Yesterday, Congressional candidate and State Representative Bryan Lentz called for House Majority Leader Todd Eachus to be removed from his leadership position. Lentz says he wants a new caucus election because of the ongoing corruption investigation by Attorney General Tom Corbett.
“My experiences as an officer in the 82nd Airborne Division tell me that there are times when an entire chain of command must be relieved in order to restore confidence in an organization,” Lentz said. “That time has come for the House Democratic caucus. A cloud of corruption has hung over our Commonwealth for too long and we must take clear affirmative steps to regain the confidence of the citizens of Pennsylvania."
Lentz's push to remove Eachus is a signal that corruption could be a major issue in the 2010 election.
Lentz, the Democratic front-runner in the 7th Congressional District, appears to be the first member of the caucus to call for Eachus’ ouster. As a state grand jury investigating corruption in the Capital continues to charge and implicate Democratic leaders, it remains to be seen if Eachus will succumb to the fate of former House Majority Leader Bill DeWeese.
If more rank-and-file lawmakers start calling for Eachus to step down, we could see another leadership election in the near future. We'll keep you up to date. In the meantime, check out our special Harrisburg Reform page.
Review city services on our sister site, City Howl.
It sounds fair to remove for cause if there is reason to believe the investigation will bear fruit, will be long and protracted, involves other elements of the leadership, or if there is some precedent for members stepping down while under investigation for serious allegations. But there are only allegations at this time about many members of both parties. Shall they all step down, or only the ones in leadership positions in the legislature? The similar charges are by an AG to both parties, so this is not easily dismissed as a witch hunt of one party by another. It is a housecleaning. What are the rules of conduct? Seems like that is another reform that should be specified. CleanupPhilly
fafafooey: who/what are you talking about? benwaxman
- Philly Clout
- Metropolis
- Attytood
- Heard in the Hall
- Commonwealth Confidential
- Philebrity
- Phawker
- Young Philly Politics
- OurPhiladelphia
- Capitol Ideas
- Grassroots PA
- PA Policy Blog
- Media Mobilizing Project
- The Notebook
- Dave Davies Off Mic
- Committee of Seventy
- The Independent
- Naked City
- Plan Philly
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008

















