The Inquirer has the story. Short version: the OIG says that it saved the city $4.2 million dollars in salaries, pension payments and fines from fired, demoted or suspended employees (the salaries were calculated over two years). Many dismissed employees were not replaced.
Check the story for some examples of the type of corruption the OIG is finding.
As the Inky notes, some people have asked whether the office is really necessary, given that the city already has a Controller and a district attorney fighting corruption. The OIG's yearly allocation is $1.3 million, so we suppose the implication of this report is that the OIG is doing better than breaking even for the city. Of course, this isn't simply a matter of dollars -- you could argue that there's social benefit to having another watchdog sniffing out corruption; you could also argue that duplicated efforts are wasteful regardless of these financial details.
Follow us on Twitter and review city services on our sister site, City Howl.
- Philly Clout
- Metropolis
- Attytood
- Heard in the Hall
- Commonwealth Confidential
- Philebrity
- Phawker
- Young Philly Politics
- OurPhiladelphia
- Capitol Ideas
- Grassroots PA
- PA Policy Blog
- Media Mobilizing Project
- The Notebook
- Dave Davies Off Mic
- Committee of Seventy
- The Independent
- Naked City
- Plan Philly
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008

















