Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Student fees

Many school districts are finding themselves caught between a rock and a hard place: cut programs or charge student-activities fees.

Student fees


Many school districts are finding themselves caught between a rock and a hard place: cut programs or charge student-activities fees.

Strapped for cash, a growing number are asking families to pay fees for their children to participate in after-school programs, including sports and bands.

That option should be a last resort to avoid creating a “pay-to-play” system that could leave poor and working-class kids on the sidelines if their parents can’t afford the extra cost.

Across the region, parents are subsidizing extras that students have come to expect, such as French Club and band. Such programs sometimes get the ax in tough economic times, and students lose out — unless parents can chip in.

The fees can add up to hundreds of dollars over the course of a school year, depending on the district and how many children in a family are enrolled.

Some parents are already burdened with high and ever-increasing property taxes to help pay for schools. The additional fees are an added burden.

Most districts, like Haddonfield, waive the fees for needy students. But some students will not participate rather than ask for the waiver.

Extracurricular activities help keep kids engaged in school and give them a well-rounded education. They also help develop social skills and boost self-esteem.

They also give them something to do when school lets out, instead of spending hours in front of a TV or roaming the streets and getting into trouble.

Experts believe those who participate in after-school programs are more likely to stay in school and graduate on time.
It is estimated that 15 million children are left home alone at the end of the regular school day. Many have no place to go because demand for after-school programs exceeds available slots.

To make do with less funding, other districts have scaled back the season with fewer games in some sports, or replaced middle-school athletics with intramural sports. Others have drummed up more community support or secured corporate sponsors. Some do fund-raisers to help supplement the costs.

Before more districts jump on the bandwagon to cut costs by charging extracurricular fees, they should explore other options to make after-school meaningful for all children, and not just those who can afford to pay.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter