Monday, July 6, 2015

Red Line Tragedy

The computer wizardry featured in the new movie The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 failed when two commuter trains collided on Washington's popular Red Line.

Red Line Tragedy


It is ironic that a popular movie this week is a remake of the 1974 film  "The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, a Denzel Washington vehicle that also features all the modern technology devised to prevent subway-train crashes.

Hijackers thwart the safety gizmos in the fictional depiction, but investigators today were still trying to figure out what went terribly wrong and allowed two commuter trains to collide in Washington on Monday, killing nine people and leaving almost 80 injured.

Washington’s popular Metro system is equipped with a fail-safe signal system that should have prevented the rush-hour accident. There is a precedent, however; the Washington Post reports that only the quick thinking of two operators who noticed their trains were too close prevented a similar crash four years ago.

Eyewitness accounts suggest the operator of the second train in Monday’s crash either did not apply the brakes, or did not do that fast enough, to keep it from ramming the first train, which had stopped. But there were also reports that the older train was overdue for brake maintenance.

It will likely take the National Transportation Safety Board some time to make a final ruling. It took two years before it attributed a 2006 head-on collision of two SEPTA trains to human error; finally concluding that one engineer ignored warning signals and a dispatcher didn’t intervene. Thirty-eight people were injured.

The carnage after Monday’s wreck on the Red Line was “unbelievable,” to quote Metro General Manager John B. Crane Jr. The first car of the second train went airborne and landed on top of the first train. Inside the crushed cars, passengers suffered cuts, broken bones, and other injuries.

Good wishes are extended to the injured victims, and condolences to the families of those who died. The Red Line wreck was a reminder that even with one of the safest, technologically advanced modes of transportation, the unexpected can occur.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on
letter icon Newsletter