Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Employees or students

Are graduate assistants who teach college classes employees or students? How about residents who are completing their medical training at hospitals?

Employees or students


Are graduate assistants who teach college classes employees or students? How about residents who are completing their medical training at hospitals? 

It's a key issue, because employees are allowed to form unions, but students aren't. Last week, votes from a long delayed union election by residents at St. Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx were counted. The result: 119 in favor of the union, two opposed. 

Last week, my colleague, Chris Hepp, wrote a story in the Philadelphia Inquirer about Temple's adjunct instructors trying to form a union. There have been long battles over that same topic at Yale, New York University and the University of Pennsylvania. The argument turns on whether the adjuncts are students, working as instructors in a work-study kind of way, or whether they are closer to employees.

For hospital residents, the issue tends to be a little clearer. The kind of salaries they earn, (considerably more than $45,000) and the hospitals' contributions to benefits and pensions help push the argument that residents are more like employees than students.

In January, 2009, nearly 90 percent of the residents of St. Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx, New York, petitioned the hospital seeking to have the Committee of Residents and Interns/Service Employees International Union Healthcare recognized as their bargaining unit. The hospital refused and the matter went to a National Labor Relations Board  election in May 2009, after a local board ruling that the residents were entitled to form a union. 

The hospital appealed and the election results were impounded before they were counted. On June 3, 2010, the National Labor Relations Board upheld the lower board's ruling, saying the residents were clearly employees.

So what is the upshot? Maybe it will mean that there will be some limitation on the hours that residents can work. Can good medical care really be delivered by someone who is on an 70 or 80 hour work week?        

Inquirer Staff Writer
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Jobbing covers the workplace – employment, unemployment, management, unions, legal issues, labor economics, benefits, work-life balance, workforce development, trends and profiles.

Jane M. Von Bergen writes about workplace issues for the Inquirer.

Married to a photographer she met at her college newspaper, Von Bergen has been a reporter since fourth grade, covering education, government, retailing, courts, marketing and business. “I love the specific detail that tells the story,” she says.

Reach Jane M. at jvonbergen@phillynews.com.

Jane M. Von Bergen Inquirer Staff Writer
Also on Philly.com:
letter icon Newsletter