromer, who is running for Sheriff on the platform that the office should be abolished (this seems a bit strange at first blush -- is the Sheriff the right person to eliminate the position of Sheriff? Kromer explains that his role would be to work with other entities in the system to transition to a world without a Sheriff). Anyway, here's Kromer's case in today's piece:

Four public agencies play key roles in Philadelphia tax collections: the Licenses and Inspections, Law, and Revenue Departments, and the Sheriff's Office, which administers auctions of tax-delinquent properties. L&I's performance has improved greatly under the Nutter administration, and the Law and Revenue Departments have performed reliably and consistently. The Sheriff's Office is the weak link.

The office does not have the capability to scale up the number of tax-delinquent properties brought to auction, and it can't transfer clear title to auctioned properties in a timely, reliable manner. Philadelphia's tax-collection process therefore has little credibility, and irresponsible investors and developers are quick to take advantage of it.

He goes on to argue that the Office won't do better as long as it's headed by a politician accountable essentially to no one.

Follow us on Twitter and review city services on our sister site, City Howl.

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Every year, city government spends slightly more than $4 billion. Where does all that money come from? More importantly, where does it go? Are we getting the most bang for our tax buck? “It's Our Money” is a joint project between Philadelphia Daily News and WHYY, funded by the William Penn Foundation, designed to answer these questions.

It's Our Money contributors

Tips? Comments? Questions?
Contact:

Holly Otterbein:
215-854-5809
hm.otterbein@gmail.com
@hollyotterbein

It's Our Money
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter