Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Council committee votes for radio system upgrade

Police radio system needs an updgrade Link: 5 on Council say 'Roger' to $34M Motorola cop-radio system [Daily News]

Council committee votes for radio system upgrade


Police radio system needs an updgrade

Public Property Commissioner Joan Schlotterbeck testified during a hearing that the city's maintenance contract with Motorola for the current $62 million, 800-megahertz digital system will expire next June.

She said that Motorola would agree to continue maintaining the old system only if the proposed upgrade - which could take up to two years to complete - is quickly approved by Council.

Darrell Clarke, the chairman of Council's Public Property and Public Works Committee, said that he and four other members yesterday "felt comfortable enough" with the plan to back it. Two other committee members, Frank Rizzo and Donna Reed Miller, did not attend the hearing.

A final vote by the rest of City Council is expected in about two weeks, Clarke said.

Schlotterbeck said the upgraded system, which would be leased by the city for four years, would include 50 digital repeaters to improve radio communications below grade and in high-rise buildings.

Firefighters, cops and city prisons will get 2,700 new radios in the upgrade, which would also reband the current system to avoid cell-phone interference, she said.

The upgrade, which will be paid with money from the state's 911 Fund, has the backing of Police and Fire Department officials, as well as their respective unions.

Councilman Bill Green, who attended the hearing but does not sit on the Public Works Committee, wondered why the city didn't put the upgrade out to bid.

Green said that he was told by committee members that putting out a Request for Proposal (RFP) would take too long, and rebuilding the system from scratch would be too expensive.

"Basically, Motorola is able to put a gun to our head because we didn't manage this process properly," he said.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Every year, city government spends slightly more than $4 billion. Where does all that money come from? More importantly, where does it go? Are we getting the most bang for our tax buck? “It's Our Money” is a joint project between Philadelphia Daily News and WHYY, funded by the William Penn Foundation, designed to answer these questions.

It's Our Money contributors

Tips? Comments? Questions?

Holly Otterbein:

It's Our Money
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter