Wallace's availability could affect DeSean
News blogs, sports blogs, entertainment blogs, and more from Philly.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer and the Philadelphia Daily News.
Wallace's availability could affect DeSean
Sheil Kapadia, Philly.com
I've written at length in the past few weeks about how the market will affect DeSean Jackson's future - either in Philadelphia, or elsewhere.
But one name that I haven't brought up until now is Mike Wallace.
The possibility of the Steelers parting ways with Wallace seems to be incerasing. Ed Bouchette of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette has an excellent breakdown of the situation. Basically, the Steelers are about $10M over the cap, and Wallace is a restricted free agent. They can serve up a one-year tender, and if another team makes Wallace an offer, the Steelers have the right to match it. But if they don't, he can sign elsewhere, and Pittsburgh would receive a first-round pick in return.
In the past, teams would have had to give up a first- and third-round pick to sign Wallace. But with the new CBA, it's just a first-rounder.
So, what does this have to do with Jackson? He and Wallace are two of the premier young deep threats in the game, and teams could have a chance to potentially make a run at each of them.
If the Eagles franchise Jackson, but make it known that he can be had for the right offer, suitors would have to meet two requirements:
1. The Eagles' asking price in a trade.
2. Jackson's asking price for a new contract.
Teams wanting Wallace (assuming the Steelers offer the one-year tender) would have to give up a first-round pick and offer up a new deal that Pittsburgh doesn't match.
Wallace and Jackson rank first and second, respectively, in catches of 25+ yards the last two seasons, according to ESPN's NFL Live. The two receivers averaged the exact same yards per catch last year (16.6). And among wide receivers with at least 40 catches in 2010, Jackson (22.5) and Wallace (21.0) finished first and second in yards per catch.
Here's a look at how their receiving numbers stack up the past two seasons:
| Games | Catches/g. | Yds./g. | Yds./catch | TDs | |
| Wallace | 32 | 4.1 | 76.6 | 18.6 | 18 |
| Jackson | 29 | 3.6 | 69.6 | 19.2 | 10 |
Wallace has the edge in every category except for yards per catch. However, it should be noted that Jackson's best statistical year - 2009 - was not included here (I used the last two seasons because Wallace didn't become a full-time starter until 2010). Jackson also had two touchdowns (one rushing, one returning) that are not included in the chart above.
Both are 25 years old; Jackson is four months younger. Jackson is listed at 5-10, 175 pounds; Wallace at 6-0, 199. Wallace hasn't missed a game in three NFL seasons. Jackson has missed two games in four seasons because of injury, and one more for disciplinary reasons. He's suffered two concussions.
The two areas where Jackson receives a large degree of criticism are drops and his red-zone performance. In the past two seasons, Jackson has dropped 13.2 percent of the catchable balls thrown his way (using data from Pro Football Focus, STATS.com and my own game charting). Wallace has dropped 8.6 percent of the catchable balls thrown his way.
And here are the red zone numbers since 2010:
| RZ catches | RZ TDs | |
| Wallace | 9 | 4 |
| Jackson | 6 | 2 |
Wallace has the edge here as well, although he's not a prolific red-zone target.
Here's the paragraph that stuck out from the Bouchette piece I referenced above:
Here's the question the Steelers and other prospective suitors in free agency must determine: Did defenses figure out Mike Wallace finally as the one-trick pony that Mike Tomlin long declared he was? Wallace is at his best running the "go" routes and outside flag patterns, where he has a chance to outrun someone. However, when faced with cover two defenses and safeties hanging deep, he's not as effective. He does not seem to fight for the ball at times and even gives up on some when covered.
Part of that evaluation could certainly be applied to Jackson.
Teams needing a vertical threat could have plenty of options this offseason - Wallace, Jackson and Vincent Jackson (also a potential unrestricted free agent) could all be available. And Baylor's Kendall Wright is receiving buzz as a potential first-round pick.
