Editorial: Why should taxpayers be on the hook for lawmakers' legal fees?
News blogs, sports blogs, entertainment blogs, and more from Philly.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer and the Philadelphia Daily News.
Editorial: Why should taxpayers be on the hook for lawmakers' legal fees?
It's Our Money
As a member of the Pennsylvania House, Bill DeWeese's base salary was $82,000 — all taxpayer money. Earlier this year, DeWeese was convicted of theft of state resources, for staffing his election campaigns with state — being paid with taxpayer money. This week, WHYY's Dave Davies reported that $84,000 in attorney fees for DeWeese's defense was paid for with - you guessed it — taxpayer money. And there's no indication that it will be paid back.
Why have taxpayers been so generous to DeWeese? One of the many perks provided to state legislators is coverage of legal fees related to their work. The coverage stops once an indictment is made or a charge is filed, and state law technically says that if an elected official is convicted, he or she has to reimburse the public. But, except in one recent case — Allegheny County prosecutors recently filed a motion to get convicted state Sen. Jane Orie to repay the state $1.3 million in legal fees — neither prosecutors nor the Legislature has sought repayment of these costs.
The total amount of money that taxpayers have ponied up in legal fees for lawmakers is unknown, but they've chipped in on many of the cases in which 25 politicians and their aides have been convicted in just the past four years. That includes the $1.2 million in legal fees accrued by convicted Sen. Vince Fumo.
There is actually an argument for taxpayers providing some legal coverage to elected officials. It would be a problem if frivolous lawsuits or investigations could bankrupt a legislator — only the rich could afford to govern.
But, as with health insurance, we're not sure why legislators think that they're entitled to a Cadillac when most Pennsylvanians get a bicycle. DeWeese was represented by big-shot attorney William Costopolous. You know what the state offers you if you're accused of a crime? The limited resources of the Pennsylvania Legal Aid Network.
Nor should prosecutors and the Legislature look the other way on collecting repayment from officials convicted of crimes. These folks did not get into legal trouble while doing their jobs; taxpayers don't pay them to steal from taxpayers. They were, by definition, not doing their jobs. Make them pay us back.
This It's Our Money editorial also appeared in the Daily News.
That'll be the day they are made topay it back. granddad1
this 'media' outlet encourages everyone else to feed at the trough of the taxpayer so why would they get upset at Deweese doing it?? Can't have it anyway it fits for your agenda keapitreal
of course if convicted they should pay for thier own defense. also thier overly generous pension should be part of pension reform. these folks are bankrupting our commonwealth. jstash
A new paragraph in the in the oath of office could be added where Senators, Representatives and all judicial, State and county officers agree to an escrow contract on future pension pmts to reimburse the cost of legal fees back to the Commonwealth if indicted for crimes in office. Furthermore,there should be promissory agreements on forfeiture of personal property, garnishment of cash and investments & agreements to serve mandatory minimum jail sentences if convicted.
This should be written into the oath of office, recited at the opening of every legislative session, embroidered onto the state flag, carved in granite in the House & Senate chambers and recorded into and played on the Capitol's phone system before the 'this call may be recorded for quality & training purposes' and 'if you know your extension dial it now prompts! If nothing else this, amendment to the oath would update and more accurately reflect the opinion,level of trust and confidence the Commonwealth's electors now hold toward those we have elected.
Thanks/ Vote!! (if you can) gjg1330- He deserves an apology from O No and Nutter, because the apology tour as we know it has yet to finish.


