Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Goats and unions

Once upon a time, there were two neighbors, one with a goat....

Goats and unions


Once upon a time, there were two neighbors, one with a goat.... 

Like many teachers, Philip Harvey, a professor of law and economics at Rutgers University, likes to use parables to illustrate a point -- and here's the preview -- the goat stands in for a good union job with what used to be standard benefits -- health insurance, pension, vacation time.  

Anyway, once upon a time, there were two neighbors, one with a goat, Harvey said. To reconcile the inequity, the goatless neighbor killed his neighbor's goat.

Now neither neighbor has a goat  -- or goat milk, or goat cheese. Instead of trying to figure out how to raise more goats, the goatless neighbor would rather see his neighbor with no goat. 

“I think it has to do with whether you can ever imagining yourself having a good union job in your grasp,” Harvey said.

“Since union jobs have  been declining for several decades, the chances of getting what  union workers get are receding,” he said. "The public doesn't even conceive that it is possible." That leads to resentment and yes, goaticide.

Because union density is so low, most can't imagine belonging to a union, except perhaps in the public sector, where unions are more prevalent, he said. (You can read my story about unions in Sunday's Inquirer.)

"Quite frankly, I am deathly afraid that we may be seeing the beginnings of the decline in public sector unionization that we have been seeing in the private sector," he said. "It was always reassuring to think that, yeah, the private sector union movement is in the toilet, but the public sector is 40 percent – and that was rock solid."

Because so few private sector workers are unionized, or for that matter, have family members who are union, they are less inclined to support workers in the public sector with union jobs (the goat).

"The public really isn’t strongly supportive of public sector unionized workers and so they (Republican legislators) can chip away at public sector union rights," Harvey said. "The practical effect will be to reduce the strength of public sector unions and then eventually the density as fewer  people see a need for unions."

Inquirer Staff Writer
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Jobbing covers the workplace – employment, unemployment, management, unions, legal issues, labor economics, benefits, work-life balance, workforce development, trends and profiles.

Jane M. Von Bergen writes about workplace issues for the Inquirer.

Married to a photographer she met at her college newspaper, Von Bergen has been a reporter since fourth grade, covering education, government, retailing, courts, marketing and business. “I love the specific detail that tells the story,” she says.

Reach Jane M. at jvonbergen@phillynews.com.

Jane M. Von Bergen Inquirer Staff Writer
Also on Philly.com:
letter icon Newsletter