They are all players to keep an eye on as we see which teams make use of the franchise tag and which agree to long-term deals with their own players in the coming weeks.
You can follow me on Twitter or become a fan of Moving the Chains on Facebook.
if your QB is A) standing on the sideline because of broken ribs - it makes no different who the WR is - B) too busy running around like a chicken w/o a head - it makes no difference who your WR is - C) if your QB is too busy turning the ball over - it makes no difference who your WR is,, just saying! Oh and good luck Juan with all your "hard work" & 22.5 hour work days this coming season— With all this talent who needs a real defensive coordinator 2011- I am not sure I would give up the #15 pick for Mike Wallace, then have to pay him 10mil/year-but if it happens, see ya Desean Alligater arm, son of a Pinkston.— tommy_the_k
- I would rather have Mike Wallace. He is not one head injury away from retirement, little drama and a good complement to Maclin.— Clt Philly Fan
- LOVE WALLACE, BUT WOULD RATHER GET VINCENT JACKSON— DONDEN31
- agreed and VJ in last 3 years has only dropped 5% of passes his way, 5th in NFL, where DeSean is near bottom of NFL ranked 41st. — crohnkiller
- Unless there are no other options, why give up a pick? Look at the UFAs and use the picks to get some depth...or actual starting LBs and Safeties.— tpizza
- Yes Sir Agreed !!!!
Two linebackers out of first three picks.
I prefer Vontaze Burfict, even if only plays 50% of the snaps his rookie year.
His MEAN streak will rub off and I miss that the most about our defense.
— dmanphilly - What about ducks & drops?— jjthree
- And it doesn't matter what the front office or Andy Reid have to say about it, even if they say they are 100% behind one decision, they could easily be LYING ABOUT IT. Love the team, DESPISE the organization off the field. Lying, greedy sacks of garbage, all of them.— girouxforpresident
- VINCENT JACKSON !!!— techdiver
- Is this even a debate? Really? Mike Wallace makes the Steelers a better team. DeSean Jackson is a clown who isn't even that good. Steelers= six rings/Eagles= zero rings. Maybe we should stop pretending we're just a few lucky bounces away from winning the Super Bowl and go and get as many good/better players as possible. Maybe?— rubicon24
- Mike Wallace had little to do with the Steelers 5 rings prior to him being there so it's a moot point that Pitt has 6 to Philly's 0. and They are the same player. If they want a change, get VJax or Bowe, not another guy who just runs 9 routes and catches deep balls — bjm5028
- Keep your own guys. Have we learned nothing from dabbling in free agency? Have we learned nothing from watching Washington dabble in free agency? Maybe you get one or two key players and another two or three role players through free agency, but you win by building through the draft.— kingsolomonsmind
- Say what you want to about Mike Wallace....the Steelers aren't going to just let him get away. To be honest, he's most likely going to stay put. Don't read too much into what coach Tomlin supposedly said about Wallace. The Steelers are just " postering " to see what interest there is out there. Andy Reid is NOT going to give up a 1st round pick for a WR when he could get one from free agency. AND....Andy isn't going to get a WR in free agency or the draft because from past experience, Andy likes to get offensive and defensive lineman. All this talk about WRs in free agency or the draft is just talk. Andy is going to get a defensive tackle, defensive end or another guard ( in case they don't bring back Evan Mathis ) to challenge the " incumbants " at those positions in training camp. Andy values they guys in the " trenches " and the more guys he can have in training camp to promote " healthy " competition....the better. No matter who you guys say is a " clown ", or who drops more passes, whatever! FORGETABOUT IT! I fail to see why the author of this article here and everyone else jumps in and spends valuable time talking about something we all know WON'T HAPPEN!— tony b
- Sure, and Vincent Jackson isn't a head case???????— oakmontleo
Follow
Sheil on Twitter. And become
a fan of Moving the Chains on Facebook.
Download our NEW iPhone/Android app for even more Birds
coverage, including app-exclusive videos and analysis. Download it here.
