Thursday, November 26, 2015

Is leaf collection a service for the wealthy?

As we noted this morning, Council is pushing back against ... well, against itself, on its decision to cut mechanical leaf collection and save $400,000.

Is leaf collection a service for the wealthy?


As we noted this morning, Council is pushing back against ... well, against itself, on its decision to cut mechanical leaf collection and save $400,000.

Isaiah Thompson at City Paper observes that before it was cut, this was a service that was enjoyed by just 10 percent of the city. Which 10 percent, you ask? Isaiah got a map from the streets department. It looks like the neighborhoods that received mechanical leaf collection included Chestnut Hill, West Mt. Airy and the gentrified triangle of West Philly, as well as Somerton and Bustleton in the northeast and a tiny pocket of South Philly.

Says Isaiah:

Asked why these areas - and not others - received service, Streets spokeswoman June Cantor pointed out that they have more leaves. And we don't doubt she's right: but they're also wealthier – a lot wealthier, in some cases – than the rest of the city.

Having more leaves is a pretty good reason to get priority treatment in leaf collection. But the question, given this limited scope, becomes whether this is a service worth preserving. Jeff Shields quotes Councilman Rizzo saying uncollected leaves are "a hazard, choking sewers and causing flooding, or forming dry piles that a hot car muffler can ignite ... We're either going to have to pay now or pay later."

Shields also reports that, yesterday in Council, Bill Green proposed the legislative body find the $400,000 to cut elsewhere, to offset the cost of restoring the service (Council passed a resolution urging Nutter to restore the service). He received no substantive response.

Review city services on our sister site, City Howl.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Every year, city government spends slightly more than $4 billion. Where does all that money come from? More importantly, where does it go? Are we getting the most bang for our tax buck? “It's Our Money” is a joint project between Philadelphia Daily News and WHYY, funded by the William Penn Foundation, designed to answer these questions.

It's Our Money contributors

Tips? Comments? Questions?

Holly Otterbein:

It's Our Money
Also on
letter icon Newsletter