Thursday, October 23, 2014
Inquirer Daily News

Leadership Agenda: Teresa Bryce Bazemore on mortgage insurance

Insurance is a business that's all about hedging bets. Not surprisingly, Teresa Bryce Bazemore, president of Radian Guaranty Inc., one of the nation's largest insurers of mortgages, thinks her company's product is a good hedge -- not just for banks, but for the nation, as she explained in my Leadership Agenda interview.

Leadership Agenda: Teresa Bryce Bazemore on mortgage insurance

Insurance is a business that's all about hedging bets. Not surprisingly, Teresa Bryce Bazemore, president of Radian Guaranty Inc., one of the nation's largest insurers of mortgages, thinks her company's product is a good hedge -- not just for banks, but for the nation, as she explained in my Leadership Agenda interview.

I'll let her explain, but first a definition. Lenders often require home buyers to purchase mortgage insurance when they are putting down less than 20 percent of the house's value. When less than 78 percent of the value of the house remains on the mortgage, buyers can stop paying the insurance after contacting their lender. That's assuming the purchase price represents the value of the house. If the value of the house goes up, the payments can be stopped sooner because the remaining balance on the loan is less than 78 percent of the value of the house. By the way, the insurance protects the lender in the event of a default -- not the buyer.

OK, back to Bazemore:

"You may have some lenders who think it’s a good idea to self-insure," she told me. "The problem is, as an insurance company, we have significant requirements around having reserves.  We have to put aside 50 percent of every premium dollar into a contingency reserve fund for 10 years.  I call it the rainy day fund. You are essentially putting aside capital, so if there’s a downturn, you have money socked away.

"Other industries don’t have that level of capital reserving," she said.

Banks may, she said, decide to issue a mortgage with a 10 percent down payment and just handle the risk. "You could charge more and you would keep the money [in other words – a higher interest rate]," she said.

"Unlike that scenario, we’re actually socking away money to have so that if something happens to that loan later, we are actually reserved for those types of risks. We think it should be a requirement. That would actually be a good thing for the system itself – for the housing finance system and for the taxpayer after all of what the taxpayers had to shoulder over the last few years.

"I mean our [mortgage insurance] industry didn’t get a bailout [during the financial crisis] and frankly, some of these structural issues in terms of our reserving requirements are the reason we are still here." Click here to be linked to Radian's most recent financial report. It's still losing money, but less of it.

Jane M. Von Bergen Inquirer Staff Writer
About this blog

Jobbing covers the workplace – employment, unemployment, management, unions, legal issues, labor economics, benefits, work-life balance, workforce development, trends and profiles.

Jane M. Von Bergen writes about workplace issues for the Inquirer.

Married to a photographer she met at her college newspaper, Von Bergen has been a reporter since fourth grade, covering education, government, retailing, courts, marketing and business. “I love the specific detail that tells the story,” she says.

Reach Jane M. at jvonbergen@phillynews.com.

Jane M. Von Bergen Inquirer Staff Writer
Topics: